:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:誰是主角?誰在觀看?--論清代戲曲中的崇禎之死
書刊名:戲劇研究
作者:華瑋
作者(外文):Hua, Wei
出版日期:2013
卷期:11
頁次:頁23-60
主題關鍵詞:清戲曲崇禎之死鐵冠圖桃花扇歷史劇Qing dramaThe death of ChongzhenTieguan tuTaohua shanHistorical drama
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:38
本文圍繞清順治迄道光計六部書寫崇禎之死的劇作(《鐵冠圖》、《桃花扇》、《虎口遺生》、《傭中人》、《芝龕記》和《帝女花》),探討戲劇再現歷史的政治意涵,以及時代對歷史再現的限制及影響。從罕見之清內廷演出抄本《鐵冠圖》與民間演出本的比較,可見歷史記憶如何因政治目的被刻意地操控和利用。而時代的遷移也影響了作者再現歷史時,對其擬想觀眾之情感指引的目的上的差異。從清初至晚清,書寫崇禎之死的文人戲曲在有關「崇禎之死」這一極具戲劇性的關目處理上詳略不一,展現著由「悼明」到至少是表面上包含「頌清」的轉變。對崇禎個人命運及其所代表之有明一代滅亡的感懷,至清中葉已然失去其作為劇作中心主旨的重要性。取而代之的,是一種「泛政治性的」對臣子百姓的忠義教化。至清後期,故國之感再度抬頭,並且夾雜著幾許對人生盛衰無常的感傷。本文結論並指出,同一題材的歷史劇間往往存在著互文性與對話性,且戲劇與政治的關連、文本與意識形態的關係在歷史劇裡尤其顯著。然而在同時,清代劇場裡的演出可能不受內廷、官僚、文人重新編排史事的影響。《審音鑑古錄》中的《鐵冠圖.煤山》身段譜,見證著文化藝術之超越時代氛圍與官方意識形態的穩定力量。
This essay deals with six plays from the Qing dynasty, written between 1644 and 1832, concerning the death of Ming Emperor Chongzhen: ”Tieguan tu”, ”Taohua shan”, ”Hukou yusheng”, ”Yongzhong ren”, ”Zhikan ji”, and ”Dinü hua”. It explores the political implications of dramatic representation of history, as well as the limitations and influence of the times on historical representation. By comparing a rare copy of ”Tieguan tu” that was performed in the Qing court with popular performances, it can be seen how historical memory was meticulously manipulated and utilized for political purposes. As historical changes also influenced dramatic representations of history, there were differences in the authors' motives of directing the emotions of their implied audiences. From the early to the late Qing, plays written by literati treated the highly dramatic event of Chongzhen's death with different approaches, directly or indirectly, fully or briefly. This reveals a transformation from grieving for the lost Ming dynasty to at least a prima facie intent to praise the Qing. The mourning for the personal fate of Chongzhen, as well as the fall of the Ming dynasty lost its predominance by the mid-Qing. Instead, a general political teaching of loyalty and righteousness for the ministers and subjects was emphasized. By the late Qing, longing for the former dynasty once again arose, with it, melancholy toward the impermanence of the human condition. This essay concludes by noting the existence of inter-textuality and dialogism among historical plays on the same topic. In addition, the relationships between drama and politics, between text and ideology are particularly evident in historical drama. However, at the same time, performances in Qing theatrical venues perhaps were not influenced by the imperial court, the bureaucrats, and the literati that tried to represent historical event from a new light. The performance text of ”Meishan” of the ”Tieguan tu”, i.e. the scene of Chongzhen's death, found in ”Shenyin jiangu lu” illustrates the stability and strength of art and culture to transcend the moods of the times as well as official ideology.
Other
1.孔尙任(1986)。桃花扇,上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.吳新雷(200301)。崑曲劇目發微。東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版),5(1),94-97。  延伸查詢new window
2.程宗駿(1992)。關於《表忠記》與《鐵冠圖》。藝術百家,3,111-113。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙景深(2003)。戲曲遺札五通。上海戲劇,9,37-38。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳新雷(1998)。論《桃花扇》的創作歷程及其思想意蘊。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。531-547。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張傳若(2010)。黃燮清與倚晴樓戲曲(碩士論文)。上海戲劇學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.江湖知音者、古潭。新刻精選南北時尙昆弋雅調。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1955)。鐵冠圖。綴白裘。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2001)。鐵冠圖。俗文學叢刊。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.鐵冠圖。  延伸查詢new window
5.鐵冠圖。  延伸查詢new window
6.周秦(2011)。崑戲集存。合肥:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.松排山人、龍岩子。鐵冠圖忠烈全傳。  延伸查詢new window
8.崑山國學保存會(1919)。崑曲粹存.初集。上海:朝記書莊。  延伸查詢new window
9.張紫東、中國崑曲博物館(2009)。崑劇手抄曲本一百冊。揚州:廣陵書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.琴隱翁(1987)。審音鑑古錄。善本戲曲叢刊。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃燮清(1857)。帝女花。倚晴樓全集。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃燮清(1857)。脊令原。倚晴樓全集。  延伸查詢new window
13.華瑋(201306)。新發現的《鐵冠圖.白氏盡節》。中華戲曲。  延伸查詢new window
14.董榕、蝸寄居士(2010)。芝龕記。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.遺民外史(1986)。虎口餘生。古本戲曲叢刊五集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.嚴敦易(1982)。元明清戲曲論集。中州書畫社。  延伸查詢new window
17.余漢東(199410)。中國戲曲表演藝術辭典。武漢:湖北辭書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.唐英、周育德(1987)。古柏堂戲曲集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.王利器(1981)。元明清三代禁毀小說戲曲史料。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.曾永義(1975)。中國古典戲劇論集。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.谷應泰(1994)。明史紀事本末。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Wilshire, Bruce(1982)。Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of Theatre as Metaphor。Bloomington, IN:Indiana UP。  new window
23.黃文暘、董康同(1992)。曲海總目提要。天津:河北省:天津古籍書店。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳永明(2011)。清代前期的政治認同與歷史書寫。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.吳梅、王衛民(1983)。吳梅戲曲論文集。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.劉廷璣(1969)。在園雜志。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.徐扶明(1986)。元明清戲曲探索。浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.周妙中(1987)。清代戲曲史。中州古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
30.陸萼庭(20050000)。清代戲曲與崑劇。臺北:國家。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.陸萼庭(1995)。清代戲曲家叢考。上海:學林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.叢兆桓(20120812)。叢兆桓先生北京家中。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE