臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：工作愉悅度與工作挫折感中文版量表之信效度驗證
書刊名：護理暨健康照護研究
作者：張遠萍 引用關係／蔡來蔭／廖瑞原／王凰伊／王秀紅 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Yuan-ping／Tsai, Lai-yin／Liao, Ruei-yuan／Wang, Huang-i／Wang, Hsiu-hung
出版日期：2012
卷期：8:3
頁次：頁232-241
主題關鍵詞：工作愉悅度；工作挫折感；Work excitement；Work frustration
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:100
背景：目前用以測量員工工作感受之量表，以工作滿意最受到普遍應用。然而能運用於護理職場同時兼具測量正負向工作感受之中文版量表仍有待建置，故本研究以Erbin-Roesemann及Simms所發展「工作愉悅」與「工作挫折」的中文版量表加以驗證，期望廣泛運用於台灣護理與管理研究中。目的：旨在於驗證中文版工作愉悅與工作挫折量表，以能運用於護理人員對工作正負向感受之測量。方法：以授權使用之英文版工作愉悅與工作挫折量表，經中文化後，以南台灣某醫院護理人員為研究對象，有效樣本資料為887筆，除進行內在一致信度外，另以因素分析作為建構效度檢定。結果：中文版工作愉悅度量表，經因素分析後取得三個因素構面分別為「專業運用與發揮」、「知識學習與成長」、以及「工作挑戰與變化」，累積解釋變異量為72.12%，Cronbach's α值為.93。中文版工作挫折感量表，經因素分析後亦產生三個因素構面分別為「人際互動」、「資源運用」、以及「工作安排」，累積解釋變異量為65.27%，Cronbach's α值為.93。結論：中文版工作愉悅度與挫折感量表均具良好之信、效度驗證結果。可運用於護理人員對臨床工作正負向感受之測量，此有助於醫療機構日後重新設計護理臨床實務照護模式之參考。
Background: Several different questionnaires have been used to assess employee work attitudes and performance, with job satisfaction the most commonly used indicator. Chinese-version questionnaires able to assess work attitudes and performance in nursing still await development. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of Chinese versions of, respectively, work excitement (WE) and work frustration (WF) questionnaires originally developed by Erbin-Roesemann and Simms. The authors hope the Chinese-version WE and WF may be broadly applied in Taiwan as valid nursing and management research tools.Purpose: This study examined the reliability and validity of work excitement and work frustration in measuring factors that positively / negatively influence the work attitudes of nursing professionals in Taiwan.Methods: Chinese-version WE and WF questionnaires were back translated into English to assess validity. The authors recruited 887 nursing professionals from a hospital in southern Taiwan as participants. Factor analysis assessed internal reliability and construct validity.Results: In the Chinese version of the WE questionnaire, factor analysis identified the 3 factors of (1) usage and development of professional skills, (2) acquisition and development of knowledge, and (3) challenge and variation of the job. These three explained 72.12% of total variance; the Cronbach's α value was .93. Factor analysis of the Chinese version of the WF questionnaire identified the 3 factors of (1) interpersonal relationships, (2) resource application, and (3) work management. These three explained 65.27% of total variance; the Cronbach's α was .93.Conclusion: Examination of Chinese-version WE and WF questionnaires demonstrated high reliability and validity. These two questionnaires are valid for use in measuring positive and negative influences in clinical practice and appear applicable to all nursing staff levels. This result may be referenced in the future design of clinical nursing care models.
期刊論文
1.Larsen, J. T.、McGraw, A. P.(2011)。Further evidence for mixed emotions。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，100(6)，1095-1110。  new window
2.Sadovich, J. M.(2005)。Work excitement in nursing: An examination of the relationship between work excitement and burnout。Nursing Economic，23(2)，91-96。  new window
3.Simms, L. M.、Erbin-Roesemann, M.、Darga, A.、Coeling, H.(1990)。Breaking the burnout barrier: Resurrecting work excitement in nursing。Nursing Economic，8(3)，177-187。  new window
4.Fox, S.、Spector, P. E.(1999)。A model of work frustration-aggression。Journal of Organizational Behavior，20(6)，915-931。  new window
5.林佑樺(20031200)。新進護理人員感受臨床護理工作挫折之探討。慈濟護理雜誌，2(4)，83-94。  延伸查詢new window
6.Edwards, J. R.、Rothbard, N. P.(1999)。Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，77(2)，85-129。  new window
7.Fong, C. T.(2006)。The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity。Academy of Management Journal，49(5)，1016-1030。  new window
8.Brayfield, Arthur H.、Rothe, Harold F.(1951)。An index of job satisfaction。Journal of Applied Psychology，35(5)，307-311。  new window
9.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika，39(1)，31-36。  new window
10.Bakker, A. B.、Demerouti, E.、Verbeke, W.(2004)。Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance。Human Resource Management，43(1)，83-104。  new window
11.Harvey, P.、Harris, K. J.(2010)。Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication。Human Relations，63(11)，1639-1660。  new window
12.Aiken, Linda H.、Clarke, Sean P.、Sloane, Douglas M.、Sochalski, Julie、Silber, Jeffrey H.(2002)。Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction。Journal of the American Medical Association，288(16)，1987-1993。  new window
13.Luthans, Fred(2002)。The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior。Journal of Organizational Behavior，23(6)，695-706。  new window
圖書
1.Gorsuch, R. L.(1983)。Factor analvsis。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Fields, D. L.(2002)。Taking the measure of work: A guide to validated scales for organizational research and diagnosis。Thousand, Oaks：SAGE。  new window
3.Field, A.(2005)。Discovering statistics using SPSS。London：SAGE Publications。  new window
4.Weiss, D. J.、Dawis, R. V.、England, G. W.、Lofquist, L. H.(1967)。Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire。Minneapolis：Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota。  new window
其他
1.何金銘(2006)。統計分析方法：SPSS軟體的輔助分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beckman, J. S. ; Simms, L. M.(1992)。A guide to redesigning nursing practice patterns。  new window
3.Chang, Y. P.(1997)。Work excitement and frustration of internal medicine nurses in Taiwan。  new window
4.de Vaus, D.(2002)。Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis。  new window
5.Ditomassi, M.(2012)。A multi-instrument evaluation of the professional practice environment。  new window
6.Erbin-Roesemann, M. ; Simms, L.(1995)。The Work Excitement Tool (WEXCIT)。  new window
7.Erbin-Roesemann, M. A. ; Simms, L. M.(1997)。Work locus of control: The intrinsic factor behind empowerment and work excitement。  new window
8.Hayes, L. J. ; O’Brien-Pallas, L. ; Duffield, C. ; Shamian, J. ; Buchan, J. ; Hughes, F. ; Stone, P. W.(2006)。Nurse turnover: A literature review。  new window
9.Hentemann, A. M. ; Simms, L. M. ; Erbin-Roesemann, M. L. ; Greene, C. L.(1992)。Work excitement: An energy source for critical care nurses。  new window
10.Hughes, R. G. (Ed.)(2008)。Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses。  new window
11.Krebs, E. E. ; Garrett, J. M. ; Konrad, T. R.(2006)。The difficult doctor? Characteristics of physicians who report frustration with patients: An analysis of survey data。  new window
12.Lickman, P. ; Simms, L. ; Greene, C.(1993)。Learning environment: The catalyst for work excitement。  new window
13.Maslach, C. ; Schaufeli, W. B. ; Leiter, M. P.(2001)。Job burn-out。  new window
14.McHugh, M. D. ; Kutney-Lee, A. ; Cimiotti, J. P. ; Sloane, D. M. ; Aiken, L. H.(2011)。Nurses’ widespread job dissatisfaction, burnout, and frustration with health benefits signal problems for patient care。  new window
15.Savage, S. ; Simms, L. M. ; Williams, R. A. ; Erbin-Roesemann, M.(1993)。Discovering work excitement among navy nurses。  new window
16.Zavodsky, A. ; Simms, L. M.(1996)。Work excitement among nurse executives and managers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：980（臺灣：972，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67837624
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上