:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術標準制定與競爭法規範及專利權濫用之檢討
書刊名:科技法律評析
作者:周伯翰
作者(外文):Jou, Bo-han
出版日期:2012
卷期:5
頁次:頁39-91
主題關鍵詞:技術標準標準制定組織競爭法限制競爭不公平競爭關鍵設施理論專利權濫用聯合授權光碟專利Technical standardStandard-setting organizationCompetition lawRestrict competitionUnfair competitionEssential facilities doctrinePatent misuseLicensing of patent poolsCD-R patent
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:1
技術標準制定及標準制定組織之專利政策可防止濫用專利權致損害交易秩序與公平競爭等公共利益,但其亦須適度保護發明者之專利權,而其重心在於謀求與技術標準制定及其專利政策有關之競爭法規範與專利法規範的有效調和。本文乃先研究法制先進國家與地區與技術標準制定及其專利政策有關之法律規範與重要案例並進行分析檢討,且研究競爭法中之關鍵設施理論與其相關案例是否能適用於技術標準制定之領域及其適用條件,再就國內相關之法規(例如公平交易法及其子法與電信法及其子法)和重要案例(例如飛利浦公司、新力公司與太陽誘電公司之光碟專利聯合授權案)加以研究並進行分析檢討,以作為相關法規修訂、司法機關審理以及技術標準所涉及之專利權人與有意實施該專利權之業者進行協商之參考。
The patent policy of technical standards and standard-setting organization can prevent patent misuse which will damage trading order and fair competition, the public interest, but also need to appropriately protect the patents of the inventors. The point is seeking to effectively reconcile the competition law norms and patent law norms relating to the setting of technical standards and its patent policy. The first study and review of this article is the legal system and important cases relating to the setting of technical standards and its patent policy in advanced countries and regions; moreover, the article will study and review whether the essential facilities doctrine of competition law and related cases are applicable in the field of the setting of technical standards and their application conditions; furthermore, the article will study and review the relevant domestic laws and regulations (such as the Fair Trade Act and its sub-law and the Telecommunications Act and its sub-law) and important cases (such as the joint patent licensing case of Philips, Sony and Taiyo Yuden Company Disc), in order to make the reference to the modification of the relevant laws and regulations, the judiciary hearing as well as the negotiation between the owners of the patents involved in the technical standards and the business interested in the implementation of the patents.
期刊論文
1.Mccurdy, Gregory V. S.(2003)。Intellectual Property and Competition: Does the Essential Facilities Doctrine Shed Any New Light?。European Intellectual Property Review,25(10),472-480。  new window
2.周伯翰(20091000)。專利強制授權與競爭制度之調和。萬國法律,167,68-78。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dolmans, Maurits(2002)。Standards for Standards。Fordham International Law Journal,26,163-170。  new window
4.李素華(20080400)。專利權行使與公平交易法--以近用技術標準之關鍵專利為中心。公平交易季刊,16(2),85-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃銘傑(2006)。競爭法與智慧財產法之交會--相生與相剋之間。台北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉孔中(2007)。智慧財產法制的關鍵革新。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊禎(2000)。英美契約法論。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Goldstein, Larry M.、Kearsey, Brain N.(2004)。Technology Patent Licensing: An International Reference On 21st Century Patent Licensing, Patent Pools And Patent Platforms。  new window
5.Hovenkamp, Herbert、Janis, Mark D.、Lemley, Mark A.(2002)。IP and Antitrust: An Analysis Of Antitrust Principles Applied To Intellectual Property Law。  new window
其他
1.U. S. Department of Justice,The Federal Trade Commission(2007)。Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition,http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/hearings/ip/222655.pdf。  new window
2.公平交易委員會對於技術授權協議案件之處理原則,http://www.ftc.gov.tw/intemet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=163&docid=227。  延伸查詢new window
3.Anticipating the 21st Century: Competition Policy in the New High-Tech, Global Marketplace,http://www.ftc.gov/opp/hitech/global.htm。  new window
4.Antitrust Guideline for the Licensing of Intellectual Property,http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0558.htm。  new window
5.(20010601)。Guideline on the Applicability on Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Horizontal Cooperation Agreement,http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001Y0106(01):EN:NOT。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE