This research aims to study the poetics and creative practice of the leader of the Latter Seven Masters-Li Panlong. The discussion starts from the literary elements of "classics", "form", and "style", and from the analysis we see Li's dedication to the study of classical Chinese literature, revealing his creative works and preferences which mimic works in ancient forms. Extending from the achievement of Li Mengyang, Li Panlong's style prevailed and he led the Latter Seven Masters in the forming of a new literary school. This analysis examines Li Panlong's poetic theories and the critics on his most representative work-the Ni Gu Yue Fu (imitation of the old-style Yue Fu) from the two key aspects-"apery" and "variations". From the analysis, we see that even though this series of Li Panlong's work adheres strictly to the styles and forms of the classical Chinese poems, creativity is not completely absent from the context. There are indeed many good works that reflect the reality of his times, and should not be negated by the accusation of plagiarism. Finally, the harsh criticisms of Li Panlong's poetic theories and creative works are investigated for the purpose of examining their legitimacy. "Imitation" is not without merit; the attempt to explore the values of the classics is a value in itself. With this principle in place, we reorganized Li Panlong's Ni Gu Yue Fu, with an attempt to reestablish the meaning and value of his effort to impart creativity in apery.