臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：雙元自主性的共存與範疇優勢性運作機制 : 以訊息區辨表現降低共同方法變異
書刊名：中華心理學刊
作者：吳志文／葉光輝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Chih-wen／Yeh, Kuang-hui
出版日期：2011
卷期：53:1
頁次：頁59-77
主題關鍵詞：共存；訊息區辨表現；範疇優勢性；雙元自主；Coexistence；Domain-superiority；Dual autonomy model；Message
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:66
本研究主要目的在於以訊息區辨表現作為非自陳式的效標變項，透過不同情境操弄的兩個研究，再次驗證雙元自主性模型提出的共存性觀點，並且進一步探討雙元自主性各自有其優勢作用範疇的運作機制。首先，兩個研究的結果顯示：個體的個體化自主性功能主要發揮在與個人範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上；而其關係自主性功能主要作用在與人際範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上。其次，個體唯有已經發展出高度的雙元自主性，才能夠在強調獨立或和諧價值情境的促發下，有效地交互提取身上的個體化自主性與關係自主性，以因應情境需求而發揮相應優勢的訊息區辨表現，支持了模型主張雙元自主性可以共存在單一個體身上的理論觀點（研究二之一和研究二之二）；換言之，即便個體在情境下經驗到明確的目標需求，但如果個體缺乏對應目標需求的高自主性能力時，仍無法展現良好的訊結果。
By using objective dependent variables (performances on messages discernment) as criteria, the aims of this article are to reexamine the coexistence and domain-superiority claims of dual autonomy model (DAM) in two successive studies. The results showed that (1) all two studies reconfirmed the domain-superiority claim of DAM by manifesting that individuating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in intrapersonal domain situation, however relating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in interpersonal domain situation; (2) the effects of situation manipulations could be found only within the adolescents who have higher corresponding autonomous capacity; this means that individuating autonomy and relating autonomy could be coexisting within an individual and an individual is capable of switching these two autonomy in different situations appeal (in study 2A and study 2B); (3) even under the situations in activating the pursuing of individuating/relating related goal, if the adolescences who do not hold the corresponding autonomous capacity, when compare to the adolescents of control group, they still cannot perform higher messages discernment significantly in the task (in study 2B). That is, the extent of performance on messages discernment was the outcome of the interacting effect between situational activation and individual’s autonomous capacity.
期刊論文
1.Gardner, W. L.、Gabriel, S.、Lee, Y.(1999.)。“I” value freedom, but “We” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment。Psychological Science，10，321-326。  new window
2.Kagitcibasi, C.(2005)。Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology，36(4)，403-422。  new window
3.Beyers, W.、Goossens, L.、Vansant, I.、Moors, E.(2003)。A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency。Journal of Youth and Adolescence，32，351-365。  new window
4.Yeh, Kuang-Hui、Bedford, Olwen、Yang, Yung-Jui(2009)。A cross-cultural comparison of the coexistence and domain superiority of individuating and relating autonomy。International Journal of Psychology，44(3)，213-221。  new window
5.Yeh, K. H.、Yang, Y. J.(2006)。Construct validation of individuating and relating autonomy orientations in culturally Chinese adolescents。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，9(2)，148-160。  new window
6.Trafimow, David、Triandis, Harry C.、Goto, Sharon G.(1991)。Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self。Journal of Personality & Social Psychology，60(5)，649-655。  new window
7.Ryan, R. M.(1995)。Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes。Journal of Personality，63(3)，397-427。  new window
8.Marcia, J. E.(1966)。Development and Validation of Ego-identity Status。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，3(5)，551-558。  new window
9.Hong, Ying Yi、Morris, Michael W.、Chiu, Chi Yue、Benet-Martínez, Verónica(2000)。Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition。American Psychologist，55(7)，709-720。  new window
10.Petty, Richard E.、Cacioppo, John T.(1986)。The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology，19，123-205。  new window
11.吳佳煇、林以正(20051200)。中庸思維量表的編製。本土心理學研究，24，247-300。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Petty, Richard E.、Cacioppo, John T.(1990)。Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Integration。Psychological Bulletin，107(3)，367-374。  new window
13.Aaker, Jennifer L.、Lee, Angela Y.(2001)。"I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion。Journal of Consumer Research，28(1)，33-49。  new window
14.Brewer, Marilynn B.、Gardner, Wendi W.(1996)。Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，71(1)，83-93。  new window
圖書
1.Erikson, Erik H.(1962)。Young Man Luther: A Study in Psychoanalysis and History。New York：W. W. Norton。  new window
其他
1.邱佳椿、廖芷妤、侯明賢(2003)。綜合高中學生生涯規劃輔導之探討。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃子騰(1998)。終生學習與全面品管。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊中芳(2001)。中國人的世界觀：中庸實踐思維初探。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊國樞(1993)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存。  延伸查詢new window
5.Baltes, M. M., & Silverberg, S. B.(1994)。The dynamics between dependency and autonomy: Illustrations across the life span。  new window
6.Chen, S. W., & Chou, S. H.(2003)。Effects and patterns of self-presentation in achievement events。  new window
7.Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U.(2003)。Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and wellbeing。  new window
8.Cross, S. E., & Madson, L.(1997)。Models of the self: Self-construals and gender。  new window
9.Hwang, K. K.。Life goals, achievement motivation and value of effort in Confucian society。  new window
10.Kwan, V. S., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M.(1997)。Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem。  new window
11.Miller, J. G.(2003)。Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development。  new window
12.Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y.(1995)。A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure。  new window
13.Noller, P.(1994)。Relationships with parents in adolescence: Process and outcome。  new window
14.Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T.(1993)。Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for contextinduced contrast。  new window
15.Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P.(1992)。The effect of agency and communality on self-esteem: Gender differences in longitudinal data。  new window
16.Yeh, K. H., Liu, Y. L., & Huang, H. S.(2003)。Individuating and relating: Two autonomy orientations in Chinese adolescents。  new window
圖書論文
1.Markus, H. R.、Kitayama, S. K.(2003)。Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action。Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self。Lincoln, NE：University of Nebraska Press。  new window
2.Yeh, K. H.、Liu, Y. L.、Huang, H. S.、Yang, Y. J.(2007)。Individuating and relating autonomy in culturally Chinese adolescents。Casting the individual in societal and cultural contexts。Seoul：Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing。  new window
3.Petty, R. E.、Wegener, D. T.(1999)。The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies。Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
4.Silverberg, S. B.、Gondoli, D. M.(1996)。Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective。Advances in adolescent development: Vol. 8. Psychosocial development in adolescence。Newbury Park：CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1065（臺灣：1064，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67796548
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上