臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：幼兒園中受忽視與受爭議幼兒的社會能力探討
書刊名：人類發展與家庭學報
作者：陳怡君／鍾志從 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Yi-chun／Jong, Jyh-tsorng
出版日期：2012
卷期：14
頁次：頁26-52
主題關鍵詞：受忽視幼兒；受爭議幼兒；社會能力；Controversial children；Neglected children；Social competence
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:194
  • 點閱點閱:107
本研究旨在探討幼兒園中受忽視幼兒與受爭議幼兒的社會能力現況與相關影響因素。以臺北市五所公立幼兒園十二個大班，328名幼兒進行照片式社會計量法，選出受忽視幼兒70名及受爭議幼兒52名後進行社會能力評量。主要研究結果如下：一、受忽視幼兒的整體社會能力屬於中等；以「合群合作」能力最佳，最少出現的是「互動行為」。二、受爭議幼兒的整體社會能力也屬中上程度；其「合群合作」能力最佳，最少出現的是「利他行為」。三、受忽視幼兒的「合群合作」能力高於受爭議幼兒；受爭議幼兒的「互動行為」表現高於受忽視幼兒。四、不同性別、排行與家庭社經地位的受忽視幼兒，在「利他行為」方面，女生的能力高於男生；排行獨子的受忽視幼兒，女生的「合群合作」表現優於男生；低社經家庭的受忽視幼兒，女生的「禮貌」表現比男生好；受忽視的男生中，高社經家庭幼兒的「禮貌」表現優於低社經家庭的幼兒。五、受爭議幼兒的各項社會能力，女生的能力均比男生高；高社經又排行老二的受爭議幼兒，他們的「禮貌」表現優於低社經又排行老二的受爭議幼兒。
The purposes of this study were to discuss the current status of social competences of neglected children and controversial children in kindergarten, and to explore the differences in social competences of neglected children and controversial children among their gender, birth order, and family's social and economic status. Results were listed as follows:1. Neglected children scored highest in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences but lowest in ”interactive behavior” competence.2. Controversial children scored highest in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences but lowest in ”altruist behavior” competence.3. Neglected children were higher than controversial children in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences, but lower in ”interactive behavior” competence.4. Differences in social competences of neglected children among gender, birth order, family's social and economic status: (1) Neglected girls were higher in ”altruist behavior” competence than neglected boys. (2) For neglected children, girls were better in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences than boys. (3) For neglected children in low social and economic status, girls were higher in ”manners” than boys. (4) For neglected children, boys from high social and economic status were higher in ”manners” than those from low social and economic status.5. Differences in social competences of controversial children among gender, birth order, family's social and economic status: (1) In general, controversial girls' social competences of ”altruist behavior”, ”gregariousness and cooperation”, ”interactive behavior”, ”manners”, and ”independence and autonomy” higher than boys. (2) Birth order and social and economic status had the interactive effects only in the social competence of ”manners”. Second-born controversial children from families with high social and economic status were higher than those from families with low social and economic status.
期刊論文
1.李駱遜(2003)。他們還被忽視嗎？「教室中隱形人」的後續研究。幼兒教育年刊，15，14-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葉連祺、蔡錦美(199706)。比較不同社會計量測量準據的友伴選擇結構。國立編譯館館刊，26(1)，323-354。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡淑苓(2003)。幼兒同儕關係之研究--以幼稚園大班幼兒社會計量爲例。臺南女子技術學院學報，22，117-148。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ackerman, B. P.、Brown, E. D.、Izard, C. E.(2004)。The relation between contextual risk, earned income, and the school adjustment of children from economically disadvantaged families40，204-215。  new window
5.Anderson, S.、Messick, S.(1974)。Social competency in young children。Development Psychology，10，282-293。  new window
6.Bagwell, C. L.、Newcomb, A. F.、Bukowski, W. M.(1998)。Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment。Child Development，69(1)，140-153。  new window
7.Bemdt’T. J.、Bulleit, T. N.(1985)。Effect of sibillng relationships on preschoolers’ behavior at home and at school。Development Psychology，21，761-767。  new window
8.Chen, X.、U, D.、Li, Z. Y.、Li, B. S.、Liu, M.(2000)。Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in Chinese children： Common and unique contributions to social, academic, and psychological adjustment。Developmental Psychology，36，302-314。  new window
9.Coie, J. D.、Dodge, K. A.(1988)。Multople sources of date on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison。Child Development，59，815-829。  new window
10.Hart, C. H.、Draper, T. W.、Olsen, J. A.(2001)。Peer and teacher sociometrics for preschool children： Cross-informant concordance, temporal stability, and reliability。Merrill - Palmer Quarterly，47，416-443。  new window
11.Howe, N.、Ross, H.(1990)。Socialization, perspective-taking, and the sibling relationship。Developmental Psychology，26，160-165。  new window
12.Hubbard, J. A. ; Coie, J. A.(1994)。Emotional determinants of social competence in children's peer relationships。Merrill-Palmer Quarterly，40，1-21。  new window
13.Keane, S. E.、Calkins, S. D.(2004)。Predicting kindergarten peer social status from toddler and preschool problem behavior。Journal Abnormal Child Psychology，32，409-423。  new window
14.Ladd, G. W.、Kochenderfer, B. J.(1998)。Parenting behaviors and the parent-child relationship: Correlates of peer victimization in kindergarten?。Developmental Psychology，34，1450-1458。  new window
15.Lavallee, K. L. ; Bierman ; K. L. ; Nix, R. L.(2005)。The impact of first-grade “friendship group" experiences on child social outcomes in the fast track program。Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology，33，307-324。  new window
16.Ma, I.(2006)。Temperament and peer relationships。Childhood Education，83，38-43。  new window
17.McFall, R. M.(1982)。A reformulation of the concept of social skill。Behavioral Assessment，4，1-33。  new window
18.Miller, N.、Maruyama, G.(1976)。Ordinal position and peer popularity。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，33，123-131。  new window
19.Perr, J. C.(1979)。Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected： A reconceptualiziation of sociometric status in preschool children50，1231-1234。  new window
20.Rice, M. L.、Hadley P A.、Alexander, A.(1993)。Social biases toward children with specific language impairment： A correlative causal model of language limitations。Applied Psycholinguistics，14，445-471。  new window
21.Schoon, I.、Bunner J.、Joshi H.、Parsons S.、Wiggins, R. D.、Sacker, A.(2002)。The influence of context, timing, and duration of risk experience for the passage from childhood to midadulthood。Child Development，73，1486-1504。  new window
22.Wentzel, K. R.(2003)。Motivating students to behavior in socially competent ways。Theory into Practice，42，319-326。  new window
23.Wohlwend, K. E.(2004)。Chasing friendship： Acceptance, rejection, and recess play。Childhood Education，81，77-82。  new window
24.李駱遜(20020900)。「教室中的隱形人」--被忽略幼兒的研究。幼兒教育年刊，14，91-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Ladd, G. W.、Profilet, S. M.(1996)。The child behavior scale: A teacher-report measure of young children's aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors。Developmental Psychology，32(6)，1008-1024。  new window
26.Dodge, Kenneth A.(1983)。Behavioral antecedents of peer social status。Child Development，54(6)，1386-1399。  new window
27.Parker, J.G.、Asher, S.R.(1987)。Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-acceptd children at risk?。Psychological Bulletin，102(3)，357-389。  new window
28.黃德祥(19910100)。社會計量地位分類之研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，38，53-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估：社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊，49(4)，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Rose-Krasnor, Linda(1997)。The Nature of Social Competence: a Theoretical Review。Social Development，6(1)，111-135。  new window
31.Denham, S. A.、Blair, K. A.、DeMulder, E.、Levitas, J.、Sawyer, K.、Auerbach-Major, S.(2003)。Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence?。Child Development，74，238-256。  new window
32.Hartup, W. W.、Charlesworth, R.、Glazer, J. A.(1967)。Peer reinforcement and sociometric status。Child Development，38，1017-1024。  new window
33.Waters, E.、Sroufe, L. A.(1983)。Social competence as a developmental construct。Developmental Review，3，79-97。  new window
34.Newcomb, A. F.、Bukowski, W. M.、Pattee, L.(1993)。Children's Peer Relations: A Meta-analytic Review of Popular, Rejected, Neglected, Controversial, and Average Sociometric Status。Psychological Bulletin，113(1)，99-128。  new window
35.Berndt, T. J.(2002)。Friendship Quality and Social Development。Current Directions In Psychological Science，11，7-11。  new window
36.Wentzel, K. R.、Asher, S. R.(1995)。The Academic Lives of Neglected, Rejected, Popular, and Controversial Children。Child Development，66，754-763。  new window
37.Coie, J. D.、Dodge, K. A.、Copottelli, H.(1982)。Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective。Developmental Psychology，18(4)，557-570。  new window
38.Duncan, G. J.、Brooks-Gunn, J.(2000)。Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development。Child Development，71(1)，188-196。  new window
會議論文
1.吳宗浩、鍾志從(20120518)。父母的社交技巧與幼兒氣質、同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會：家人關係--理論與實際的對話，(會議日期: 2012/05/18)。台北：輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱美嬡、鍾志從(2012)。幼兒的性別知覺與其同儕關係的關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會 : 家人關係--理論與實際的對話，(會議日期: 2012/05/18)。臺北：輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯華葳(1983)。中國兒童社會行爲研究。臺灣省國民教育學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
4.連士慧、鍾志從(20120518)。幼兒自尊與同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會。台北：輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張瓊文、鍾志從(20120518)。幼兒人際知覺與同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會，(會議日期: 2012/05/18)。台北：輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳若琳(1999)。臺灣幼兒社會能力量表之編製 (計畫編號：NSCH88-2413-H-030-181)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.潘秀雯(2006)。幼兒人際衝突中的角色取替能力與其社會計量地位的關聯(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣惠珍。學前兒童友伴關係的相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rubin, K. H.、Bukowski W.、Parker, J. C.(1998)。Peer interaction, relationships, and groups(-)，New York。  new window
4.梁瑪莉(1987)。學前兒童社會能力之家庭相關因素硏究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sarason, B. R.(1981)。The dimensions of social competence： Contributions from a variety of research areas。Social competence。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳武典(1978)。社會計量法。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：648（臺灣：647，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67704663
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上