本研究針對教科書評選作業之法規制訂、組織與成員、評選程序等層面建立檢核項目，並據以調查國小教科書評選作業概況。研究建立之教科書評選作業檢核項目，共包含20個大項、84個子項。多數項目均被評定為適切、合理，並具有高度的重要性。部分擴大參與、選後／用後檢討評鑑、評選研究相關項目，被評定為重要程度稍低，但保留納入這些屬於進階性訴求項目，對促使教科書評選作業適切發展仍具有積極意義。參與調查之學校在多數檢核項目上，其教科書評選作業情形雖然可以接受，但能夠普遍達到理想狀態者卻也有限，並且有法規制訂疏漏瑕疵、運作不符法令、未能與時俱進、未能意識存在的缺失，以及未能實踐更佳的理念或做法等問題之存在。

This study, devoted to establishing a checklist for textbook selection, consisted of three dimensions, including formulating selection regulations, organizations and members, and selection procedures. The checklist was employed to investigate the operational status of textbook selection for Taiwanese elementary schools. The textbook selection checklist established for this study consists of 20 items and 84 sub-items. Most sub-items were determined to be appropriate, reasonable, and highly important by participants. Although some sub-items related to members involving textbook selection, post-selection and post-adoption evaluation implementation, and textbook selection research were graded as less important by participants, it was determined that keeping the sub-items on the checklist would be helpful for promoting appropriate textbook selection. Schools that participated in the textbook select investigation found the majority of items were acceptable, but an ideal situation is rarely realized. In addition, some problems, such as imperfect formulating of textbook selection regulations, divergences between selection regulations and actual operations, lack of improvement in the operational system over time, not noticing existing defects and irrationality, and poor implementation of better ideas or practices on textbook selection, were existed.