Policy Change or Policy Intractability in Post-Crisis Landscape? The Fukushima Explosion and Comparative Nuclear Energy Policy_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Policy Change or Policy Intractability in Post-Crisis Landscape? The Fukushima Explosion and Comparative Nuclear Energy Policy
書刊名：	行政暨政策學報
作者：	簡赫琳
作者(外文)：	Chien, Her-lin
出版日期：	2013
卷期：	56
頁次：	頁117-145
主題關鍵詞：	災變；政策變遷；政策學習；核能政策；敘事政策分析法；Crisis；Policy change；Policy learning；Nuclear energy policy；Narrative policy analysis；NPA
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:30

許多學者研究發現，災變是許多爭議性高之政策變遷的催化劑，但除此之外，災變究竟如何影響政策制訂方向還未被仔細檢驗，例如：不同國家之政策制定者面對相同的災變，其政策回應到底是相同還是不同？本研究使用敘事政策分析法（NPA）來比較多國在2011年福島核災後核能政策走向的相異，共有六國在本研究中被分析：美國、法國、印度、瑞士、台灣與義大利，前三國在災後並沒有顯著核能政策變遷，後三國則在災後經歷核能政策改變。此研究發現，災變並不總像過去研究發現的必為政策帶來變遷，許多政策縱使在經過災變後仍是停滯，政策學習也不一定是必然。

以文找文

Many scholars argue that a crisis can serve as a catalyst to prompt a previously controversial policy change. However, many of the effects of a crisis on policy changes or policy intractability remain uninvestigated. Do policy-makers in different countries react similarly or differently to the same crisis? This paper uses a narrative policy analysis to conduct comparative case studies to examine how the 2011 Fukushima nuclear explosion affected nuclear energy policies in different polities. Six cases are selected: the United States, France, India, Switzerland, Taiwan and Italy. Whereas the first three countries listed do not exhibit nuclear policy changes in the post-crisis landscape, the latter three have experienced a policy reversal. This research finds that crises do not always serve as a catalyst to induce policy changes as conventional wisdom predicts. Many policies exhibit its intractability even after a major crisis whereas policy learning is not automatic neither.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Baumgartner, F.(1989)。Independent and Politicized Policy Communities: Education and Nuclear Energy in France and in the United States。Governance，2(1)，42-66。
2.	Baumgartner, F.(2009)。Uncovering Deterministic Causal Structures: A Boolean Approach。Syntheses，170，71-96。
3.	Boin, Arjen、Paul 't Hart、Allan McConnell(2009)。Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests。Journal of European Public Policy，16，81-106。
4.	Burnett, M.、Davis, C.(2002)。Getting Out the Cut: Politics and National Forest Timber Harvests, 1960-1995。Administration and Society，34(2)，202-228。
5.	Curtis, S.、Gesler, W.、Smith, G.、Washburn, S.(2000)。Approaches to Sampling and Case Selection in Qualitative Research: Examples in the Geography of Health。Social Science & Medicine，50(7/8)，1001-1014。
6.	Glaser, B.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1965)。Discovery of Substantive Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitative Research。American Behavioral Scientist，8，5-12。
7.	Godwin, M. L.、Schroedel, J. R.(2000)。Policy Diffusion and Strategies for Promoting Policy Change: Evidence from California Local Gun Control Ordinances。Policy Studies Journal，28(4)，760-776。
8.	Gundel, Stephan(2005)。Towards a New Typology of Crisis。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis，13(3)，106-115。
9.	Hansen, K.、Krejci, D.(2000)。Rethinking Neoinstitutional Interaction: Municipal Arena-Specific Strategies and the Base Closure Process。Administration and Society，32(2)，166-182。
10.	Hoberg, G.(1996)。Putting Ideas in Their Place: A response to Learning and Change in the British Columbia Forest Policy Sector。Canadian Journal of Political Science，29，135-144。
11.	Kurtz, R. S.(2004)。Coastal Oil Pollution: Spills, Crisis, and Policy Change。Review of Policy Research，21(2)，201-219。
12.	Lertzman, Ken、Rayner, Jeremy、Wilson, Jeremy(1996)。Learning and Change in the British Columbia Forest Policy Sector: A Consideration of Sabatier's Advocacy Coalition Framework。Canadian Journal of Political Science，22，111-133。
13.	Levi, Michael、Wall, David S.(2004)。Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the Post-9/11 European Information Society。Journal of Law and Society，31(2)，197-220。
14.	Nohrstedt, Daniel(2008)。The Politics of Crisis Policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy。Policy Studies Journal，36(2)，257-278。
15.	Nohrstedt, Daniel、Weible, Christopher M.(2010)。The Logic of Policy Change after Crisis: Proximity and Subsystem Interaction。Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy，1(2)，1-32。
16.	Pralle, S. B.(2003)。Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy。Journal of Public Policy，23(3)，233-260。
17.	Radaelli, C.(1999)。Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions。Journal of Market Studies，37，661-682。
18.	Sabatier, P.(2000)。Clear Enough to Be Wrong。Journal of European Public Policy，7，134-40。
19.	Smith, D.(1974)。Social Construction of Documentary Reality。Sociological Inquiry，44(4)，257-268。
20.	't Hart, P.(1993)。Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimensions of Crisis Management。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management，1(1)，36-50。
21.	Walgrave, Stefaan、Varone, Frederic(2008)。Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda-Setting: Bringing Parties Back in: Policy Change after the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium。Governance，21(3)，365-395。
22.	Weible, Christopher M.(2008)。Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis。The Policy Studies Journal，36(4)，615-635。
23.	Wood, Robert S.(2006)。Tobacco’s Tipping Point: The Master Settlement Agreement as a Focusing Event。The Policy Studies Journal，34(3)，419-436。
24.	Mintrom, Michael、Vergari, Sandra(1996)。Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change。Policy Studies Journal，24(3)，420-434。
25.	Birkland, Thomas A.(1998)。Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting。Journal of Public Policy，18(1)，53-74。
26.	Hall, P. A.(1993)。Policy paradigms, and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain。Comparative Politics，25(3)，275-296。
27.	Bennett, Colin J.、Howlett, Michael(1992)。The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change。Policy Sciences，25(3)，275-294。
28.	Staw, Barry M.、Sandelands, Lance E.、Dutton, Jane E.(1981)。Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis。Administrative Science Quarterly，26(4)，501-524。
29.	McBeth, Mark K.、Shanahan, Elizabeth. A.、Arnell, Ruth J.、Hathway, Paul L.(2007)。The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory。The Policy Studies Journal，35(1)，87-108。
30.	James, T. E.、Jorgensen, P. D.(2009)。Policy Knowledge, Policy Formulation, and Change: Revisiting a Foundational Question。The Policy Studies Journal，37(1)，141-161。
31.	Walker, J. L.(1977)。Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection。British Journal of Political Science，7(4)，423-445。

圖書
1.	Corbin, T. B.(2010)。Policy Entrepreneurs and Focusing Events: Congressional Agenda Setting after Hurricane Katrina。Claremont：The Claremont Graduate University.。
2.	Glaser, B.(1992)。Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing。Chicago：Aldine。
3.	Light, P.(1982)。The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter (with Notes on Ronald Reagan)。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University。
4.	Miles, M.、Huberman, A.(1994)。Qualitative Dada Analysis。London：Sage。
5.	Nudell, M.、Anthokol, N.(1988)。The Handbook for Effective Emergency and Crisis Management。Toronto：Lexington。
6.	Pauchant, T. C.、Mitroff, I. I.(1992)。The Crisis-Prone Organization: Diagnostic and Intervention。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
7.	Raphael, B.(1986)。When Disaster Strikes: A Handbook for the Helping Professions。London：Hutchinson。
8.	Schneider, Anne L.、Ingram, Helen M.(2005)。Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy。State University of New York Press。
9.	't Hart, Paul、Boin, Arjen(2001)。Between Crisis and Nomalcy: The Long Shadow of Post- Crisis Politics。Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities。Springfield, IL：Charles C. Thomas。
10.	Baumgartner, Frank R.、Jones, Bryan D.(1993)。Agenda and Instability in American Politics。University of Chicago Press。
11.	Birkland, Thomas A.(2006)。Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change after Catastrophic Events。Washington, DC：Georgetown University Press。
12.	Gladwell, Malcolm(2000)。The Tipping Point。New York：Little, Brown and Company。
13.	Fischer, Frank、Forester, John(1993)。The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning。Durham, NC：London：Duke University Press：UCL Press Limited。
14.	Strauss, A.(1987)。Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist。Cambridge University Press。
15.	Ragin, Charles C.(2008)。Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond。University of Chicago Press。
16.	Cobb, Roger W.、Elder, Charles D.(1983)。Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building。Johns Hopkins University Press。
17.	Latour, Bruno(1999)。Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies。Harvard University Press。
18.	Sabatier, Paul A.、Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.(1993)。Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach。Westview Press。
19.	Stone, Deborah A.(2002)。Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making。W. W. Norton & Company。
20.	Ragin, Charles C.(2000)。Fuzzy-Set Social Science。University of Chicago Press。
21.	Kingdon, John Wells(1984)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Little, Brown and Company。
22.	Woodward, James(2003)。Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation。Oxford University Press。
23.	Ragin, Charles C.(1987)。The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies。University of California Press。
24.	Glaser, Barney G.(1978)。Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory。Sociology Press。
25.	Fink, Steven、Break J.(1986)。Crisis Management: Planning for the Inevitable。New York：American Management Association。
26.	Roe, Emery(1994)。Narrative Policy Analysis。Durham, NC：Duke University Press。

其他
1.	Daly, John(2013)。Fukushima 2.0 in the Making?，http://www.econmatters. com/201 l/01/fukushima-20-in-making.html， 2013/04/22。
2.	Geiser, Urs.(2013)。Fukushima Fallout Spreads to Swiss Politics，http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Specials/Elections_2011/Opinion_and_Background/ Fukushima_fallout_spreads_to_Swiss_politics.html?cid=29973340， 2013/04/22。
3.	International Atomic Energy Agency(2013)。Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050，Vienna, Austria。，http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/RDS1_31.pdf， 2013/04/22。

圖書論文
1.	Hajer, Maarten(1993)。Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain。The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning。Duke University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	運用Sabatier整合取向觀點分析幼兒就學補助政策
2.	中國環境信息公開的政策變遷：路徑與邏輯解釋
3.	日本三一一地震後臺灣反核輿論的解析：問卷調查研究
4.	政策變遷整合性分析架構之研究：臺灣菸害防制政策的觀察
5.	臺灣教師教育政策改革分析

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫