:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業組織健康文化與組織健康促進效能之關係
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:林雅雯
作者(外文):Lin, Yea-wen
出版日期:2013
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁155-169
主題關鍵詞:組織健康文化健康促進效能職場健康促進Organizational health cultureHealth promotion effectivenessWorkplace health promotion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:227
  • 點閱點閱:70
目標:本研究從組織理論的角度切入,探討組織健康文化與企業主所關心之健康促進效能的關係,此效能包括健康促進規劃成效、產出、成果與品質四個面向。方法:以立意抽樣法選取了55家台灣企業,由企業中負責職場健康促進業務的人員填寫測量組織健康促進效能的組織問卷,並自每家企業中選取20位專職員工,共1,100人,填寫測量組織健康文化知覺的員工問卷。再將同一組織內員工的知覺得分透過聚合程序進行加總平均,產生各企業組織的組織健康文化得分。回收之有效問卷包含54份組織問卷與1,011份員工問卷,有效問卷回收率為91.91%。研究資料以SPSS 17.0進行描述性統計、相關分析與層級迴歸分析。結果:組織健康文化只有對健康促進規劃成效、健康促進產出等過程面指標及健康諮詢率有所影響。而對於病假率、意外事件發生率、健康促進活動出席率與滿意度等指標則無顯著影響。結論:組織健康文化對於公司的健康促進規劃與產出等成效有正向影響,表示組織健康文化是影響職場健康促進計畫成功的關鍵因素,透過組織健康文化的形塑,才能將健康促進的理念深耕於組織與部門之中。
Objectives: From the perspective of organizational theory, this study explored the relationship between organizational health culture and the effectiveness of health promotion activities of those organizations in four areas: planning effectiveness, production, outcome, and quality. Methods: Using purposive sampling, we selected 55 enterprises across Taiwan and asked service personnel who were responsible for workplace health promotion (WHP) to fill out a questionnaire that was designed to collect information about the effectiveness of their WHP. In addition, a sample of employee surveys (filled out by 20 full-time employees) was collected from each enterprise. These contained information about personal perceptions of organizational health culture. This information was provided by individual employees and aggregated into organizational-level data. Results: The results showed that organizational health culture had a significant impact on the effectiveness of the planning for and the production of health promotion activities; however, organizational health culture had no significant impact on indicators such as the rates of sick leave and accidents or on the level of satisfaction with and attendance at health promotion activities that served to evaluated both the outcome and quality of health promotion activities. Conclusions: Organizational health culture has made a positive impact on the planning and production of health promotion activities in organizations. This suggests that organizational health culture was a critical factor in the success of WHP. If there is a positive view of health culture in an organization, then the concept of health promotion will be deeply embedded in that organization and its departments.
期刊論文
1.Becker HS.(1982)。Culture: a sociological view。Yale Rev,71,513-527。  new window
2.Sun S.(2008)。Organizational culture and its themes。Int J Bus Manag,3,137-141。  new window
3.Golaszewski T、Hoebbel C、Crossley J、Foley G、Dorn J.(2008)。The reliability and validity of an organizational health culture audit。Am J Health Stud,23,116-142。  new window
4.Heward S、Hutchins C、Keleher H.(2007)。Organizational change-key to capacity building and effective health promotion。Health Promot Int,22,170-178。  new window
5.Kok G.(1993)。Why are so many health promotion programs ineffective?。Health Promot J Aust,3,12-17。  new window
6.Mullen PD、Green LW、Persinger GS(1985)。Clinical trials of patient education for chronic conditions: a comparative meta-analysis of intervention types。Prev Med,14,753-781。  new window
7.Burton, W. N.、Conti, D. J.、Chen, C. Y.、Schultz, A. B.、Edington, D. W.(1999)。The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity。J Occup Environ Med,41,863-877。  new window
8.Schultz, A. B.、Lu, C.、Barnett, T. E.(2002)。Influence of participation in a worksite health-promotion program on disability days。Journal of Occupational Environment Medicine,44,776-780。  new window
9.Gordon GG、DiTomaso N.(1992)。Predicting corporate performance organizational culture。J Manag Stud,29,783-798。  new window
10.Fielding JE、Piserchia PV.(1989)。Frequency of worksite health promotion activities。Am J Public Health,79,16-20。  new window
11.Saffold GS.(1998)。Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: moving beyond "strong" culture。Academy of Management Review,13,546-558。  new window
12.George JM.(1990)。Personality, affect, and behavior in group。JAppl Psychol,75,107-116。  new window
13.范國棟、李蘭(20080800)。職場健康促進:國際與臺灣經驗之比較。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,27(4),271-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Denison, D. R.、Mishra, A. K.(1995)。Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness。Organization Science,6(2),204-223。  new window
15.Wiener, Yoash(1988)。Forms of Value Systems: A Focus on Organizational Effectiveness and Cultural Change and Maintenance。Academy of Management Review,13(4),534-545。  new window
16.Sathe, Vijay(1983)。Implications of corporate culture: A manager's guide to action。Organizational Dynamics,12(2),4-23。  new window
17.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
18.郭建志(20050900)。職場健康心理學的機會與挑戰。應用心理研究,28,12-14。  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭伯壎(19930600)。組織價值觀與組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的關係:不同加權模式與差距模式之比較。中華心理學刊,35(1),43-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.洪瑞斌、李志鴻、周志明、劉兆明(20071200)。從組織文化角度探究健康組織之意涵。應用心理研究,36,151-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
22.Maas, Cora J. M.、Hox, Joop J.(2005)。Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling。Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences,1(3),86-92。  new window
23.Steers, Richard M.(1975)。Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness。Administrative Science Quarterly,20(4),546-558。  new window
24.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.郭信智、陳宏基(2010)。職場健康促進計畫執行之組織脈絡及其經濟性效益 (計畫編號:NSC 98-2511-S-214-001)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.顏童文(2007)。國民小學組織動態能耐、組織健康氣候與學校創新經營關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cutknecht DB、Cutknecht DM.(1990)。Building Productive Organizations Through Health and Wellness Program。Lanham:University Press of America。  new window
2.Allen J.(2002)。Building supportive cultural environments。O’Donnell MP ed. Health Promotion in the Workplace。New York:Delmar Publishers。  new window
3.Gibson, J. L.、Ivancevich, J. M.、Donnelly, J. H. Jr.、Konopaske, R.(2003)。Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Process。McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Zammuto, R. F.(1982)。Assessing organizational effectiveness: System change, adaptation, and strategy。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
5.溫福星、邱皓政(2011)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。新亞測驗評量暨技術研究中心:αβγ實驗室。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cameron, K. S.、Whetten, D. A.(1983)。Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Model。New York:Academic Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rousseau, D. M.(1985)。Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives。Research in Organizational Behavior。Greenwich, Connecticut:JAI Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 運動心理資本對高中運動員知覺自我運動表現影響:教練家長式領導行為的跨層次分析
2. 臺灣職場心理健康發展歷史之回顧與展望:以政府相關政策為主軸
3. 若即若離?探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
4. 知覺教育訓練成效與離職傾向關係之調節式中介模式:心理契約觀點
5. 雇主品牌管理與員工品牌權益:跨層次之中介與調節影響效果
6. 轉化型領導對群體成員企業社會責任價值觀的雙向影響:程序公正與領導者-部屬企業社會責任價值觀一致性的中介效果
7. 醫院護理主管領導行為、團隊健康氣候及護理人員職場幸福感之多層次研究:護理人員健康行為之中介效果驗證
8. 建言行為與員工創新行為績效:一個探討促進型建言、抑制型建言、領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型
9. 會考成績對就近入學影響之研究:多層次分析的取向
10. 職場護理師對口腔健康之推動
11. 應用日誌法探究餐飲業顧客無禮行為對服務人員情緒耗竭之影響:跨層次分析
12. 道德領導與員工建言行為:情感信任與團隊成員關係衝突知覺的中介角色研究
13. 參與學習過程經驗及組織脈絡因素對樂齡學習中心學習者績效表現知覺之影響:階層線性模式分析
14. 以組織動態能耐觀點建構臺灣檢察組織評核指標
15. 以策略觀點探討服務績效之多層次研究
 
1. 道德領導力對團隊績效與員工建言影響之探索 -以團隊關係衝突為跨層次中介模式
2. 以跨層次模型探討職涯使命感與組織公平氛圍對公部門員工個人工作行為之影響
3. 國民小學校長變革領導、動態能力與學校經營績效測量模式驗證及關係之研究
4. 跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
5. 威權領導對任務績效之影響:以LMX及部屬職場偏差行為為中介因子
6. 臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
7. 科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯:階層線性模式分析
8. 臺灣檢察組織評核指標之建構---以組織動態能耐為觀點
9. 台灣原住民地區國民小學校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能關係之研究
10. 國小組長知覺校長正向領導、學校組織健康、人境適配與工作幸福感之關係:階層線性模式的驗證
11. 高等學校組織內部行銷、知識管理與創新經營關係之研究—以廣東省為例
12. 公部門團隊成員行動化知識分享行為之研究-科技信任與雙元性知識分享之調節效果
13. 團隊中的自主性與成員效能:家長式領導的調節
14. 競爭氣候如何燃起員工績效?檢驗競爭氣候與競爭特質交互對工作重塑、工作敬業與工作績效的關係
15. 以多層次分析探討組織認同在個人-組織適配度與離職傾向之調節式中介效果
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE