:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業併購與勞動關係存續保障的抉擇--以我國勞動基準法及企業併購法之相關規定為檢討對象
書刊名:東吳法律學報
作者:吳姿慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Tzu-hui
出版日期:2013
卷期:24:4
頁次:頁99-137
主題關鍵詞:企業併購勞動關係存續保障事業單位改組轉讓商定留用概括承受契約承擔解僱保護契約正義Mergers and acquisitionsProtection of workers to the existence of institutionsReorganizationTransferAgreed to remain in employment broadly accept the contract bearDismissal protectionContract justice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:49
在國際化、自由化以及全球化之趨勢下,企業為增進生產效率以及提高競爭能力,除致力技術升級,亦經常以裁撤或整併相關部門調整組織結構降低勞動成本作為因應措施,然而產業結構一旦調整,尤其是事業單位改組、轉讓或讓與營業及財產時,勞雇關係通常即受影響:原來受雇之勞工如受留用,係指原勞動契約之延續還是僅個人受僱機會受到保障,影響所及,勞工之年資、薪資、退休金、職工福利金等應維持或改變;另一方面,不受留用或拒絕留用者應如何維護相關權益,均為勞動法學關心之問題,學說也有相當多之論述。依我國現行勞基法之規定事業單位之轉讓為雇主得終止勞動契約之法定事由;企業併購法亦規定公司併購時勞工由新舊雇主商定留用,這些法規確立了新舊雇主商定留用原則,從企業併購觀點或許視之為簡易且符合效率之規範,但與外國立法例相較,例如德國民法第613a條規定廠場轉讓勞動關係必須隨同移轉,在企業併購與勞動關係存續保障之間,是否是一個妥適之價值抉擇,恐有疑義。企業轉讓,勞工處於被動接受新舊雇主決定去留之結果,這種「資產概括承受、勞工商定留用」之政策,呈現的或許是經營效率財產之極大化,但卻已喪失傳統法律追求公平正義之規範價值,尤其是企業之利潤並非完全由企業之營業及財產設備創造而來,勞動力更應是運用企業設備或組織環境共創企業利潤之重要要素,如認為僱用機會係由經營組織衍生,僱傭關係之存續或終止僅由雇主控制或決定,將完全忽視勞動力對於生產組織發揮功能之一體性,且忽視商定留用影響勞動契約之存續,涉及勞工生存權之問題。故本文以為企業併購時,消滅公司之權利義務既由吸收或新設合併公司概括承受,消滅公司之勞工亦應由其承受,將現行勞基法及企併法商定留用原則,改為勞動契約法定承擔原則。至於分割及收購營業或財產之併購型態,因實務對於「獨立營運」、一部或全部「營業及財產」之概念認定標準仍然分歧,是否同採承受勞工,則持保留態度。
The trend of internationalization, liberalization and globalization, businesses increase productivity and improve competitiveness, in addition to efforts to upgrade its technology, often eliminating or whole and the relevant departments to adjust the organizational structure to reduce labor costs as a workaround, however, the industrial structure Once adjusted, especially the restructuring of the institutions, assign or transfer with the business and property, the relationship of employer and employee usually that is, affected: the original employment of workers affected by retained, means a continuation of the original labor contract or only individual of employment opportunities are protected Consequently, the labor of years, salaries, pensions, employee benefits, etc. should be maintained or change; the other hand, are not retained or reject those retained should be how to maintain the relevant rights and interests, are concerned about Labor Law, the doctrine also quite a lot of the discourse. Statu tory subject matter of the transfer of institutions in accordance with the provisions of the current Labor Standards Act for the employer terminates a labor contract; Merger and Acquisition Act also provides for mergers and acquisitions, labor by the old and the new employer agreed retained, these regulations establish the old and the new employer agreed that the retained principle for mergers and acquisitions or the case of simple and in accordance with the norms of efficiency, but compared to cases with foreign legislation, such as plant transfer of labor relations of the provisions of section 613a of the German Civil Code must be accompanied by the transfer, mergers and acquisitions and workers subsisting between security, whether it is a properly the value of choice, fear of doubt. Transfer, labor in the passive acceptance of the results of old and new employers decided the fate of this ”asset broadly accept, workers agreed to remain in employment” policy, perhaps showing the maximization of operating efficiency of property, but has lost the traditional legal pursuit of fairness and justice the normative value, especially in the profits of the enterprise is not entirely come from the business and property and equipment to create more labor should be the use of business equipment or organizational environment to create an important element of corporate profits, such as employment opportunities derived by the business organization, subsisting or termination of employment opportunities, only the employer's control or decision will be completely ignored labor for the production organization to play a functional unity, and ignore the agreed retained affect the labor contract subsisting, the problems relating to labor the right to life. We argue that to destroy the rights and obligatio ns of the company mergers and acquisitions, both by the absorption or the new combined company generally take the elimination of the labor of the Company should also be by to bear the existing Labor Standards Law and enterprises, and France agreed to the retained principle instead of the labor contract legal commitment to principle. As for the type of segmentation and the acquisition of the business or property acquisition standards are still differences, due to the concept of Practice for the ”independent operation”, one or all of the ”business and property” is to bear with the mining labor, there are still room for discussion.
期刊論文
1.王惠玲(19971200)。事業單位改組轉讓問題之探討。律師雜誌,219,43-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃國昌(2005)。併購風潮下勞工權益保障之問題點。臺灣本土法學雜誌,77,202-207。  延伸查詢new window
3.王能君(20040600)。日本「解僱權濫用法理」與「整理解僱法理」。臺灣勞動法學會學報,3,43-67。  延伸查詢new window
4.李弘仁(19920100)。勞動契約之移轉--勞基法第二十條之檢討。勞工行政,45,44-47。  延伸查詢new window
5.杜怡靜(20020200)。企業組織再造與公司分割制度--以日本公司分割制度之研究為中心。月旦法學,81,137-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林佳和(2008)。預算刪減、業務緊縮與不定期契約--台南高分院九七勞上易九。台灣法學雜誌,118,181-182。  延伸查詢new window
7.林佳和(20090601)。關係企業間的工作安置義務?最後手段原則的進一步發展/最高法院判決九八臺上六五二。臺灣法學雜誌,129,209-211。  延伸查詢new window
8.林更盛(20031200)。「控制性持股」關係對雇主概念及其責任的可能影響。律師雜誌,291,30-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.林更盛(20000200)。評臺北地院八六年度勞訴字第五四號判決--解雇之最後手段性原則。律師雜誌,245,98-104。  延伸查詢new window
10.林更盛(19990400)。承攬關係中職業災害案例評釋。法學叢刊,44(2)=174,165-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林更盛(20010700)。論勞動法上的一般平等待遇原則--評臺灣臺北地方法院八七年勞簡上字第一六號判決。中原財經法學,6,307-325。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.邱駿彥(20051200)。勞動契約終止及預告之法律問題探討。華岡法粹,34,119-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.邱駿彥(20060600)。勞工退休金條例釋義--以個人帳戶制為中心。臺灣勞動法學會學報,5,137-174。  延伸查詢new window
14.郭玲惠(20031200)。金融控股公司與企業併購對於勞工勞動條件保障之初探--以調職為例。律師雜誌,291,16-29。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳榮圳(20070400)。論企業併購與勞動契約轉讓之關係--以員工留用權為核心。萬國法律,152,26-35。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳建文(20030600)。勞動基準法第二十條之研究。政大法學評論,74,291-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳建文(20031200)。控股公司所引發之勞動法議題初探。律師雜誌,291,61-91。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳春山、張馥羽(20020200)。我國公司併購過程中法律爭議。實用月刊,326,36-39。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃程貫(2009)。企業外調動--台北地院九七勞簡上三三。台灣法學雜誌,119,207-208。  延伸查詢new window
20.劉志鵬(2003)。控股公司、關係企業--勞動法之新課題。律師雜誌,291,6-7。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉志鵬(19960400)。談三井公司大量資遣員工事件。月旦法學,12,86-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.劉志鵬(20031200)。關係企業與勞工之職務異動--臺灣高等法院九十一年度勞上易字第五號判決評釋。律師雜誌,291,40-60。  延伸查詢new window
23.劉忠欽、朱瑞陽、幸大智(20020500)。企業併購與人力資源之處理。全國律師,6(5),39-54。  延伸查詢new window
24.謝清風(20070500)。競爭併購下勞動者保護之探討--以退休金為中心。全國律師,11(5),73-88。  延伸查詢new window
25.Buchner, Herbert(2002)。Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeiten einer Deregulierung des Kündigungsschutzrechts。NZA,533-536。  new window
26.Commandeur, Gert、Kleinebrink, Wolfgang(2012)。Läuft das Kündigungsverbot bei einem Betriebsübergang ins Leere?。BB,1857-1861。  new window
27.Delden, Martin Koller-van(2007)。Neue Leitlinien beim Betriebsübergang。DStR,1869-1874。  new window
28.Kittner, Oliver(2012)。Die Verwirkung des Widerspruchsrechts beim Betriebsübergang。NJW,1180-1185。  new window
29.Kreft, Burghard(2012)。Kontinuität und Wandel beim Bestandsschutz。NZA-Beil,58-66。  new window
30.Lipinski, Wolfgang(2002)。Reichweite der Kündigungskontrolle durch § BGB § 613a IV 1 BGB。NZA,75-81。  new window
31.Lingemann, Stefan(2012)。Richtig unterrichtet beim Betriebsübergang - neue Hilfestellungen des BAG。NZA,546-549。  new window
32.Meyer, Cord(2007)。Transformierende Betriebsvereinbarungen beim Betriebsübergang。NZA,1408-1410。  new window
33.Moll, Wilhelm(2003)。Betriebsübergang und Betriebsänderung。RdA,129-140。  new window
34.Preis, Ulrich(2003)。Reform des Bestandsschutzrechts im Arbeitsverhältnis。RdA,65-81。  new window
35.Simon, Stefan、Weninger, Heike(2010)。Betriebsübergang und Gesamtrechtsnachfolge: Kein Widerspruch - keine Unterrichtung?。BB,117-119。  new window
36.郭玲惠(20051200)。企業併購中勞工權益之保障--以個別勞動關係為核心。臺北大學法學論叢,57,45-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.王志誠(20040700)。優質企業併購法之建構:效率與公平之間。臺灣本土法學雜誌,60,75-100。  延伸查詢new window
38.黃程貫(20030900)。我國勞動法發展趨勢之觀察與展望。月旦法學,100,91-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.王志誠(20010400)。企業併購法制之基礎構造。國立中正大學法學集刊,4,91-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.王文宇(20020400)。企業併購法總評。月旦法學,83,70-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.楊通軒(20010700)。勞動者的概念與勞工法。中原財經法學,6,227-305。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.李禮仲(20020500)。企業併購法之探討。全國律師,6(5),4-21。  延伸查詢new window
43.劉連煜(2001)。讓與主要部分營業或財產之判斷標準。我國本土法學,29,114-121。  延伸查詢new window
44.詹文凱(2002)。企業併購對於勞動契約之影響。月旦法學,83,86-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.林炫秋(1999)。事業單位轉讓與勞動契約之變動。政大法學評論,62,255-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.葉秋英、吳志光(2003)。論企業併購法下收購類型之適用。月旦法學,94,226-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林更盛(2002)。以勞務給付專屬性之違反作為解僱事由。勞動法案例研究。翰蘆。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱駿彥(1999)。調職法理之探討。勞動法裁判選輯。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃馨慧(2005)。我國企業併購法適用之若干疑義。勞動基準法釋義--施行二十年之回顧與展望。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1987)。民事法律專題研究(7)。司法週刊雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂榮海(1987)。勞基法實用I。蔚理。  延伸查詢new window
6.張清滄(1993)。勞動基準法實用。復文。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭玉波、陳榮隆(2002)。民法債篇總論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Dieterich, Thomas、Hanau, Peter、Schaub, Günter(2012)。Erfurter Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht。  new window
9.Säcker, Franz Jürgen、Rixecker, Roland(2009)。Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch。zitiert:MünchKomm。  new window
10.Schaub, Günter(2011)。Arbeitsrechtshandbuch。München。  new window
11.v. Hoyningen-Huene, Gerrick、Linck, Rüdiger(2007)。KSchG。  new window
12.柯芳枝(2009)。公司法論。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
13.王澤鑑(2003)。債法原理--基本理論債之發生。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃程貫(2002)。勞動法。國立空中大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
15.林誠二(2010)。債法總論新解:體系化解說。瑞興圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.楊通軒(2010)。個別勞工法。台北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE