臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」信度與效度分析研究
書刊名：測驗學刊
作者：王德蕙／李奕璇／曾芬蘭／宋曜廷 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Te-hui／Lee, Yi-hsuan／Tseng, Fen-lan／Sung, Yao-ting
出版日期：2013
卷期：60:1
頁次：頁151-184
主題關鍵詞：信度；效度；國民中學學生基本學力測驗；寫作測驗；Basic competence test for junior high school students；Reliability；Validity；Writing assessment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:139
「國民中學學生基本學力測驗」自2007年正式加考寫作測驗以來，外界對於寫作測驗的評分者一致性，以及每次只考一個題目是否足以評量到考生的寫作能力，始終非常的關心。加上國中基測屬於高風險測驗，考生人數眾多，影響極鉅，以及國內外在寫作測驗信效度研究上的不足，因此實有必要進行寫作測驗信效度之研究。本研究之研究目的有二：首先為探討「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」（簡稱「國中基測寫作測驗」）的信度，以類推性理論為主，輔以評分者一致率與評分者間相關等數據，作為驗證信度的依據；其次，蒐集命題設計、評分流程、寫作分數與其他效標的關聯等各種效度證據，以驗證寫作測驗之效度。期望透過本研究結果，一方面能提供測驗實務界關於高風險考試中如何監控與提升寫作測驗信度與效度的作法，另一方面可以讓社會相關人士了解「國中基測寫作測驗」的信度、效度之實徵證據。而研究結果也顯示「國中基測寫作測驗」確實具有良好之信度與效度。
Since writing assessment of Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students (BCTEST-WA) has been implemented from 2007, its reliability and validity has been one of the most concerning issues to public. Due to the reason that BCTEST-WA is a large-scale high-stake exam, but existing researches on reliability and validity of writing assessment are insufficient, the purpose of this study is to validate the reliability and validity of BCTEST-WA. Three approaches to validate the reliability include generalizability theory, raters’ consensus, and raters’ consistency. The exam validity was illustrated through collecting evidences based on test content, responses processes, and relations to other variables. The results show that BCTEST-WA, as a large-scale highstake exam, has high reliability and validity. This paper does not only present the evidences on the good reliability and validity of BCTEST-WA, but it also provides references on how to monitor and improve reliability and validity of high-stake writing assessments.
期刊論文
1.謝錫金(1984)。高中學生的寫作思維過程。語文雜誌，12，41-53。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huot, B.(1990)。Reliability, validity, and holistic scoring: What we know and what we need to know。College Composition and Communication，41，201-213。  new window
3.Kretchmar, Jennifer(2006)。Assessing the reliability of ratings used in undergraduate admission decisions。Journal of College Admission，192，10-15。  new window
4.Novak, J. R.、Herman, J. L.、Gearhart, M.(1996)。Establishing validity for performancebased assessments: An illustration for collections of student writing。The Journal of Educational Research，89(4)，220-233。  new window
5.Stemler, S. E.(2004)。A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability。Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation，9(4)。  new window
6.Traub, R. E.、Rowley, G. L.(1991)。Understanding reliability。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，10(1)，37-45。  new window
7.Wagner, D. A.(2004)。Literacy(ies), Culture(s), and development(s): The ethnographic challenge。Reading Research Quarterly，39，234-241。  new window
8.Gao, X.、Brennan, R. L.(2001)。Variability of estimated variance components and related statistics in a performance assessment。Applied Measurement in Education，14(2)，191-203。  new window
9.祝新華(1995)。語文能力結構研究。教育研究，1995(11)，54-60。  延伸查詢new window
10.Brennan, Robert L.(2000)。Performance assessments from the perspective of generalizability theory。Applied Psychological Measurement，24(4)，339-353。  new window
11.Brown, G. T. L.、Glasswell, K.、Harland, D.(2004)。Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system。Assessing Writing，9，105-121。  new window
會議論文
1.Bunch, M. B.、Littlefair, W.(1988)。Total score reliability in large-scale writing assessment。conference of the Education Commission of the States。CO。  new window
2.Fenton, R.、Straugh, T.、Stofflet, F.、Garrison, S.(2000)。Improving the validity and reliability of large scale writing assessment。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。  new window
研究報告
1.Chen, Eva、Niemi, David、Wang, Jia、Wang, Haiwen、Mirocha, Jim(2007)。Examining the generalizability of direct writing assessment tasks。National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California。  new window
圖書
1.朱曉斌(2007)。寫作教學心理學。杭州：浙江大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉雨(19950300)。寫作心理學。高雄：復文圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brennan, R. L.(2001)。Generalizability Theory。New York, NY：Springer-Verlag。  new window
4.Shavelson, Richard J.、Webb, Noreen M.(1991)。Generalizability Theory: A Primer。Newbury Park, California：Sage。  new window
5.Bereiter, Carl、Scardamalia, Marlene(1987)。The Psychology of Written Composition。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
6.Crocker, L.、Algina, J.(1986)。Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
7.American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hamp-Lyons, L.(1990)。Second language writing: Assessment issues。Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1018（臺灣：1000，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67904828
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上