:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市中小學校長科技領導之創新關切與科技接受度研究
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:戴建耘 引用關係陳宛非韓長澤賴慕回高曼婷
作者(外文):Dai, Chien-yunChen, Wan-feiHarn, Charng-tzerLai, Mu-huiKao, Man-ting
出版日期:2013
卷期:21:1
頁次:頁97-133
主題關鍵詞:科技接受模式3科技領導關切階層Technology acceptance model 3Technology leadershipConcern-based adoption model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:249
  • 點閱點閱:98
隨著資訊科技的發展與成熟,教育單位需因應時代潮流,透過資訊科技來融入教學、建置數位化學習環境與管理平臺。學校領導者需具備新思維高度關切科技發展趨勢,運用科技管理能力,提升學校經營管理成效,因此具體展現科技領導能力,成為校長重要關鍵能力之一。本研究旨在瞭解臺北市中小學校長在參加科技領導研習營後之「關切階層」與「科技接受」之程度,以及瞭解不同背景變項在依變項間之差異。研究方法是採用問卷調查法輔以訪談,以臺北市226所公立中小學中,參與研習營且全程參與的43位校長填答,有效樣本共40位,達93.00%。研究發現,校長對科技領導之關切程度,以「結果關切」為最高;擔任校長年資「4年以下」、「5 ~ 8 年」及「13年以上」者,在「電腦趣味性」之表現顯著的優於擔任校長年資「9 ~ 12年」者;在校長任職階層以「高中」的校長在「結果關切」與「主觀規範」之表現優於擔任「國小」者;學校規模「24班以下」和「49班以上」的校長,在「合作關切」、「知覺易用性」之表現顯著的優於學校規模「25~ 48班」者。
As information technology develops, in order to respond to the current trend, educational organizations use information technology in teaching and establish digital learning environment and management platform. School leaders require a new concept to be highly concerned about the trend regarding to technology development. They have to use their technology management ability to promote school management efficiency. Therefore, showing technology leadership ability concretely becomes one of a principal’s vital key abilities. The aims of the study lie in understanding the levels of “Innovation Concern” and “Technology Acceptance” after the principals in Taipei city participated in the Technology Leadership Workshop, and understanding the differences in terms of various background and dependent variables. This study primarily involved questionnaire survey complemented with interviews. Among 226 elementary, junior and senior high schools in Taipei City, there were 43 principals participating in the Technology Leadership Workshop, there are 40 effectives, reaching 93.00%. The results showed that, in terms of the principals’ Innovation Concern level toward technology leadership, the level of result concern was the highest. For principals with the career duration of less than four years, 5 to 8 years and over 13 years, their performances in computer playfulness were significantly better than principals with the service duration of 9 to 12 years. In terms of the level of school the principals served, the performances of senior high school principals in result concern and subjective norm were better than those of elementary school principals. For principals within school size of less than 24 classes and over 49 classes, their performances in collaboration concern and perceived ease of use were better than principals with school size of 25 ~ 48 classes.
期刊論文
1.林志隆、王郁文(2006)。南區國小初級資訊種子教師創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報,24,107-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.耿慶瑞、黃增隆、汪志堅(20060900)。互動性對科技接受模式之影響--以政府入口網站為例。商管科技季刊,7(3),509-530。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Vaughan, W.(2002)。Professional development and the adoption and implementation of new innovations: Do teacher concerns matter。International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning,6(5),1-14。  new window
4.邱郁文、方國定(20050300)。整合知覺玩興構面擴充資訊科技接受模式--以入口網站為例。資訊管理展望,7(1),37-54。  延伸查詢new window
5.張奕華、許丞芳(20090600)。國民中小學校長科技領導指標建構之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,7,23-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉美春、阮明淑(20070600)。使用者採用知識管理系統之影響因素研究--理論模型的比較取向。圖書資訊學刊,5(1/2),69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Checkley, K.(2000)。The contemporary principal: New skill for a new age。Education Update,42(3),1-6。  new window
8.Cory, S.(1990)。Can your district become an instructional technology leader?。School Administrator Special Issue: Computer Technology Report,17-19。  new window
9.Schultz, L. E.(2000)。Qualities of an exceptional leader。Human Systems Management,19(2),93-103。  new window
10.Sheppard, B.(1996)。Exploring the transforming nature of instructional leadership。Alberta Journal of Educational Research,42(4),325-344。  new window
11.Thompson, M. L.(1963)。Identifying anxieties experienced by student teachers。Journal of Teacher Education,14(4),435-439。  new window
12.Travers, R. M. W.、Rabinowitz, W.、Nemovicher, E.(1952)。The anxieties of a group of student teachers。Educational Administration and Supervision,38,368-375。  new window
13.Venkatesh, V.、Davis, F. D.(2000)。A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies。Management Science,46(2),186-204。  new window
14.Perugini, Marco、Bagozzi, Richard P.(2001)。The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour。British Journal of Social Psychology,40(1),79-98。  new window
15.林信志、湯凱雯、賴信志(20100100)。以科技接受模式探討大學生學習以網路教學系統製作數位教材之意圖和成效。數位學習科技期刊,2(1),60-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.洪新原、張麗敏、劉淑娟(20100400)。應用差異理論探討資訊系統使用者滿意度之研究--不同使用者觀點之比較。資訊管理學報,17(2),57-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡政道(20040400)。臺灣、香港與新加坡資訊教育之比較研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,30(1),114-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Reinen, I. J.、Plomp, T.(1997)。Information Technology and Gender Equality: A Contradiction in Terminus?。Computers & Education,28(2),65-78。  new window
19.張奕華(20061000)。科技領導理論基礎與培訓課程範例。教育研究,150,59-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Jewell, M. J.(1998)。The art and craft of technology leadership。Learning and Leading with Technology,26(4),46-47。  new window
21.Ray, D.(1992)。Educational technology leadership for the age of restructuring。The Computing Teacher,19(6),8-14。  new window
22.Roca, J. C.、Chiu, C.-M.、Martínez, F. J.(2006)。Understanding E-Learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,64(8),683-696。  new window
23.Venkatesh, Viswanath、Bala, Hillol(2008)。Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions。Decision Sciences,39(2),273-315。  new window
24.張明輝(20030400)。卓越校長的關鍵能力。社教雙月刊,114,15-19。  延伸查詢new window
25.秦夢群、張奕華(20060300)。校長科技領導層面與實施現況之研究。教育與心理研究,29(1),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Flanagan, L.、Jacobsen, M.(2003)。Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal。Journal of Educational Administration,41(2),124-142。  new window
27.Siegel, J.(1995)。The state of teacher training。Electronic Learning,14(8),43-53。  new window
28.謝文斌(20041000)。論析中小學校長專業發展的新面向:科技領導。中等教育,55(5),72-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Bailey, G. D.(1997)。What technology leaders need to know: The essential top 10 concepts for technology integration in 21st century。Learning & Leading with Technology,25(1),57-62。  new window
30.孫志麟、陳建銘(20070400)。學校組織變革中的教師關注:發展階段與類型分析。師大學報. 教育類,52(1),159-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Amoako-Gyampah, K.、Salam, A. F.(2004)。An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment。Information & Management,41(6),731-745。  new window
32.張奕華、吳怡佳(20080300)。校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),171-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.張奕華(20031000)。美國中小學校長領導的新趨勢--科技領導。教育研究,114,147-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.葉連祺(20030800)。科技領導。教育研究,112,151-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Legris, P.、Ingham, J.、Collerette, P.(2003)。Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model。Information & Management,40(3),191-204。  new window
36.吳清山、林天祐(20060800)。科技領導。教育資料與研究,71,195-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Fuller, Frances F.(1969)。Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization。American Educational Research Journal,6(2),207-226。  new window
38.林國亮、吳明隆(20060900)。學校行政主管資訊科技應用素養與學校經營績效之關係研究--以高雄市國民小學為例。學校行政,45,1-25。  延伸查詢new window
39.Venkatesh, Viswanath(2000)。Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model。Information Systems Research,11(4),342-365。  new window
40.Pavlou, Paul A.(2003)。Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model。International Journal of Electronic Commerce,7(3),101-134。  new window
41.Pai, Fan-Yun、Huang, Kai-I.(2011)。Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems。Technological Forecasting and Social Change,78(4),650-660。  new window
42.Davis, Fred D.、Bagozzi, Richard P.、Warshaw, Paul R.(1989)。User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models。Management Science,35(8),982-1003。  new window
43.Davis, Fred D.(1989)。Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, & User Acceptance of Information Technology。MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340。  new window
會議論文
1.劉忠峰、翁明正、吳欽和(201010)。以科技接受模式3探討網路大學系統使用意向之研究。第十四屆電子商務研討會。新北市:國立臺北大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Adams, R. D.、Martray, C.(1991)。Teacher development: A study of factors related to teacher concerns for pre, beginning, and experienced teachers。the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
3.Chang, I.(200203)。Assessing principals’ leadership in implementing educational technology policies。2002 Research and Creative Activities Forum (RCAF)。Columbia, MO。  new window
4.Marso, R. N.、Pigge, F. L.(199402)。Outstanding teachers’ concerns about teaching at four different stages of career development。the annual conference of the Association of Teacher Educators。Atlanta, GA.。  new window
5.Stegall, P.(1998)。The principal: Key to technology implementation。95th Annual Meeting of the National Catholic Education Association。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
學位論文
1.施宏杰(2010)。宜蘭縣國民中小學校長科技領導、教師資訊科技素養與教師教學效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Quin, D. M.(1999)。The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice(博士論文)。University of Missouri。  new window
3.劉亞平(1998)。教育改革的關心程度問卷與線上測驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ford, J. I.(2000)。Identifying Technology Leadership Competencies for Nebraska's K-12 Technology Leaders(博士論文)。University of Nebraska-Lincoln。  new window
5.紀清珍(2002)。國民小學校長校務關注及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.姜禮能(2002)。國小教師對於資訊融入教學之變革關注與相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
7.Inkster, C. D.(1998)。Technology leadership in elementary school principals: A comparative case study(博士論文)。University of Minnesota。  new window
8.邱慧玲(2002)。國民小學教師對九年一貫課程的關注階段與使用層次之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.王振鴻(2000)。國小教師對九年一貫課程之變革關注及其影響因素研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林煌凱(2002)。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
11.張盈霏(2006)。國民中學校長科技領導、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bridges, J. W.(2003)。Principal Influence: Sustaining a Vision for Powerful New Forms of Learning Using Technology(博士論文)。University of California。  new window
圖書
1.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari Knopp、黃光雄、李奉儒、高淑清、鄭瑞隆、林麗菊、吳芝儀、蔡清田、洪志成(2001)。質性教育研究:理論與方法。濤石文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anderson, R. E.、Dexter, S. L.(2000)。School technology leadership: Incidence and impact (Report No. 6)。Irvine, CA:Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations。  new window
3.Bellamy, G. T.、Fulmer, C. L.、Murphy, M. J.、Muth, R.(2006)。Principal accomplishments: How school leaders succeed。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
4.Collis, B.(1988)。Computers, curriculum, and whole-class instruction。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
5.Hall, G. E.、George, A. A.、Rutherford, W. L.(1977)。Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire。Austin, Texas:Southwest Educational Development Laboratory。  new window
6.Creighton, T. B.(2003)。The principal as technology leader。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Bailey, G. D.、Lumley, D.(1994)。Technology staff development programs: A leadership sourcebook for school administrators。New York:Scholastic。  new window
8.Ross, TRoss, T. W.、Bailey, G. D.(1996)。Technology-based learning: A handbook for teachers and technology leaders。Arlington Heights, IL:IRI/Skylight。  new window
9.Glatthorn, A. A.(2000)。The Principal as Curriculum Leader: Shaping What Is Taught and Tested。Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press。  new window
10.Fishbein, M.、Ajzen, I.(1980)。Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research。Addison-Wesley。  new window
11.Fullan, M. G.、Stiegelbauer, S.(1991)。The new meaning of educational change。New York。  new window
12.Bailey, G. D.、Lumley, D.、Dunbar, D.(1995)。Leadership & technology: What school board members need to know。Alexandria, VA:National School Board Association。  new window
13.吳清山(2007)。教育行政議題研究。臺北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.張奕華(2010)。學校科技領導與管理:理論及實務。台北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Brooks-Young, S.(2006)。Critical technology issues for school leaders。Corwin。  new window
16.Sergiovanni, T. J.(1992)。Moral leadership: getting to the heart of school improvement。New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.。  new window
17.Rich, J. M.(1992)。Innovations in education: Reformers and their critics。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
18.Hall, G. E.、Hord, S. M.(1987)。Change in schools: Facilitating the process。State University of New York Press。  new window
19.林明地(2002)。校長學:工作分析與角色研究取向。五南。  延伸查詢new window
20.Rogers, Everett M.(2003)。Diffusion of innovations。Free Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Hall, G. E.,Wallance, R. C.,Dossett, W. F.(1973)。A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions,Austin, TX:Research and Development Center for Teacher Education。(ED 095126)。  new window
其他
1.馮丁樹(1995)。實用學術論文寫作,http://www.bime.ntu.edu.tw/~dsfon/specialtopics/writethesis2.htm., 2012/09/17。  new window
2.臺北市政府教育局(2010)。資訊教育白皮書,http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=33696&CtUnit=19270&BaseDSD=56&mp=104001, 2011/11/19。  new window
3.International Society for Technology in Education(2011)。NET for administrators,http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-administrators.aspx., 2011/11/25。  new window
4.Loucks-Horsley, S.(2005)。The concern-based adoption model (CBAM): A model for change in individuals,http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/backg4a.htm., 2006/08/21。  new window
5.Maryland Association of Secondary School Principals(2011)。The evaluation of Minnesota’s school principals,http://www.md-massp.org/docs/Prin%20Eval%20Minnesota.pdf., 2011/12/17。  new window
6.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。Improving school leadership,http://www.oecd.org/edu/schoolleadership., 2011/12/17。  new window
7.教育部(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書,http://Orz.tw/7HmKg., 2009/10/07。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ajzen, I.(1985)。From intentions to actins: A theory of planned behavior。Action-control: From cognition to behavior。Springer-Verlag。  new window
2.Kearsley, G.、Lynch, W.(1994)。Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills。Educational technology: Leadership perspectives。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications。  new window
3.Van Der Leeuw, S. E.、Torrence, R.(1989)。Introduction: What’s new about Innovation?。What’s new? A closer look at the process of innovation。Boston, MA:Unwin Hyman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE