On Two Types of Existential Subjects in Chinese A-not-A Questions__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	On Two Types of Existential Subjects in Chinese A-not-A Questions
書刊名：	語言暨語言學
作者：	黃瑞恆
作者(外文)：	Huang, Ray Rui-heng
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	13:6
頁次：	頁1171-1210
主題關鍵詞：	正反問句；統制；存在性；干涉效應；極項；A-not-A question；C-command；Existential；Intervention effect；Polarity
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:30 點閱:72

本文探討兩種存在性主語為何皆無法在漢語正反問句當中出現的原因，其中一種是極項 wh 主語，另一種則是「有」字名詞主語。關於前者，文獻上有兩種不一樣的句法分析，本文比較之後指出，定指分析 (Cheng 1991,1994) 僅解釋部分語言事實，而沒有解釋為何正反問句裡的 wh 主語加上「有」字之後，已被量化，符合定指條件，但句子依舊不合法。相對的，這個問題並不存在於統制分析 (C.-T. Huang 1982, Li 1992, Lin 1998, R.-H. Huang 2009)。至於「有」字名詞組為何無法成為正反問句的主語，本文反駁語用分析 (Lin 1998)，改從句法角度切入，認為這個問題跟干涉效應有關，而跟主語指認無關。綜言之，上述兩種存在性主語不被漢語正反問句所接受的原因，跟正反運符的兩個句法特性有密切關係，分別是層級位置低於主語以及邏輯形式移位。

以文找文

This paper examines why an existential polarity wh-subject or a you-NP subject is not allowed in Chinese A-not-A questions. Two kinds of syntactic approaches proposed in the literature that deal with unacceptable existential polarity wh-subjects in A-not-A questions are reviewed. The definiteness approach (Cheng 1991, 1994) only partially explains relevant facts but raises a question which does not arise under the c-command approach (C.-T. Huang 1982, Li 1992, Lin 1998, R.-H. Huang 2009): Why are A-not-A sentences which involve an existentially quantified youwh- subject without violating the definiteness constraint on Chinese NP subjects still ungrammatical? As for why A-not-A questions cannot involve a you-NP subject, this paper proposes a syntactic solution based on feature intervention effects, while arguing against a pragmatic solution based on subject identity (Lin 1998). It is concluded that the unacceptability of existential polarity wh-subjects and you-NP subjects in Chinese A-not-A questions is closely tied to two syntactic properties of the A-not-A operator: the lower-than-the-subject position and LF movement, respectively.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Beck, Sigrid、Kim, Shin-Sook(2006)。Intervention effects in alternative questions。The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics，9(3)，165-208。
2.	Carlson, Gregory N.(1980)。Polarity any is existential。Linguistic Inquiry，11(4)，799-804。
3.	Guerzoni, Elena(2006)。Intervention effects on NPIs and feature movement: towards a unified account of intervention。Natural Language Semantics，14(4)，359-398。
4.	Huang, C. -T. James(1988)。Shuo ‘shi’ he ‘you’。Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica，59(1)，43-64。
5.	Huang, Shuanfan(1981)。On the scope of phenomena of Chinese quantifiers。Journal of Chinese Linguistics，9(2)，226-243。
6.	Kadmon, Nirit、Landman, Fred(1993)。Any。Linguistics and Philosophy，16(4)，353-422。
7.	Lin, Jo-wang(2004)。Choice functions and scope of existential polarity wh-phrases in Mandarin Chinese。Linguistics and Philosophy，27(4)，451-491。
8.	López, Luis(2001)。Head of a projection。Linguistic Inquiry，32(3)，521-532。
9.	Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2004)。Tan ‘you ren’, ‘you-de ren’, he ‘you-xie ren’。Hanyu Xuebao，2004(2)，16-25。
10.	Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2010)。Tan Hanyu motaici de fenbu yu quanshi zhi duiying guanxi。Zhongguo Yuwen，2010(3)，208-221。
11.	Yang, Barry Chung-Yu(2006)。On wh-nominal/adverb interaction and the left periphery。Nanzan Linguistics, Special Issue，1(1)，165-186。
12.	Yang, Barry Chung-Yu(2012)。Intervention effects and wh-construals。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，21(1)，43-87。
13.	Cole, Peter、Hermon, Gabriella、Sung, Li-May(1993)。Feature Percolation。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，2(1)，91-118。
14.	Lin, Jo-wang(1998)。On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，7(3)，219-255。
15.	蔡維天(19970300)。On the Absence of Island Effects。清華學報，27(1)，125-149。
16.	Fukui, N.、Speas, M.(1986)。Specifiers and Projection。MIT Working Papers in Linguistics，8，128-172。
17.	Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2008)。Left Periphery and How-Why Alternations。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，17(2)，83-115。
18.	Beck, Sigrid、Kim, Shin-Sook(1997)。On wh- and operator scope in Korean。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，6(4)，339-384。
19.	林若望(1992)。The Syntax of zenmeyang 'how' and weishen-me 'why' in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，1(3)，293-331。
20.	蔡維天(1999)。On Lexical Courtesy。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，8(1)，39-73。
21.	蔡維天(2001)。On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，10(2)，129-168。
22.	Beck, Sigrid(1996)。Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement。Natural Language Semantics，4(1)，1-56。
23.	Chomsky, Noam(1989)。Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation。MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL)，10，43-74。
24.	Cheng, Lisa L.-S.、Huang, C.-T. James(1996)。Two types of donkey sentences。Natural Language Semantics，4(2)，121-163。
25.	Li, Y.-H. Audrey(1992)。Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of East Asian Linguistics，1(2)，125-155。

會議論文
1.	Huang, Rui-heng Ray(2009)。Resolving a subject-object asymmetry with respect to existential polarity wh-phrases。NACCL。Smithfield, Rhode Island：Bryant University。508-523。
2.	Carlson, Gregory Norman(1981)。Distribution of free Choice Any。Chicago：Chicago Linguistic Society。17，8-23。
3.	Kuroda, Shige-Yuki(1988)。Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese。Stanford：CSLI。103-143+315-357。

學位論文
1.	Han, Chung-hye(1998)。The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar(碩士論文)。University of Pennsylvania，Philadelphia。
2.	蕭素英(2002)。Negative Sensitivity in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Mandarin Chinese and Holo Taiwanese(博士論文)。國立清華大學。延伸查詢
3.	Diesing, M.(1990)。The Syntactic Roots of Semantic Partition，Amherst。
4.	林若望(1996)。Polarity Licensing and Wh-phrase Quantification in Chinese(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts Amherst。
5.	黃正德(1982)。Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。
6.	Heim, Irene Roswitha(1982)。The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts Amherst。
7.	Zhang, Niina Ning(1997)。Syntactic Dependencies in Mandarin Chinese(博士論文)。University of Toronto。
8.	Nishigauchi, Taisuke(1986)。Quantification in Syntax(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts，Amherst。
9.	楊中玉(2008)。Intervention Effects and the Covert Component of Grammar(博士論文)。國立清華大學。延伸查詢
10.	鄭禮珊(1991)。On the Typology of Wh-questions(碩士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology，Cambridge。
11.	Lee, Thomas H. -T.(1986)。Studies on quantification in Chinese(-)。University of California，Los Angeles, CA。
12.	Kitagawa, Yoshihisa(1986)。Subjects in Japanese and English(-)。University of Massachusetts，Amherst。
13.	Starke, Michal(2001)。Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality(博士論文)。University of Geneva，Geneva。
14.	Progovac, Ljiljana(1988)。A Binding Approach to Polarity Sensitivity(博士論文)。University of Southern California，Los Angeles。

圖書
1.	Cheng, Lisa L. -S.(1994)。Wh-words as polarity items。Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 2: Historical Linguistics。Taipei：Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica。
2.	Ladusaw, William Allen(1980)。Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations。Garland Publishing Company。
3.	Huang, Cheng-Teh James(1998)。Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar。Garland Publishing, Inc.。
4.	Rizzi, Luigi(1990)。Relativized Minimality。MIT Press。
5.	Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures。Foris Publications。
6.	Chomsky, Noam(1995)。The minimalist program。MIT Press。
7.	湯廷池(1989)。漢語詞法句法續集。學生書局。延伸查詢
8.	Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(1999)。On Economizing the Theory of A-bar Dependencies。New York：Garland。
9.	Huang, Cheng-Teh James、Li, Audrey Yen-Hui、Li, Yafei(2009)。The Syntax of Chinese。Cambridge University Press。
10.	Diesing, M.(1992)。Indefinites。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
11.	Yang, Barry Chung-Yu(2007)。Intervention effect, wh-movement, and focus。UST Working Papers in Linguistics。Hsinchu：National Tsing Hua University。
12.	Roberts, Ian G.(2007)。Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms。Oxford：New York：Oxford University Press：Oxford University Press。
13.	Huang, C. T.(1991)。Modularity and Chinese A-not-A questions。Interdisciplinary Approaches to Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Yuki Kuroda。Boston：Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers：Kluwer Academic Publishers。
14.	Rizzi, Luigi(1997)。The fine structure of the left periphery。Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。

圖書論文
1.	黃正德、湯志真、鄭禮珊(1996)。Negative particle questions: A dialectal comparison。Microparametric syntax and dialect variation。John Benjamins Publishing Company。
2.	Klima, Edward S.(1964)。Negation in English。The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
3.	Rizzi, Luigi(2004)。Locality and Left Periphery。Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures。Oxford University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	Taxonomy of Questions in Taiwan Southern Min
2.	Two Types of Peripheral Adjunct Whats
3.	Processing of the Mandarin Polarity Item Renhe 'Any'
4.	The Intervention Effect in Late Archaic Chinese and Modern Mandarin
5.	A Very Long-distance Dependency: On the Evaluative Verb Reduplicative Construction
6.	Deriving Chinese Alternative Questions: Feature Percolation and LF Movement
7.	臺語基本否定詞「毋」、「無」的選用原理及教學
8.	A Comparative Study of How and Why in Taiwan Southern Min and Mandarin Chinese
9.	臺語句首言談標記「啊」
10.	Taiwanese Sī "Be" as a Common Ground Marker
11.	On Some Mysteries, Asymmetries and Derivation of Potential de Construction in Chinese
12.	Investigating the Argument Structure of Hakka Disposal Constructions: A Case Study of Disposal-Affective Jiong in Sixian Hakka
13.	The Syntax and Semantics of Prenominals: Construction or Composition?
14.	The Syntax of Bi-Comparatives in Mandarin Chinese
15.	Parallelism in Amis Sluicing

1.	漢語驚嘆句—句法與語義介面
2.	海圖新繪：從句法—語用介面看台灣閩南語的製圖分析
3.	客語輕動詞邊緣地貌圖
4.	漢語複雜疑問詞研究：以運符約束為本之分析
5.	比較句刪略：國台語對比研究
6.	析取、並列、與疑問：一個比較性的研究
7.	關係子句於英語為第二語言之即時處理研究
8.	鄒語語法結構與主語問題探究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	閩南語趨向式歷時演變探索
2.	Father, Teacher, Criminal: Historical and Generic Reading of William Wordsworth's Two-Part Prelude
3.	Musik als Berufung--E. T. A. Hoffmanns Komponistenkarriere und sein Versagen
4.	Dream on Classical and Modern Works: Life Is a Dream of Calderón de la Barca & Open Your Eyes of Alejandro Amenábar
5.	La Composición Morfológica del Chino Mandarín y el Español
6.	｢大目乾連冥間救母変文并図一卷并序｣における表現形式について
7.	A Cognitive Analysis of Puns in Spanish Advertising
8.	Rethinking OCP Effects on Tone Sandhi
9.	Prominence from Complexity: Capturing Tianjin Ditonal Patterns
10.	Circular Tonal Chain Shifts in Jiaoxian Compound Words
11.	Chengdu Reduplication: An Optimality Theoretic Analysis
12.	Phonemes, Features, and Syllables: Converting Onset and Rime Inventories to Consonants and Vowels
13.	Markedness and Lexical Typicality in Mandarin Acceptability Judgments
14.	OT Factorial Typology and the Typology of Mandarin Mid Vowel Assimilation

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫