The Effect of Personal Religiosity on Attitudes toward Abortion, Divorce, and Gender Equality--Does Cultural Context Make a Difference?_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	The Effect of Personal Religiosity on Attitudes toward Abortion, Divorce, and Gender Equality--Does Cultural Context Make a Difference?
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	艾美‧亞當契克／林允安
作者(外文)：	Adamczyk, Amy／Lin, Yun-an
出版日期：	2013
卷期：	43:1
頁次：	頁213-253
主題關鍵詞：	宗教；墮胎；離婚；性別平等；文化；Religion；Abortion；Divorce；Gender equality；Culture
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:44

每個人對於墮胎、離婚以及性別平等的態度相當不同；這些差異大大地反映在各國的離婚法規、對女性進行墮胎的懲罰、及女性的政治代表性上面。儘管個人的宗教信仰常被認為能顯著地形塑每個人的態度，一國的經濟發展及政治穩定性也同樣被視為是影響性道德觀及性別平等的重要因素。本研究試圖從文化社會學及宗教社會學的角度，強調個人宗教觀與國家文化傾向的交互關係，以此解釋各國在墮胎、離婚、性別平等議題上的不同輿論觀點。本文使用世界價值觀調查的第四波資料，運用階層線性模型方法，研究結果支持「求生存或自我表現傾向」這個廣泛的文化軸線，以及個人的宗教參與程度，皆會形塑人們對於墮胎及離婚的態度。再者，相較於許多撒哈拉以南的非洲國家，在諸如美國等有較強自我表現文化傾向的國家中，個人宗教信仰對於墮胎、離婚、性別平等觀點的影響較鉅。

以文找文

Across the globe, people differ considerably in their attitudes about abortion, divorce, and gender equality. These differences are reflected in the diversity of laws regulating divorce, penalties for women obtaining abortions, and differences in women’s levels of political representation. While personal religious beliefs are often seen as having a significant role in shaping attitudes, economic development and political stability are also seen to be important predictors of attitudes about sexual morality and gender equality. This study draws on ideas from cultural sociology and the sociology of religion to address the interrelationship between personal religiosity and national cultural orientations to explain cross-national variation in public opinions about abortion, divorce, and gender equality. Using data from the fourth wave of the World Values Survey and hierarchical linear modeling techniques, support is found for a broad cultural axis of survival vs. self-expressive orientations, and personal religious involvement for shaping attitudes about abortion and divorce. Moreover, personal religious involvement appears to have a greater effect on attitudes about abortion, divorce, and gender equality in countries like the United States, which have a strong self-expressive cultural orientation, than in many Sub-Saharan African nations.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Adamczyk, A.、Felson, J.(2008)。Fetal positions: Unraveling the influence of religion on premarital pregnancy resolution。Social Science Quarterly，89(1)，17-38。
2.	Adamczyk, Amy、Pitt, Cassady(2009)。Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context。Social Science Research，38(2)，338-351。
3.	Baldassarri, D.、Gelman, A.(2008)。Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion。American Journal of Sociology，114(2)，408-446。
4.	Bergh, J.(2007)。Gender attitudes and modernization processes。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，19(1)，5-23。
5.	Burkett, S. R.、White, M.(1974)。Hellfire and delinquency: Another look。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion，13(4)，455-462。
6.	Danigelis, N.、Hardy, M.、Cutler, S.(2007)。Population aging, intracohort aging, and sociopolitical attitudes。American Sociological Review，72(5)，812-830。
7.	David, H. P.(1992)。Abortion in Europe, 1920-91: A public health perspective。Studies in Family Planning，23(1)，1-22。
8.	Finke, R.、Adamczyk, A.(2008)。Cross-national moral beliefs: The influence of national religious context。Sociological Quarterly，49(4)，617-652。
9.	Grim, B. J.、Finke, R.(2007)。Religious persecution in cross-national context: Clashing civilizations or regulated religious economies?。American Sociological Review，72(4)，633-658。
10.	Hadaway, C. K.、Elifson, K. W.、Perersen, D. M.(1984)。Religious involvement and drug use among urban adolescents。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion，23(2)，109-128。
11.	Inglehart, R.(2006)。Mapping global values。Comparative Sociology，5(2/3)，114-136。
12.	Inglehart, R.、Norris, P.、Welzel, C.(2002)。Gender equality and democracy。Comparative Sociology，1(3/4)，321-345。
13.	Jelen, T. G.、Wilcox, C.(2003)。Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda。Political Research Quarterly，56(4)，489-500。
14.	Moore, L. M.、Vanneman, R.(2003)。Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes。Social Forces，82(1)，115-139。
15.	Peek, C. W.、George, D. L.、Williams, L. S.(1991)。Gender and God's word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism。Social Forces，69(4)，1205-1221。
16.	Regnerus, M. D.(2003)。Moral communities and adolescent delinquency: Religious contexts and community social control。The Sociological Quarterly，44(4)，523-554。
17.	Scheepers, P.、Grotenhuis, M. T.、Van Der Slik, F.(2002)。Education, religiosity and moral attitudes: Explaining cross national effect differences。Sociology of Religion，63(2)，157-176。
18.	Scheepers, P.、Van Der Slik, F.(1998)。Religion and attitudes on moral issues: Effects of individual, spouse and parental characteristics。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion，37(4)，678-691。
19.	Scheitle, C.、Adamczyk, A.(2009)。It takes two: The interplay of individual and group theology on social embeddedness。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion，48(1)，16-29。
20.	Sedgh, G.、Henshaw, S. K.、Singh, S.、Bankole, A.、Drescher, J.(2007)。Legal abortion worldwide: Incidence and recent trends。International Family Planning Perspectives，33(3)，106-116。
21.	Stack, S.、Adamczyk, A.、Cao, L.(2010)。Survivalism and public opinion on criminality: A cross-national analysis of prostitution。Social Forces，88(4)，1703-1726。
22.	Stack, S.、Kposowa, A. J.(2006)。The effect of religiosity on tax fraud acceptability: A cross-national analysis。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion，45(3)，325-351。
23.	Stack, S.、Kposowa, A. J.(2008)。The association of suicide rates with individual-level suicide attitudes: A cross-national analysis。Social Science Quarterly，89(1)，39-59。
24.	Tittle, C. R.、Welch, M. R.(1983)。Religiosity and deviance: Toward a contingency theory of constraining effects。Social Forces，61(3)，653-682。
25.	Van Buuren, S.、Boshuizen, H. C.、Knook, D. L.(1999)。Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis。Statistics in Medicine，18(6)，681-694。
26.	Voicu, M.(2009)。Religion and gender across Europe。Social Compass，56(2)，144-162。
27.	Yuchtman-Yaar, E.、Alkalay, Y.(2007)。Religious zones, economic development and modern value orientations: Individual versus contextual effects。Social Science Research，36(2)，789-807。
28.	Banaszak, L. A.、Plutzer, E.(1993)。Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe。American Political Science Review，87(1)，147-157。
29.	Hayes, B. C.、McAllister, I.、Studlar, D. T.(2000)。Gender, postmaterialism and feminism in comparative perspective。International Political Science Review，21(4)，425-439。
30.	Kenworthy, Lane、Malami, Melissa(1999)。Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis。Social Forces，78(1)，235-269。
31.	Inglehart, Ronald、Baker, Wayne E.(2000)。Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values。American Sociological Review，65(1)，19-51。
32.	Breslow, N. E.、Clayton, D. G.(1993)。Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models。Journal of the American Statistical Association，88(421)，9-25。

圖書
1.	Finke, Roger、Stark, Rodney(1992)。The Churching of America 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy。New Brunswick, N. J.：Rutgers University Press。
2.	Durkheim, E.(1912)。The elementary forms of the religious life。New York：The Free Press。
3.	Raudenbush, S.、Bryk, A.、Cheong, Y. F.、Congdon, R.(2005)。HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling。Lincoln Wood, IL：Scientific Software International。
4.	Weber, M.(1904)。The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism。New York：Scribner's。
5.	Inglehart, R.(1990)。Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。
6.	Inglehart, Ronald、Norris, Pippa(2003)。Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World。Cambridge University Press。
7.	Allison, Paul D.(2001)。Missing data。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。
8.	Inglehart, Ronald(1997)。Modernization and Postmodernization: Culture, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。
9.	Stark, Rodney、Finke, Roger(2000)。Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion。University of California Press。
10.	Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods。Sage。

單篇論文
1.	Inglehart, R.(2004)。Subjective well-being rankings of 82 societies (based on combined Happiness and Life Satisfaction scores) 20110213。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	文化與市場效率性
2.	評James A. Benn, «Tea in China: A Religious and Cultural History» (茶在中國：宗教與文化史) (HK: Hong Kong University Press, 2015)
3.	郎尼根宗教交談思想在多元文化和宗教脈絡中的發展
4.	評陳懷宇，《動物與中古政治宗教秩序》(上海：上海古籍出版社，2012)
5.	The Study of Color Symbolization in Interior Design
6.	本土家事調解參與觀察--半自主社會場域觀點
7.	[評論]賴品超(Lai, Pan-chiu)，《多元、分歧與認同：神學與文化的探索(Plurality, Diversity and Identity: Explorations of Theology and Culture)》(臺北：臺灣基督教文藝、中原大學宗教研究所，2011)
8.	馬克思與宗教
9.	The I-Milieu: Its Implications for Culture and Thinking (2)
10.	Imaginierte Kulturen und Reaktive Selbstwahrnehmung: Islam, Europa, Deutschland
11.	The I-Milieu: Its Implications for Culture and Thinking (1)
12.	宗教、科學、文化反思錄
13.	由文化理論到社會變遷理論：評Clart, Philip & Charles B. Jones Edited. 2003. Religion in Modern Taiwan: Tradition and Innovation in a Changing Society.
14.	宗教作為一種社會文化體系的性質和作用
15.	論作為文化體系的周人宗教--以「二雅」、「周頌」為觀照文本

1.	郎尼根的方法與宗教交談：應用於亞洲的脈絡

1.	「《文化：宗教與人》系列論叢」序言

無相關著作

1.	社會資本、政體類型與新冠肺炎中的疫苗接種：87個國家／地區的初探
2.	臺灣民粹主義者與反菁英情緒：世界價值觀調查臺灣資料的分析
3.	國家認同對政治信任的影響研究：基於WVS2012的實證分析
4.	兩階段不完整取樣插補資料之調查設計
5.	性別相關制度與政策對於兩性政治涉入的效果：33個民主國家的經驗研究
6.	解釋中國社會差序政府信任：體制形塑與績效認知的視角

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫