以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴
書刊名：	管理與系統
作者：	陳樹榮／賴奎魁
作者(外文)：	Chen, Shu-jung／Lai, Kuei-kuei
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	19:4
頁次：	頁589-623
主題關鍵詞：	自我技術網絡；知識地位；知識信賴；商品化；技術夥伴；Ego-centered technological network；Knowledge status；Knowledge reliability；Commercialization；Technology partnership
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:526

企業慎選核心技術商品化之合作廠商，以促進技術發展與生產效能，向來是科技廠商追求經營績效之一大課題。Stuart（1998）以半導體產業專利與專利引用資料，從技術市場結構的網絡觀點，由外向內（outside-in）提出一個組織技術利基位置與聯盟形成傾向因素的探討。本研究則以組織本身的核心技術能力觀點，由內向外（inside-out）建構一個自我基礎的技術網絡，提出一個篩選最佳技術合作廠商的評估程序，以增補Stuart outside-in的分析缺口。首先，本文從焦點公司的自我技術網絡中，建構公司技術知識地位（technological knowledge status; TKS）的評估指標，以篩選潛在的技術合作候選者。其次，再提出一個技術知識信賴（technological knowledge Reliability; TKR）指標，辨識最適的合作廠商。最後，以個案公司特定核心技術形成的技術網絡進行實證，發現同時具有較高TKS和TKR的技術跟隨公司是焦點公司商品化合作夥伴最好的選擇。同時，他們在參與焦點公司核心技術的發展過程中，也具有兩個特徵：（1）新興階段就已經開始進入；以及（2）他們的技術發展趨勢與焦點公司產生共同演化。

以文找文

To carefully choose the potential technological cooperation partner and to accelerate the success of technological development and commercialization are the major issues for high-tech manufacturers who pursue the best operation performance. Stuart (1998) used the data of semi-conductor's patents and patent citation, and from the network perspective of the structure of technological market, to bring up a tendency from outside-in study of the factors of an organization's technological niche that forms technology alliance. The article is from the perspective of an organization's internal core technology to establish an inside-out ego technological network, and bring up the suitable evaluation procedures to choose the best technological cooperation partner, which supplements the incomplete portion of Stuart's theory. Firstly, the article establishes the evaluation index of a company's Technological Knowledge Status (TKS) from ego-centered technology network to recognize the potential cooperation candidates. Secondly, to propose the other index of Technological Knowledge Reliability (TKR) to identify the best suited cooperation partner. Finally, to prove it by using a real Company's technological network formed by its specific core technology, and find out that the best partnership for commercialization will be for those technological followers and focal companies who are with higher TKS and TKR. Also, during the participation with focal core technology development, they possess two characteristics: (1) joining the technology development during the emerging stage; (2) the technology development trend was co-evolved with the focal company.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Duysters, G.、Kok, G.、Vaandrager, M.(1999)。Crafting Successful Strategic Technology Partnerships。R&D Management，29(4)，343-351。
2.	Faust, Katherine(1997)。Centrality in Affiliation Networks。Social Networks，19(2)，157-191。
3.	Lorrain, Francios、White, Harrison C.(1971)。Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks。Journal of Mathematical Sociology，1(1)，49-80。
4.	Harhoff, D.、Scherer, F. M.、Vopel, K.(2003)。Citations,Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights。Research Policy，32(8)，1343-1363。
5.	Lingua, D.G.(2005)。INPADOC: 30 years of endeavours yet unmapped territories remain。World Patent Information，27(2)，105-111。
6.	Stuart, T. E.(1998)。Network Position and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry。Administrative Science Quarterly，43(3)，668-698。
7.	Podolny, J. M.、Stuart, T. E.(1995)。A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change。American Journal of Sociology，100(5)，1224-1260。
8.	Nevens, T. M.、Summe, G. L.、Uttal, B.(199005)。Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do?。Harvard Business Review，68(3)，154-163。
9.	Von Wartburg, I.、Teichert, T.、Rost, K.(2005)。Inventive Progress Measured by Multi-stage Patent Citation Analysis。Research Policy，34(10)，1591-1607。
10.	Long, C.(2002)。Patent signals。University of Chicago Law Review，69(2)，625-679。
11.	Singh, K.(1997)。The impact of technological complexity and inter-firm cooperation on business survival。Academy of Management Journal，40(2)，339-367。
12.	Berkowitz, L.(1993)。Getting the most from your patents。Research Technology Management，36(2)，26-31。
13.	McPherson, J. M.(1983)。An ecology of affiliation。American Sociological Review，48(4)，519-535。
14.	Arundel, A.、Steinmueller, E.(1998)。The use of patent databases by European small and medium-sized enterprises。Technology Analysis & Strategic Management，10(2)，157-173。
15.	Bilgen, Bilge、Ozkarahan, Irem(2004)。Strategic and Operational Production Distribution Models: a Review。The International Journal of Technology Management，28(2)，151-171。
16.	Faust, K.、Wasserman, S.(1992)。Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis。Journal of Quantitative Anthropology，4(1)，23-78。
17.	Lin, N.(1978)。Analyzing the instrumental uses of social relations in the context of social structure。Sociological Methods and Research，7(2)，149-166。
18.	Tsai, Chien-Tzu(2006)。Exploring the Practice of SMEs’ Patent Management in Taiwan: A Case Study of IC Design Companies。Taiwan Academy of Management Journal，6(2)，267-280。
19.	Wolff, Michael F.(1994)。Building trust in alliances。Research Technology Management，37(3)，12-15。
20.	McPherson, Miller、Smith-Lovin, Lynn、Cook, James M.(2001)。Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks。Annual Review of Sociology，27(1)，415-444。
21.	Podolny, Joe M.、Stuart, Toby E.、Hannan, Michael T.(1996)。Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991。American Journal of Sociology，102(3)，659-689。
22.	Dosi, Giovanni(1982)。Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories。Research Policy，11(3)，147-162。
23.	Wenger, E. C.、Snyder, W. M.(2000)。Communities of practice: The organizational frontier。Harvard Business Review，78(1)，139-146。
24.	Ahuja, G.(2000)。Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study。Administrative Science Quarterly，45(3)，425-455。
25.	Cassiman, B.、Veugelers, R.(2006)。In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition。Management Science，52(1)，68-82。
26.	Stuart, T. E.、Podolny, J. M.(1996)。Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities。Strategic Management Journal，17(S1)，21-38。
27.	Rindfleisch, A.、Moorman, C.(2001)。The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective。Journal of Marketing，65(2)，1-18。
28.	Smilor, Raymond W.、Gibson, David V.(1991)。Accelerating Technology Transfer in R&D Consortia。Research-Technology Management，34(1)，44-49。
29.	Gulati, Ranjay(1995)。Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances。The Academy of Management Journal，38(1)，85-112。
30.	Friedkin, N.(1980)。A test of structural features of Granovetter's strength of weak ties theory。Social Networks，2(4)，411-422。
31.	Cantwell, J.、Vertova, G.(2004)。Historical evolution of technological diversification。Research Policy，33(3)，511-529。
32.	Uzzi, Brian(1997)。Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness。Administrative Science Quarterly，42(1)，35-67。
33.	Prahalad, Coimbatore K.、Hamel, Gary(1990)。The core competence of the corporation。Harvard Business Review，68(3)，79-91。
34.	Granovetter, Mark S.(1983)。The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited。Sociological Theory，1，201-233。
35.	Grant, Robert M.(1996)。Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm。Strategic Management Journal，17(Suppl 2)，109-122。
36.	Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology，78(6)，1360-1380。
37.	Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。
38.	Fleming, L.、Sorenson, O.(2001)。Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data。Research Policy，30(7)，1019-1039。
39.	Dyer, Jeffrey H.、Singh, Harbir(1998)。The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage。Academy of Management Review，23(4)，660-679。
40.	Sorenson, O.、Rivkin, J. W.、Fleming, L.(2006)。Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow。Research Policy，35(7)，994-1017。
41.	Archibugi, D.(1992)。Patenting as an Indicator of Technological Innovation: A Review。Science and Public Policy，19(2)，357-368。
42.	Mowery, C. D.、Oxley , J. E.、Silverman, B. S.(1998)。Technological Overlap and Interfirm Cooperation: Implications for the Resource-based View of the Firm。Research Policy，27(5)，507-523。
43.	Simmons, E. S.(1995)。Patent Family Databases 10 Years Later。Database，18(3)，28-37。

圖書
1.	Burt, Ronald S.(2010)。Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
2.	Wenger, E.(1998)。Communities at practice: Learning, meaning, and identity。England：Cambridge University Press。
3.	Afuah, Allan(2003)。Innovation management: Strategies, implementation, and profits。New York：Oxford University Press。
4.	Wasserman, Stanley、Faust, Katherine(1994)。Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications。Cambridge University Press。
5.	Bright, J. R.(1980)。Practical Technology Forecasting: Concepts and Exercises。Austin, Texas：The Industrial Management Center。
6.	Jolly, V. K.(1997)。Commercializing New Technologies: Getting from Mind to Market。Boston：Harvard Business School Press。
7.	Hanneman, R. A.、Riddle, M.(2005)。Introduction to Social Network Methods。Riverside, California：University of California, Riverside。
8.	Basalla, George(1988)。The Evolution of Technology。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
9.	Leonard-Barton, D.、Dorothy, L.(1995)。Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation。Boston, Massachusetts：Harvard Business School Press。
10.	Bleeke, J.、Ernst, D.(1993)。Collaborating to Compete: Using Strategic Alliances and Acquisitions in the Global Marketplace。New York：John Wiley & Sons Inc。
11.	Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY：Schuster Inc.。
12.	Burt, Ronald S.(1992)。Structural Holes. Cambridge。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
13.	Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, Massachusetts：The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。

其他
1.	USPTO(2010)。Manual of Patent Examining Procedure，http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.htm。

圖書論文
1.	Krackhardt, D.(1994)。The strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations。Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action。Boston, MA。
2.	Lazarsfeld, P. F.、Merton, Robert K.(1954)。Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis。Freedom and Control。New York, NY：Van Nostrand。
3.	Rosenkopf, L.、Tushman, M. L.(1994)。The co-evolution of Technology and Organization。Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations。New York：Oxford University Press。
4.	Lakatos, Imre(1970)。Falsification and The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes。Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge。Cambridge University Press。
5.	Parker, B.、Zeira, Y.(1996)。Parent Company Characteristics and International Joint Ventures Success in England and the USA。Creating and Managing International Joint Ventures。London：Quorum Books。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例
2.	從互補性與增補性探討專利收購之研究--以Apple與Samsung智慧型手機為例
3.	專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例
4.	Exploring the Practice of SMEs' Patent Management in Taiwan: A Case Study of IC Design Companies

1.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識RFID新產品開發適合之合作廠商

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例
2.	從互補性與增補性探討專利收購之研究--以Apple與Samsung智慧型手機為例
3.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識RFID新產品開發適合之合作廠商
4.	從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例
5.	珠江三角洲與澳門樓市
6.	生物科技產業創新能力與企業價值之關聯性--廣告支出之調節效果
7.	核心代理問題與董監自利行為、研發效率之關聯性

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫