臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：九五高中地理暫綱的課程決定與理念探討
書刊名：環境與世界
作者：楊傑文／歐陽鍾玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Chieh-wen／Ouyang, Chung-ling
出版日期：2012
卷期：24/25
頁次：頁1-25
主題關鍵詞：九五地理暫綱；課程決定；地理課程；地理教育；課程理念；95 Geography curriculum guidelines；Curriculum decision making；Geography curriculum；Geography education；Curriculum rationales
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:214
課程改革後，課程決定議題在課程界已有相當多的討論，然而多著重於教室現場與學校層次，較少及於國家層次的討論。本研究視九五地理暫綱的制訂為國家層次課程決定與課程發展之過程，使用文件分析與半結構訪談法，探討其決定內容、決定因素及制綱者所秉持的課程制訂理念。在課程決定部分，地理科內部區分專案小組與研修小組，專案小組決定整體架構與討論修正，研修小組決定細節草案。最後決定權則在於專案小組，並且小組之間仍存有溝通問題，反映權威、知識與決定實鑲嵌於課程制訂過程中。無論專案小組還是研修小組，影響其決定因素皆相當多元，包括：學習者情況、學科專業、時數限制等。然而專案小組較為著重學科整體面向，而研修小組則較專注於學科教學面向。此外，綱要內容雖未受政治干預，然而整體制綱環境仍處於行政與政治的結構中，並使制綱者受到限制。在制綱者的理念方面，雖小組討論已達成共識，並制成綱要，然彼此理念並非相當一致，因其背景、個人因素有別。其理念亦反映我國地理教育受當代教育思潮影響。建議教育部應當更重視課程綱要之修訂，給予充分時間，成立或善用學科常設機構從事相關研究。
There are many discussions of curriculum decision-making in curriculum study after the curriculum reforming, but the focus is much on classroom and school level, less on national level. The study seems the making of 95 geography guidelines as a process of national level curriculum decision-making and curriculum development, using document analysis and semi-structural interviews methods to focus on content deciding, the factors influencing the decision and the makers' rationales about geography curriculum making.In decision-making part, this study finds that the decision-making team was divided into two parts: one was project team, the other was consultation team. The much powerful former team decided the whole structure and discussed the draft, the latter made the draft. And there were some imperfections between their communications, reflecting authority, knowledge and decision related each other. No matter project team or consultation team, the factors that influenced decision making were complex, including learner's situation, geography focus, hours limited. The project team was more focus on whole structure, and the consultation was more focus on teaching side. Moreover, politic power was not to interfere in curriculum contents directly, but hide in the process. In makers' rationale part, although the guidelines were made, then due to the different background of the makers, cause the inner rationales were different. And in the makers' rationales, we can find the influence of national geography education trend.Researcher suggests Ministry of Education should give more time to make the guideline, even to establish or use professional organization to reach an agreement about geography education between academia and school.
期刊論文
1.黃朝恩(19920600)。地理素養的養成。地理教育，18，11-20。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳家瑩、郭守芬(19990500)。「國民教育階段九年一貫課程綱要」--訂定之源起與過程。臺灣教育，581，48-57。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡良平(20040400)。教師即課程決定者--課程實踐的議題。課程與教學，7(2)，95-114+186。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉連祺、林淑萍(20030100)。布魯姆認知領域教育目標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究月刊，105，94-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.石再添、李薰楓(1991)。四十多年來我國的中學地理教育。教育資料集刊，16，169-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.歐陽鍾玲(1984)。學習地理的能力探討。中等教育，35(2)，47-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.歐陽鍾玲(1988)。淺談地理課程設計。中等教育，39(2)，75-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Boardman, D.(1995)。Designing new courses。Teaching geography，20(2)1，56。  new window
9.Criddle, E.(2004)。Discovering democracy: an analysis of curriculum policy for citizenship education。Westminster studies in education，27(1)，27-41。  new window
10.Fataar, A.(2006)。Policy networks in recalibrated political terrain: the case of school curriculum policy and politics in South Africa。Journal of education policy，21(6)，641-659。  new window
11.Gardner, D. P.(1986)。Geography in the school curriculum。Annals of the Association of American Geographers，76(1)，1-4。  new window
12.Ifanti, A. A.(2007)。Policy and curriculum development in Greece. The case of secondary school curriculum。Pedagogy, culture & society，15(1)，71-81。  new window
13.Silverbank, F.(1979)。Analyzing the decision-making process in curriculum projects。Education，99(4)，414-418。  new window
14.Winter. C.(2006)。Doing justice to geography in the secondary school: deconstruction, invention and the national curriculum。British journal of educational studies，54(2)，212-229。  new window
15.Winter, C.(2007)。Just maps: the geography curriculum in English schools。Oxford review of education，33(3)，349-366。  new window
學位論文
1.廖翊君(2007)。教育政策發展之論述分析--以九五高中新課程為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張輝山(2003)。九年一貫課程政策網絡分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪詠善(2000)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要決策過程之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.林青萸(2004)。課程與權力運作：以高中歷史科課程綱要修訂爲例。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2004)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brady, L. H.(1995)。Curriculum development。Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Apple, M. W.、Christian-Smith, L. K.(1991)。The politics of the textbook。Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.。  new window
5.江雪齡(1997)。多元文化教育。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.林玉體(1997)。西洋教育史。臺北：文景。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳國川(1995)。地理教材設計的理論與實踐。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.王文科(1999)。課程與教學論。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.施添福(1986)。地理教學--一個整合的模式。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學地理學系。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳奎熹(1990)。教育社會學研究。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳清基(1984)。教育行政決定理論與實際問題。台北市：文景。  延伸查詢new window
12.林寶山(1998)。教學原理與技巧。台北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
13.李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。台北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
14.張春興(2004)。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。東華。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北：東華。  延伸查詢new window
16.Ashley, K.(2003)。Geography and information and communication technologies: some future thinking。International handbook on geographical education \\ Gerber, R. (ed.)。Dordrecht ; Boston。  new window
17.Ashley, K.(2006)。Changing learning and teaching。Geograohical education in a changing world: past experience, current trends and future challenges \\ Lidstone, J. ; Williams, M. (ed.)。Dordrecht。  new window
18.Beddis, R.(1983)。Geographical education since 1960: a personal view。Geographical education: reflection and action \\ Huckle, J. (ed.)。Oxford。  new window
19.Bloom(1994)。Experts from the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain。Bloom's taxonomy: a forty-year retrospective \\ Anderson, L. W. (ed.)。Chicago, III。  new window
20.Wilson, G. K.、王鐵生(1993)。利益圑體。台北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Haubrich, H.(2006)。Changing Philosophies in deographical education from the 1970s to 2005 an international perspective。Geographical education in a changing world: past experience, current trends and future challenges \\ Lidstone, J. ; Williams, M. (eds.)。Dordrecht。  new window
22.Lam, C -C.、Lin, P.、Lee, J. C -K.、Yee, S. O.、Yang, G.(2006)。Geographical education in East Asia。Geograohical education in a changing world: past experience, current trends and future challenges \\ Lidstone, J. ; Williams, M. (eds.)。Dordrecht。  new window
23.Tilbury, D.(2002)。Active citizenship: empowering people as cultural agents through geography。Geography, culture and education \\ Gerber, R. (ed.)。Dordrecht ; Boston。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：595（臺灣：591，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67748762
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上