:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:淹水對沿海地層下陷區之貧窮家庭的社會影響--以臺灣西海岸漁村為例
書刊名:臺灣社會工作學刊
作者:王永慈 引用關係游進裕林碧亮
作者(外文):Wang, Yeong-tsyrYu, SiniteLin, Bi-liang
出版日期:2013
卷期:11
頁次:頁81+83-113
主題關鍵詞:地層下陷淹水貧窮社會脆弱性環境正義Land subsidenceFloodingPovertySocial vulnerabilityEnvironmental justice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:118
  • 點閱點閱:89
本研究檢視淹水對於台灣西海岸地層下陷區貧窮家庭之社會影響,此區域被認定為台灣第一批氣候變遷難民之地區。此地區淹水之主要原因為地層下陷的問題,也因為全球氣候變遷,海平面上升,驟雨增加之故。本研究的調查時間為2010年的10-12月,針對中低收入與低收入家庭的普查,成功問卷有177戶。主要發現如下:(一)67.2%的家庭在2009-2010年夏天經歷淹水的問題。(二)在14個社會影響指標中,影響最大的有:交通、心理健康、住家房子、家中經濟、工作、電與水的使用。(三)家中有孩子/老人、主要家計負擔者為女性、自我評估健康較差者、主觀貧窮者都是解釋淹水的社會影響的重要因素。然而,這些漁村的社會支持網絡仍不可忽略。最後,本文強調淹水的社會影響是多層面的,政府不應忽略此議題的複雜性:同時環境正義的議題也需要更加地重視。
The purpose of the paper is to examine the impacts of floods on the poor in fishing villages where had been identified as the first climate refugees on the west coast of Taiwan. Besides the land subsidence, people also experience the risk of floods due to the increase of precipitation and the rise of sea levels. The structured questionnaire method and face-to-face interviews had been conducted from Oct. to Dec., 2010. All poor households receiving public cash assistances had been interviewed. The sample size is 177. The main findings are as follows: (1) 67.2% of the respondents experienced the flood damages during 2009 and 2010, particularly in summer. (2) Among the 14 indicators of social impacts, poor people suffered most in terms of transportations, mental health, housing, economic insecurity, employment, electricity and water usage. And (3) Poor families with children, poor families with elderly, females, people with poor self-rated health and high subjective poverty were significant factors for explaining the social impacts of the flooding. However, one still can find strengths from those economically disadvantaged. The level of social support and the level of community solidarity were not low in those villages. Finally, the social impacts of floods are multi-dimensional but governments usually ignore the complexity of the flood impacts. The issue of environmental justice needs to be reemphasized when discussing flood risk exposures.
期刊論文
1.李香潔、盧鏡臣(2010)。氣候變遷社會脆弱性的發展及其可能應用。國研科技,25,53-61。  延伸查詢new window
2.卓春英、盧芷儀(20100900)。貧窮、社會性別、與災難。社區發展季刊,131,154-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bell, K.(2011)。Environmental justice in Cuba。Critical Social Policy,31(2),245-265。  new window
4.Elvers, Horst-Dietrich、Gross, M.、Heinrichs, H.(2008)。The diversity of environmental justice: Towards a European approach。European Societies,10(5),835-856。  new window
5.Green, C.(2004)。The Evaluation of Vulnerability to Flooding。Disaster Prevention and Management,13(4),323-29。  new window
6.Laksmono, V. S.、Cynthia Pattiasina、A. Sirojudin、L. Osbum(2008)。Policy and historical context of disaster relief in Ache relevant factors in social work assessment。Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development,18(2),6-18。  new window
7.Miller, S. E.、Hayward, R. A.、Shaw, T. V.(2012)。Environmental shifts for social worker: a principles approach。International Journal of Social Welfare,21,270-277。  new window
8.Pawar, M.(2008)。The flood of Krishna river and the flood of politics: Dynamics of rescue and relief operations in a village in India。Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development,18(2),19-35。  new window
9.Walker, G.、Bumingham, K.(2011)。Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: Evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context。Critical Social Policy,31(2),216-240。  new window
10.Zakour, M. J.、Harrel, E. B.(2003)。Access to disaster service: Social work interventions for vulnerable populations。Journal of Social Service Research,30(2),27-54。  new window
11.黃之棟、黃瑞祺(20091200)。正義的繼受:我們與美國人講的到底是不是同樣的「環境正義」?。國家發展研究,9(1),85-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃瑞祺、黃之棟(20070600)。環境正義理論的問題點。臺灣民主季刊,4(2),113-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.郭翡玉(20100300)。因應氣候變遷之國土調適策略--以臺灣沿海地區為例。都市與計劃,37(1),47-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王永慈(20010900)。「社會排除」--貧窮概念的再詮釋。社區發展季刊,95,72-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基(20091200)。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報,10(3),163-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Thrush, D.、Burningham, K.、Fielding, J.(2005)。Vulnerability with Regard to Flood Warming and Flood Event: a review of the literature。Bristol:Environment Agency。  new window
圖書
1.Coulthard, M.、Walker, A.、Morgan, A.(2002)。People'€™s Perceptions of their Neighborhood and Community Involvement: Results from the social capital module of the General Household Survey 2000。London:The Stationery Office。  new window
2.Eurostat(2010)。Combating poverty and social exclusion。A statistical portrait of the European Union。  new window
3.Van den Bosch, Karel(2001)。Identifying the Poor: Using Subjective and Consensual Measures。Aldershot:Ashgate Publishing Limited。  new window
4.Gordon, D.、Adelman, L.、Ashworth, K.、Bradshaw, J.、Levitas, R.、Middleton, S.、Pantazis, C.、Patsios, D.、Payne, S.、Townsend, P.、Williams, J.(2000)。Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain。Joseph Rowntree Foundation。  new window
5.Pantazis, Christina、Gordon, David、Levitas, Ruth(2006)。Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey。Policy Press。  new window
其他
1.Dominelli, L(2010)。Climate change: social workers, roles and contributions to policy debates and intervention,http://onlinelibrary.wi1ey.com/doi/10_1111/i_1468-2397_2011_00795_x/pdf, 2011/01/29。  new window
2.Fielding, J.(2007)。Environmental injustice or just the lie of the land: an investigation of the socio-economic class of those at risk flooding in England and Wales,http://www.socresonline.org.Uk/12/4/4/4.pdf, 2011/01/29。  new window
3.Scotland Northern Ireland for Environmental Research (SNIFFER)(2009)。Differential social impact of climate change in the UK,http://www.sniffer.org.uk/Webcontrol/Secure/ClientSpeciflc/ResourceManagement/UploadedFiles/UKCC22%20LiteratureReview%20web.pdf, 2011/01/29。  new window
圖書論文
1.林萬億(2011)。災難管理與社會工作。社會工作與臺灣社會。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE