:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育教師課程決定重要議題與解決策略之探討
書刊名:臺大體育學報
作者:黃志成陳昭宇王傑賢 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chih-chengChen, Chao-yuWang, Jye-shyan
出版日期:2012
卷期:23
頁次:頁37-44
主題關鍵詞:課程意識意識形態體育課程發展實務知識價值取向Curriculum consciousnessIdeologyPE curriculum developmentPractical knowledgeValue orientation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:212
  • 點閱點閱:55
體育教師課程決定歷程中,最主要的關鍵在於學習活動選擇的規準,決策關乎身體活動所強調的內容,同時也需重視活動的連貫性。實際上,不同決定的背後經常隱藏著各種勢力的角逐與意識形態的衝突,此時必須藉由行動者的經驗知識與實踐智慧,以討論、對話、思辨、與分析作為整合思考與行動的條件,並協助課程決定的推展。本文從以下三個面向:傳統哲學觀與文化對體育教師價值取向的影響、社群缺少對話延緩體育課程的發展、全球化對在地化體育課程的影響等進行分析與討論,釐清現階段體育教師課程決定的相關問題,並進一步以「教師是課程設計者」的隱喻,強調課程是在教室活動中浮現的,是透過教師與學生互動中建構的,外來的教材、教學策略等等都只是教師和學生用以建構教室經驗的工具,課程是學校與教室中老師與學生生活的結合。換言之,體育教師應先建立體育教師課程決定的主體性,釐清體育教師在課程決定中的角色與定位,進而喚醒體育教師的課程意識,讓學校體育課程回歸到以教師為主體性,呼應學生需求的樣貌,展現體育課程的彈性與創新。
During the process of PE curriculum decisions, the crucial factors are the criterion of selecting learning activities, the contents decided by policies, and the continuity of the physical activities. In fact, behind those different decisions often include all kinds of power and inflicts among ideologies. Therefore, we should have discussion, dialogue, dialectic, and analysis to integrate our thinking and action in order to develop the process of curriculum decision making. In this paper, we discuss and analyze three issues, which are PE teachers' value orientation affected by traditional philosophy and inherent culture, PE curriculum development are suspended by lack of dialogue between groups, local PE curriculum affected by globalization. Furthermore, "teachers are curriculum designers" are the metaphor, which emphasize that PE curriculum are constructed by teachers and students during classes. Outer curriculum, material, instructional strategies are the tools for teachers and students to build the learning experiences. To take one step ahead, PE curriculum are combines with the lives of the teachers and students in the classroom. In other words, PE teachers should establish the subjectivity of curriculum decision making, figure out the role and the position in curriculum decision making, and then waken the curriculum consciousness of PE teachers. In short, PE curriculum should bake to the PE teachers' subjectivity and respond to the students' needs to unfold the innovation and the flexibilities of PE curriculum.
期刊論文
1.Ennis, C. D.(1992)。Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized value orientation。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,11,358-375。  new window
2.Kliebard, H. M.(1989)。Problems of definition in curriculum。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,5(1),1-5。  new window
3.武文瑛(2004)。全球化與在地化槪念辯證、分析與省思。教育學苑,7,43-58。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳昭宇(2008)。國中體育教師的反思、轉型與成長。學校體育雙月刊,18(6),64-70。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ayers, William C.、Schubert, William H.(1989)。The normative and the possible: Values in the curriculum。Educational Forum,53(4),355-364。  new window
學位論文
1.張春秀(2000)。體育教師課程價值取向對學生體育學習思考與學習態度之影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.簡良平(2002)。學校課程決定--理論與實證。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Siedentop, D.、Herkowitz, J.、Rink, J.(1984)。Elementary physical education methods。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentige-Hall。  new window
3.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉一民(2005)。運動哲學新論:實踐知識的想像痕跡。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Eisner, E. W.、Vallance, E.(1974)。Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum。Berkeley, California:McCutchan。  new window
6.Dewey, J.(1938)。Experience and education。New York, NY:Touchstone。  new window
7.甄曉蘭(20010000)。中小學課程改革與教學革新:學校課程發展與課程評鑑實務策略。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jewett, A. E.、Bain, L. L.、Ennis, C. D.(1995)。The curriculum process in physical education。Dubuque, IA。  new window
9.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York:Seabury Press。  new window
10.陳伯璋(2001)。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The arts and the creation of mind。Yale University Press。  new window
12.Habermas, Jürgen、Shapiro, Jeremy J.(1971)。Knowledge and Human Interests。Beacon Press。  new window
13.Houlihan, B.、劉宏裕、許光麂(2005)。運動社會學導論。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
14.簡良平(2004)。不同課程取向中教師課程實踐角色得探討。課程與教學硏究之發展與前瞻 \\ 中華民國課程與教學學會(主編)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hastie, P. A.(2003)。Teaching sport within physical education。Student learning in physical education \\ S. J. Silverman ; C. D. Ennis (eds.)。Champaign, IL。  new window
16.Schubert, W. H.(1990)。The questions of worth as central to curriculum empowerment。Teaching and thinking about curriculum \\ J. T. Sears ; J. D. Marshall (eds.)。New York。  new window
17.Shulman, L. S.(1991)。Joseph Jackson Schwab: 1909-1988。Remembering the university of Chicago: Teachers, scientists, and scholars \\ E. Shils (ed.)。Chicago。  new window
18.Thomas, J. R.、Lee, A. M.、Thomas, K. T.(1988)。Physical education for children: concept into practice。Champaign, IL。  new window
其他
1.許義雄(2003)。臺灣身體文化與體育的出路,http://140.122.72.11/ faculty/ihsiung/paper-1.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Greene, Maxine(1974)。Cognition, consciousness, and curriculum。Heighten consciousness, culture revolution, and curriculum theory。Berkeley, CA:Mccutchan。  new window
2.Macdonald, J. B.(1988)。Curriculum, consciousness, and social change。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, Arizona:Gorsuch Scarisbrick。  new window
3.Schwab, Joseph J.(1978)。The practical: A language for curriculum。Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Clandinin, D. Jean、Connelly, F. Michael(1992)。Teacher as curriculum maker。Handbook of research on curriculum。New York:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE