:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用芝加哥模式之網路藝術教學:以國小四年級社會學習領域為例
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:鄭月秀 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Giffen Yueh-hsiu
出版日期:2012
卷期:58:4
頁次:頁1-50
主題關鍵詞:藝術融入教育社會學習領域網路集體藝術創作芝加哥模式Arts infused educationSocial studiesCollaborative online art creationThe CAPE model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:77
本研究以芝加哥模式(CAPE model)的探究、合作、紀實以及省思等步驟做為教學設計的架構,發展出藝術融入課程設計的模式理念,再以此模式做為網路藝術導入社會學習領域的課程設計依據。以行動研究為執行的方法,透過插角國小和鎮南國小四年級社會學習領域授課教師與學童的合作參與過程,完成「網路集體藝術創作融入課程」的行動方案。本研究之特色在於,以新媒體藝術型態融入課程的概念,結合CAPE模式與大觀念統整課程模式,將網路集體創作的四項特色:參與的遊戲性、作品形式的成長變化性、藝術的動詞性,以及作者權的移轉性等概念,轉化成國小四年級社會學習領域的能力指標,讓學童經由藝術參與的過程,提升資訊素材使用的能力、培養美學素養的內化、增加學習樂趣、提升學習成效,進而培養出具備創新和創意的二十一世紀人才。期望藉此研究的執行,得以引入並測試CAPE模式的在地化運用,提出藝術融入學科的具體教學策略與可行性,做為未來相關學術和教學的實務參考。
To develop an arts intergraded curriculum model, this study used the CAPE model's inquiry, collaboration, documentation, and reflection as a teaching framework, and then combined features of online arts into the curriculum design of social studies classes. Through partnership with Chajiao and ZhenNan Elementary Schools, this action research involved the students and teachers from the fourth-grade classes in the process of completing the "Online Collaborative Arts Creation Infused Curriculum." The concept of four online features of collaborative creation, such as the playing participation, the growth of the art form, the verbality of art, and the transferring of authorship, was transformed and integrated into an Academic Attainment Indicators of the forth-grade social studies classes. Due to the implementation of this new curriculum model, the students not only gained academic knowledge, but also became more capable of using information materials and hi-tech products. They also internalized artistic sensitivities and increased interests in learning, thus enhancing the effectiveness of their learning ability. This in turn, might help cultivate creative and innovative talents for the 21st century.
期刊論文
1.陳育淳(20061000)。性別議題融入藝術教育之統整課程行動研究實例。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),91-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.趙惠玲(20050500)。臺灣地區兒童與青少年視覺影像反應研究。藝術教育研究,9,33-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Adu-Agyem, J.、Enti, M.、Peligah, Y. S.(2009)。Enhancing children’s learning: The art perspective。International Journal of Education through Art,5,143-155。  new window
4.Chen, Y. C.(2003)。A study on an integrated curriculum for visual culture: Using gender role issues as an example。The International Journal of Art Education,1(2),81-111。  new window
5.Coutts, G.、Soden, R.、Seagraves, L.(2009)。The way they see it: An evaluation of the arts across the curriculum project。International Journal of Art & Design Education,28,194-206。  new window
6.Hetland, L.、Winner, E.(2001)。The arts and academic achievement: What the evidence shows。Arts Education Policy Review,102(5),3-6。  new window
7.Hwang, R. L.(2006)。Five trends of school’s arts education reform in Taiwan。International Journal of Art and Design Education,25(2),175-181。  new window
8.Sahasrabudhe, P.(2006)。Design for learning through the arts。International Journal of Education Through Art,2(2),77-92。  new window
9.Scott, L.(2008)。Art Smarts: Lessons learned about investing in a well-rounded education。Education Digest,74(1),5。  new window
會議論文
1.黃壬來(2006)。國際視覺藝術教育趨勢。2006年全國藝術教育展研討會,花蓮教育大學 。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2005)。藝術教育政策白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Read, Herbert、呂廷和(2007)。透過藝術的教育。藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2004)。藝術教育政策白皮書。臺北市:國立臺灣藝術教育館。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭月秀(2007)。網路藝術。臺北市:藝術家。  延伸查詢new window
5.Arts Council England(2004)。The impact of the arts: Some research evidence.。London:Arts Council England。  new window
6.Arts Council England(2009)。Annual review 2009。London:Arts Council England。  new window
7.Arts Education Partnership(2001)。Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development。Washington, DC:Arts Education Partnership。  new window
8.Arts Education Partnership(2006)。Making a case for the arts: How and why the arts are critical to student achievement and better schools。Washington, DC:Arts Education Partnership。  new window
9.Catterall, J. S.、Waldorf, L.(1999)。Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning。Washington, DC:Chicago Arts Partnership in Education。  new window
10.Cochrane, P.、Cockett, M.(2007)。Building a creative school: A dynamic approach to school development。Staffordshire:Trentham Books。  new window
11.National Arts Council Singapore(2009)。Renaissance city report iii。Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts。  new window
12.Soden, R.、Seagraves, L.、Coutts, G.(2008)。Evaluation of the arts across the curriculum project。Glasgow, Scotland:University of Strathclyde。  new window
單篇論文
1.鄭月秀,鄭淳文,周文修(2012)。藝術融入課程設計模式。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.帝門藝術教育基金會(2008)。藝術家駐村計畫,http://www.deoa.org.tw/events/1253/main.html, 2011/04/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立台灣藝術教育館(2010)。獎勵藝術教育創新教學設計及教材研究,http://www.arte.gov.tw/pro2_comp.asp?KeyID=11 [National Taiwan Arts Education Center (2011)。  延伸查詢new window
3.國民教育社群網(2009)。97年國民中小學課程綱要,http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326 [Taiwan Elementary and Secondary Education Community (2009)。  new window
4.國藝會(2008)。藝教於樂,透過藝術學習專案,http://www.ncaf.org.tw [National Culture and Arts Foundation (2008), 2011/09/18。  延伸查詢new window
5.ArtsSmarts(2009)。ArtsSmarts: Annual report 2008,http://www.artssmarts.ca/en/about-us/about-us.aspx, 2010/12/03。  new window
6.Chicago Arts Partnership in Education(2009)。Chicago arts partnership in education。  new window
7.CAPE(2008)。2007-2008 CAPE annual report,http://www.capeweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/cape_annual08.pdf, 2010/11/12。  new window
8.Creative Partnerships(2006)。Creative partnerships 2010/08/28。  new window
9.Foote, J.(2003)。Mystic exchange, media literacy & net art,http://babel.massart.edu/~jfoote/presentationnetart.html, 2009/10/10。  new window
10.Government of South Australia(2007)。ARTSsmart: A strategy for arts education in south Australian schools and preschools 2003-2006 2010/11/12。  new window
11.Ofsted(2006)。Creative Partnerships: Initiative and impact,http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6312/1/Creative%20Partnerships%20initiative%20and%20impact%20(PDF%20format).pdf, 2010/08/28。  new window
12.Ruppert, S.(2006)。How the arts benefit student achievement,http://www.nasaa-arts.org/Research/Key-Topics/Arts-Education/critical-evidence.pdf, 2010/11/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.Catterall, J. S.(2002)。The Arts and the Transfer of Learning。Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development。Washington, D.C.:Arts Education Partnership。  new window
2.張華芸(2001)。培育未來人才,藝術不能缺席。天下雜誌2001年教育特刊V:美的學習,捕捉看不見的競爭力。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
1. 「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化
2. 書評:評S. J. Ball的《教育論辯》
3. 教育即文化框限:三位文化人類學者的教育觀點
4. 「互為主體師生關係」的教育學實踐:以東南亞移工自我敘事紀錄片教學為例
5. 中國菁英高中、秀異與全球功績主義:評[Yi-Lin Chiang (姜以琳)著], «Study Gods» (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022)
6. Content and Language Integrated Learning for Teaching the Theoretical Language of Sociology of Education to Preservice Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study
7. 重思學習障礙之定義與鑑定:一個特殊教育社會學的觀點
8. 教育行政作為效率控制或是公義解放?--R. Bates的批判理論對教育行政之啟示
9. 書評:從移動的時空看教育的脈絡:評2018年世界教育年鑑《不平均的教育時空:歷史社會學的概念、方法與實踐》
10. Effects of Social Influence and System Characteristics on Traceable Agriculture Product Reuse Intention of Elderly People: Integrating Trust and Attitude Using the Technology Acceptance Model
11. 評〈戰爭與臺灣的高等教育,1945~1990〉
12. 通識課程之研判思考能力的學習成效在校務研究之應用
13. 由教科書內容看臺灣教育社會學學科架構的發展
14. 高等教育社會學的研究與脈絡
15. 立法院外的春吶:太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象
 
QR Code
QRCODE