:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:檢視競爭性經費對大學發展的影響
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:范麗雪 引用關係
作者(外文):Fan, Li-hsueh
出版日期:2012
卷期:26
頁次:頁103-123
主題關鍵詞:競爭性經費績效導向大學發展Competitive fundingPerformance-orientedUniversity's development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:52
在有限的高等教育經費下,大學的績效責任備受重視,績效導向的競爭性經費也成為各國政府用以提升大學競爭力的方法。本研究首先以文獻探討競爭性經費的背景、分配方式與其對大學發展的影響,並以實際訪談政府單位、大學校長與大學學者三方面對於競爭性經費對大學發展之影響的看法。本文主要的研究發現有四:一、競爭性經費是激勵大學回應全球性競爭的一種方法,二、競爭性經費為大學帶來聲望並形成良性循環,三、競爭性經費讓大學回應政府目標並產生引導效果,四、競爭性經費讓大學在回應政府目標過程中產生負面效應。本研究認為競爭性經費是提升大學競爭力的一種工具,但優質的學術人員才是大學長期發展的關鍵成功因素。
With the limited higher education funding, accountability of universities become the important issue. Competitive funding is an instrument used by government to improve the university's competitiveness. This study firstly analyzes competitive funding by literature review. Secondly, this paper interviews the government department, principals of university and university scholars to understand their experience and opinions about the impact of competitive funding on university's development. The four main results are as follows: 1. competitive funding is the means to respond the global competition of higher education, 2. competitive funding brings the reputation and create positive circle, 3. competitive funding enforce universities to follow governmental goals, 4. competitive funding arise the side effect in the behavior of faculty and the university's development. The main argument of this paper is that competitive funding is merely a tool of improving the university's competitiveness, faculty qualifications is the key factor for university's long term development.
期刊論文
1.Liefner, I.(2003)。Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems。Higher Education,46(4),469-489。  new window
2.Orr, Dominic(2005)。Can performance-based funding and quality assurance solve the State vs. market conundrum。Higher Education Policy,18,31-50。  new window
3.陳振遠、樊國恕、蘇國瑋、何希慧、侯永琪、陳振宇、許文瑞(20110600)。發展國際一流大學及頂尖研究中心計畫之評估研析。研考雙月刊,35(3)=283,84-96。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jongbloed, B.、Vossensteyn, H.(2001)。Keeping up performances: an international survey of performance-based funding in higher education。Journal of higher education policy and management,23(2),127-145。  new window
圖書
1.蓋浙生(2008)。教育經濟與財政新論。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kaiser, F.、Vossensteyn, H.、Koelman, J.(2001)。Public funding of higher education: A comparative study of funding mechanisms in ten countries。Enschede:Center for Higher education Policy Studies。  new window
3.戴曉霞(2006)。世界一流大學之卓越與創新。臺北市:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Jongbloed, B.(2010)。Funding higher education: A view across Europe,http://www.utwente.nl。  new window
2.Eurydice European Unit(2008)。Higher education governance in Europe: Policies, structures, funding and academic staff,http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0_integral/091EN.pdf, 2013/09/30。  new window
3.范麗雪(2010)。歐洲高等教育經費分配機制之現況、發展趨勢與啓示。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2005)。發展國際一流大學及頂尖硏究中心計畫。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2009)。高等教育現況檢討及追求卓越之發展策略專案報告。  延伸查詢new window
6.監察院(2010)。糾正案文。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉阿榮(2009)。競爭型經費對高等教育發展的影響。  延伸查詢new window
8.Albrecht, D., & Ziderman, A.(1992)。Funding mechanisms for higher education: Financing for stability, efficiency and responsiveness。  new window
9.Frolich, N., & Strom, B.(2008)。Higher education funding and incentives: Evidence from the norwegian funding reform。  new window
10.Harnisch, T.(2011)。Performance-based Funding: A Re-Emerging Strategy in Public Higher Education Financing。  new window
11.Hauptman, A.(2006)。Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education。  new window
12.Layzell, D.(1998)。Linking performance to funding outcomes for public institutions of higher education: The US experience。  new window
13.Mok, K., & Chan, Y.(2008)。International benchmarking with the best universities: Policy and practice in Mainland China and Taiwan。  new window
14.Nkrumah-Young, K., & Powell, P.(2008)。Resource allocation models and accountability: A Jamaican case study。  new window
15.Orr, D., Jaeger, M., & Schwarzenberger, A.(2007)。Performance-based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education。  new window
16.Shin, J.(2010)。Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S.。  new window
17.Sorlin, S.(2007)。Funding diversity: Performance-based funding regimes as drivers of differentiation in Higher Education Systems。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE