本研究比較不同等級選手在下肢爆發力、速度與敏捷性、心肺耐力與無氧動力之間的差異並分析各項能力間的相關性，期能發現符合籃球比賽特性的測驗方式以作為平時體能管理與鑑別選手優劣的方式。方法：本研究受試者為42位超級籃球聯賽級與大專各級男性籃球選手（SBL = 8位，UBA1 = 14位，UBA2 = 12位，UBA3 = 8位），分別進行跨步擺臂垂直跳（counter movement jump, CMJ）、不擺臂蹲跳（squat jump, SJ）、20公尺衝刺、505敏捷性測驗、20公尺多階段折返跑以及5 × 6秒間歇無氧動力等6項體能測驗，所得結果以單因子變異數分析比較不同等級選手間運動表現的差異，以皮爾森相關係數分析各項指標之間的關係，顯著水準為p

The purpose of this study was to compare the physiological condition and measure the correlation of different physiological index among basketball players in different levels, in order to establish the physiological test protocol for basketball game. And expect the protocol can be used to monitor the player's condition and to distinction the player's ability. Methods: The subject was 42 male basketball players from 4 levels including super basketball league (SBL) and varsities players (SBL = 8; varsities: UBA1 = 14, UBA2 = 12, UBA3 = 8). Use the counter movement jump and squat jump to measure the explosive power of the lower limbs. The speed and agility was separately measured by 20-meter sprint and 505 agility test. The aerobic capacity was measured by a 20-m multistage shuttle run test. The anaerobic power was measured by a 5 × 6-second repeat-effort test. The statistical difference among different level was assessed by one-way ANOVA and Scheffé's post hoc tests, and the relationship of different physiological index were tested by applying Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: (1) Performance: The SBL player were significantly quick than other level's player in the preferred foot of 505-agility test; In VO2max the UBA3 player was significantly lower than other level's player; It was significant better performance for SBL's anaerobic power; (2) Correlation: The speed had significant correlation with the agility test-dominant foot. The peak power, average power, and total work of 5 × 6-second repeat-effort test had a significant correlated with VO2max. Last. The peak power and total work had significant correlation with Power of CMJ, and the power decrease percentage was significantly correlation with power of SJ. Conclusion: The SBL level player was perform significantly better than other levels in 505 agility test (preferred foot) and 5 × 6-second repeat-effort test. Therefore we suggested those test is applicable to be major test in basketball fitness test. On the other hand the 20-m multistage shuttle run test was reliable test, it has convenient for test and to get test result rapidly, hence this test can be employment to measure the fitness conditioning in each level basketball player.