:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專科護理師訓練課程成效評估之探討
書刊名:護理暨健康照護研究
作者:鍾瑞瑛高毓秀 引用關係
作者(外文):Chung, Rei-yiungKao, Yu-hsiu
出版日期:2012
卷期:8:3
頁次:頁201-211
主題關鍵詞:專科護理師Kirkpatrick四層次評估模式課程訓練成效Nurse practitionersKirkpatrick's four levels of evaluationEvaluation of training program effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:57
背景:2007年5月,首批經甄審通過領有專科護理師證照的護理人員產生;自此,台灣專科護理師正式走向制度化。但有關其課程訓練,是否真能提升專科護理師的專業能力?值得深思。目的:本研究以Kirkpatrick四層次評估模式作為研究之理論架構,以了解專科護理師之訓練課程成效,並分析不同個人背景因素之專科護理師在訓練課程成效的差異情形,同時探討課程滿意度、個人專業能力增進及實際工作應用成效等彼此間之關係。方法:本研究為問卷調查法,以全程參與衛生署公告合格醫院舉辦之專科護理師標準訓練課程且實際參與執行專科護理師或資深護理師之臨床照護者為研究對象,共發放250份,有效問卷196份,回收率78%。結果:結果顯示(1)受訓學員對訓練課程成效皆有正面的評價,在課程滿意度中,最高為「訓練課程能夠提供新的觀念與知識」,最低則為「訓練課程時間的安排」;在個人專業能力增進中,最高為「事務處理與執行能力」,最低則為「倫理決策能力」;在實際工作應用成效中,最高為「能依據病患健康問題執行身體檢查以完整的評估病患」,最低為「能執行連續性照護(居家轉介、醫療輔助租借、醫師複診)」。(2)受訓學員對訓練課程成效,不會因性別、年齡、平均月收入、婚姻狀況、教育程度、專業背景、工作年資、訓練機構及訓練期別年度之不同而有所差異。(3)整體而言,課程滿意度、個人能力增進與實際工作應用彼此間呈現顯著正相關。結論:研究結果,可做為未來專科護理師訓練課程規劃之參考,以增進照護管理的品質。
Background: Nurse practitioners (NPs) were first qualified in Taiwan in May 2007. The effectiveness of NP-related courses and training in enhancing nurse practitioner proficiency requires further investigation.Purpose: This study used Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation as its research framework and analyzed the influence of various NP demographic variables on NP training program effectiveness. This study also explored relationships among course satisfaction, individual proficiency improvements, and practical applications.Method: This study used a questionnaire to investigate subjects. Those recruited included nurse practitioners and senior nurses who had completed a nurse practitioners training program held by Department of Health-approved hospitals and had clinical care experience. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed and 196 valid questionnaires were retrieved, giving a response rate of 78%.Results: All subjects held positive attitudes toward the effectiveness of their NP training program. In terms of course satisfaction, the questionnaire item "training courses can provide the latest concepts and knowledge" and "arrangement of training course schedules" earned the highest and lowest scores, respectively. In terms of personal proficiency improvement, "handling and implementation abilities" and "ethical decision-making abilities" earned the highest and lowest scores, respectively. In terms of practical application, "enable the implementation of physical examinations to fully evaluate patient health" and "enable the implementation of continuing care (including home care referrals, medical device leases, and physician-initiated visits)" earned the highest and lowest scores, respectively. Results further found that gender, age, average monthly income, marital status, education level, professional background, seniority, training institutions, and number of training years, respectively, had no significant impact on training effectiveness. Overall, results showed course satisfaction, individual proficiency improvements, and practical applications to be positively correlated.Conclusion: Research results can serve as a reference for planning nurse practitioners training programs in the future.
期刊論文
1.陳雪娥、吳俊裕(20060400)。由我國『專科護理師』制度之推行展望護理人員職涯發展。澄清醫護管理雜誌,2(2),24-33。  延伸查詢new window
2.王曼溪、林文綾(20071200)。專科護理師的養成與發展。護理雜誌,54(6),11-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳雅雯(20050900)。美國護理執業師的角色。慈濟護理雜誌,4(3),8-13。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳燕芬、陳桂櫻、張靖梅(20090600)。專科護理師證照制度看法之初探。童綜合醫學雜誌,3(1),27-36。  延伸查詢new window
5.計惠卿、吳斯茜、許倩舲(20070900)。數位學習之訓練績效評鑑。研習論壇,81,38-47。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王薰蓉(2006)。財稅人員在職訓練成效評估之研究(碩士論文)。玄奘大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Blanchard, P. N.、Thacker, J. W.(1999)。Effective Training: Systems, Strategies and Practices。Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice Hall。  new window
2.曾淑惠(20040000)。教育評鑑模式。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kirkpatrick, Donald L.、Kirkpatrick, James D.(2006)。Evaluating training programs: The four levels。Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.丁志達(2009)。培訓管理。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱延智(2008)。人力資源管理。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院衛生署(2007)。預告專科護理師分科與甄審辦法。  延伸查詢new window
4.周淑怡(2007)。醫療機構內員工教育訓練之成效評估--以中部某醫學中心為例。  延伸查詢new window
5.張仁家(2009)。企業訓練與發展。  延伸查詢new window
6.張瑀玲、林欣欣(2008)。從美國急症執業護理師看台灣專科護理師之發展。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳勁甫、林竹楠(2005)。生態解說員參與解說訓練成效評估之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡淑鳳、王秀紅(2007)。台灣專科護理師的政策制定和發展。  延伸查詢new window
9.潘秉恕(2005)。訓練成效研究以台電公司環境管理系統訓練為例。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bates, R.(2004)。A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence。  new window
11.Gully, S. M. ; Chen, G.(2010)。Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcomes。  new window
12.Mathieu, J. E. ; Tesluk, P. E.(2010)。A multilevel perspective on training and development effectiveness。  new window
13.Noe, R. A.(2006)。Employee training and development。  new window
14.Wang, G. G. ; Wilcox, D.(2006)。Training evaluation: Knowing more than is practiced。  new window
15.Werner, J. M. ; Desimone, R. L.(2006)。Human resource development。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE