國際政治經濟學中的不列顛學派--British? Global? And Critical?_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	國際政治經濟學中的不列顛學派--British? Global? And Critical?
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	曾怡仁
作者(外文)：	Dzeng, Yi-ren
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	51:4
頁次：	頁1-33
主題關鍵詞：	不列顛學派；批判理論；美國學派；國際政治經濟學；國際關係；American school；British school；Critical theory；International political economy；International relations
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:26

國際政治經濟學（簡稱國政經）自70年代開始發展以來，不僅呈現出理論（自由主義、重商主義與馬克思主義）與研究途徑（理性主義與反思主義）的競逐，同時也有美國（American School）與不列顛學派（British School）間關於學科定位、研究議題與方法論上的差別。本文主要目的在於從三個面向來介紹及探討國政經的不列顛學派：一、為何該學派被稱為British School？與國際關係英國學派（English School）有何差別？二、不列顛學派學者偏好以「全球政治經濟學」（Global Political Economy）取代「國際政治經濟學」（International Political Economy）作為學科名稱，「Global」和「International」到底有何不同？僅涉及世界經濟生產方式的改變？還是包括研究議題與研究方法上的變遷？三、不列顛學派亦被稱為「批判的國際政治經濟學」（Critical IPE），「Critical」的意涵為何？其和國際關係批判理論（Critical Theory of International Relations）有何異同？經由這三組問題的討論，冀望可以對國政經不列顛學派有較充分的理解。

以文找文

Since the 1970s, the International Political Economy (IPE)has explored various research methodologies and methods. However, the disciplinary boundary of IPE is still controversial. The main purpose of this article is to discuss the British School of IPE from three dimensions. First, why is this school called "British?" Are there differences between the British School and the English School of international relations? Secondly, British School scholars prefer to call this new discipline the" Global Political Economy (GPE)"instead of "International Political Economy." Thus, what is the underlying meaning of "Global?" Does it require the use of different research methodology? Thirdly, the British School is often viewed as the "Critical International Political Economy (Critical IPE)". What does "Critical" represent here? What are the differences and similarities of the Critical IPE and the Critical Theory of International Relations? The author hopes that the discussion of these three dimensions could help us further understand the British School of IPE.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Strange, Susan(1987)。The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony。International Organization，41(4)，551-574。
2.	Jones, R. E.(1981)。The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure。Review of International Studies，7(1)，1-13。
3.	Keohane, Robert O.(2009)。The Old IPE and the New。Review of International Political Economy，16(1)，34-46。
4.	Murphy, Craig N.、Nelson, Douglas R.(2001)。International Political Economy: A Tale of Two Heterodoxies。British Journal of Politics and International Relations，3(3)，393-412。
5.	Underhill, G. R. D.(2000)。States, Market, and Global Political Economy: Genealogy of an (Inter-?) Discipline。International Affairs，76(4)，805-824。
6.	Waylen, G.(2006)。You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue Between Feminists and (Critical)IPE。Review of International Studies，32(1)，145-164。
7.	Bull, Hedley(1966)。International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach。World Politics，18(3)，361-177。
8.	Ruggie, John Gerard(1982)。International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order。International Organization，36(2)，379-415。
9.	Cox, Robert W.(1981)。Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，10(2)，126-155。
10.	Putnam, Robert David(1988)。Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games。International Organization，42(3)，427-460。
11.	Strange, Susan(1970)。International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Mutual Neglect。International Affairs，46(2)，304-315。

圖書
1.	Stephen Gill(1993)。Epistemology, Ontology, and the Italian School。Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations。New York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	朱天飆(2005)。比較政治經濟學。北京：北京大學出版社。延伸查詢
3.	Wallerstein, Immanuel(1984)。The Politics of the World-Economy。The Politics of the World-Economy。Cambridge。
4.	Arrighi, Giovanni、Silver, Beverly J.(1999)。Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。
5.	Cox, Robert W.、Sinclair, Timothy J.(1996)。Approaches to World Order。Cambridge University Press。
6.	Cox, Robert W.(1987)。Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History。New York：Columbia University Press。
7.	Cohen, Benjamin J.(2008)。International Political Economy: An Intellectual History。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。
8.	Leysens, A.(2008)。The Critical Theory of Robert W. Cox Fugitive or Guru?。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
9.	Strange, Susan(1988)。States and Markets。London：Pinter。
10.	Oren, Ido(2003)。Our Enemies and Us: America's Rivalries and the Making of Political Science。Ithaca, N.Y.：Cornell University Press。
11.	Gilpin, Robert(1975)。U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment。New York, NY：Basic Books。
12.	Baylis, John、Smith, Steve(1997)。The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations。Oxford University Press。
13.	Collingwood, Robin George(1994)。The Idea of History: Revised Edition with Lectures 1926-1928。Cambridge：Oxford University Press。
14.	Jackson , Robert、Sørensen, George(1999)。Introduction to International Relations。New York:：Oxford University Press。
15.	Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。New York：Harmondsworth：The Penguin Group：Maxwell McMillan International：Free Press。
16.	Phillips, Louise J.、Jørgensen, Marianne W.(2002)。Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method。Sage。
17.	Finnemore, Martha(1996)。Defining National Interests in International Society。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。
18.	Collingwood, R. G.、陳明福(1984)。歷史的理念。台北：桂冠圖書公司。延伸查詢
19.	Gilpin, Robert G.(2001)。Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order。Princeton University Press。
20.	Gilpin, Robert、Gilpin, Jean M.(1987)。The Political Economy of International Relations。Princeton University Press。
21.	Guzzini, Stefano(1998)。Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold。Routledge。
22.	Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。
23.	Strange, Susan(1996)。The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy。Cambridge University Press。
24.	Gilpin, Robert(1981)。War and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。
25.	Linklater, Andrew(1990)。Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations。London：The Macmillan Press。
26.	Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。
27.	Goldstein, Judith L.(1993)。Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy。New York：Cornell University Press。
28.	Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。

其他
1.	李濱(2010)。解讀斯特蘭奇的國際政治經濟學思想。延伸查詢
2.	葛蘭西(1992)。葛蘭西文選，北京：人民出版社。延伸查詢
3.	Abbott, Jason P. and Owen Worth(2002)。Introduction: The ‘Many Worlds’ of Critical International Political Economy，New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
4.	Bates, Robert H.(1997)。Open-Economy Politics: The Political Economy of the World Coffee Trade，Princeton：Princeton University Press。
5.	Bull, Hedley(1997)。The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics，London：Macmillan。
6.	Buzan, Barry(1999)。The English School as a Research Program: An Overview, and a Proposal for Reconvening，Manchester：Manchester University。
7.	Chan, Stephen and Jarrod Wiener, eds.(1999)。Theorizing in International Relations: Contemporary Theorists and Their Critics，Lewiston：The Edwin Mellen Press。
8.	Cohen, Benjamin J.(2007)。The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE So Different。
9.	Cox, Robert W.(1992)。Toward a Post-hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
10.	Cox, Robert W.(1996)。Realism, Positivism and Historicism，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
11.	Cox, Robert W.。Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method。
12.	Cox, Robert W.(2009)。The ‘British School’ in the Global Context。
13.	Czaputowicz, Jacek(2003)。The English School of International Relations and its Approach to European Integration。
14.	Diez, Thomas and Richard G. Whitman(2002)。Analysing European Integration: Reflecting on the English School: Scenarios for an Encounter。
15.	Gill, Stephen(1993)。Gramsci, Hegemony and Materialism，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
16.	Gourevitch, Peter(1978)。The Second Image Reversed: International Sources of Domestic Politics。
17.	Higgot, Richard and Matthew Watson(2008)。All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe: Professor Cohen’s Tansatlantic Voyage in IPE。
18.	Hoffmann, Stanley(1977)。An American Social Science: International Relations。
19.	Huntington, Samuel(1997)。The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order，New York：Simon & Schuster。
20.	Katzenstein, Peter, ed.(1978)。Between Power and Plenty，Madison：University of Wisconsin。
21.	Keyman, Fuat, Globalization, State(1997)。Identity/Difference: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Relations，New York：Humanities Press。
22.	Linklater, Andrew(1992)。The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View。
23.	May, Christopher(1999)。Structural Strangely: Susan Strange, Structural Power and International Political Economy，Lewiston：The Edwin Mellen Press。
24.	Murphy, Craig N. and Roger Tooze(1991)。Introduction，Boulder：Lynne Rienner Publishers。
25.	Oatley, Thomas(2006)。International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy，New York：Pearson Education Inc。
26.	O’Brien, Robert and Marc Williams(2004)。Global Political Economy: Evolution and Dynamics，New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
27.	Odell, John S.(1982)。U. S. International Monetary Policy: Markets, Power, and Ideas as Sources of Change，Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。
28.	Palan, Ronen, ed.(2000)。Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories，London：Routledge。
29.	Phillips, Nicola(2009)。The Slow Death of Pluralism。
30.	Ravenhill, John, ed.(2005)。Global Political Economy，Oxford：Oxford University Press。
31.	Ravenhill, John(2008)。“In search of the missing middle。
32.	Rogawski, Ronald(1987)。Political Cleavage and Changing Exposure to Trade。
33.	Strange, Susan(1983)。Structure，Value and Risk in the Study of the International Political Economy，London：Francis Pinter Publishers。
34.	Strange, Susan(1984)。Preface，London：George Allen & Unwin Press。
35.	Strange, Susan(1991)。An Eclectic Approach，Boulder：Lynne Rienner Publishers。
36.	Strange, Susan(1991)。The Eclectic Approach，Boulder：Lynne Rienner Publisher。
37.	Stubbs, Richard and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill, eds.(2006)。Political Economy and the Changing Global Order，Oxford：Oxford University Press。
38.	Van der Piji, Kees(1985)。Transnational Classes and International Relations，London：Routledge。

圖書論文
1.	Cox, Robert W.(1993)。Structural issues of global governance: Implications for Europe。Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。
2.	Strange, Susan(1995)。Political Economy and International Relations。International Relations Theory Today。Cambridge：Polity Press。
3.	Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bring the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research。Bringing the State Back In。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
4.	Cox, Robert W.(1986)。Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory。Neorealism and Its Critics。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	我國運動產業對兩岸經濟合作架構協議簽定之因應策略--以國際政治經濟學觀點觀之
2.	批判國際政治經濟學的發展、途徑與啟示
3.	國際政治經濟學的發展與政治經濟學之關係

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	先秦時期近指代詞的語言現象研究--以「此」、「斯」、「之」、「是」、「茲」為例
2.	論兒童傳記的傳主選擇
3.	古代海洋文學中的長鯨形象
4.	哈瑪星文化研究
5.	協力義務與納稅人基本權
6.	稅務調(檢)查權行使及其憲法界限
7.	實質課稅與納稅人權利保障
8.	「文明」之路--第1卷, 文明化下布農文化傳統之形塑(1895-1945)
9.	山海經：神話的故鄉
10.	漢語方言語音資料庫自動擴增補完方法
11.	「頭」的故事：歷史．身體．創傷敘事
12.	文化與國族認同之外：臺灣日治時期皇民文學重估
13.	張文環與《風月報》
14.	呂赫若的戲劇活動--其戲劇的挫折與文學的回歸

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫