臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國的保育役權及其對我國之借鏡價值
書刊名：國立中正大學法學集刊
作者：陳仲嶙 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chung-lin
出版日期：2013
卷期：41
頁次：頁193-237
主題關鍵詞：保育役權；土地信託組織；國民信託；農育權；環境信託；土地保育；Conservation easement；Land trust；National trust；Right to agriculture and conservation；Environmental trust；Land conservation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:141
以民間自己的力量，透過取得對特定土地之管理或監督的權限而直接地進行該土地的生態環境或永續性之維護，已成為保育努力愈來愈受重視的一環。雖然在現行法下，已有多種法律工具可運用於此項保育策略，特別是透過取得所有權或接受信託之方式而得管理土地，但在實際推動上，往往還是遇到一些困難。探尋新的法律工具，以促成民間力量在保育工作上更大的擴展，即成為重要之課題。本研究認為，美國的保育役權於私部門土地保育之推動，相較於其他我國目前可資運用之法律工具，具有對保育團體成本較低、被土地所有人接受之可能性更高等制度優勢，值得在立法上考慮。
The practices that the private sector devotes to direct land conservation by acquiring the powers of managing or monitoring land have become a strategy that drawn more and more attention. There are several legal instruments that could be used to perform this strategy under current law, such as acquiring land by purchase, gift, or in trust. However, using those instruments often encounters difficulties in practice. Therefore, seeking innovative legal instruments to prompt private land conservation becomes an important issue.This study argues that conservation easement in the United States has relative institutional merits, including low costs for conservation groups and high acceptability for land owners, in comparison to existing legal instruments in Taiwan and is a valuable mechanism to be adopted.
期刊論文
1.吳行浩(20081100)。論環境信託制度之理論與實際：以美國法經驗與對我國之立法借鏡為中心。高大法學論叢，4，85-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳仲嶙(201212)。爲環境信託開啓新視野：論私部門從事土地保育的法律工具類型。科技法律評論，9(2)，45-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊崇森(20070800)。英國國民信託(National Trust)之發展與對各國之影響。法令月刊，58(8)，16-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Airey, Shea B.(2010)。Conservation Easements in Private Practice。Real Prop. Tr. and Est. L.J.，44，745-822。  new window
5.Arpad, Alexander R.(2002)。Private Transactions, Public Benefits, and Perpetual Control over the Use of Real Property: Interpreting Conservation Easements as Charitable Trusts。Real Prop. Prob. and Tr. J.，37，91-149。  new window
6.Bray, Zachary(2010)。Reconciling Development and Natural Beauty: The Promise of Conservation Easements。Harv. Envtl. L. Rev.，34，119-177。  new window
7.Cheever, Federico(1996)。Public Good and Private Magic in the Law of Land Trusts and Conservation Easements: A Happy Present and a Troubled Future。Denv. U. L. Rev.，73，1077-102。  new window
8.Gisler, Erin B.(2009)。Comment, Land Trusts in the Twenty-First Century: How Tax Abuse and Corporate Governance Threaten the Integrity of Charitable Land Preservation。Santa Clara L. Rev.，49(4)，1123-1151。  new window
9.Hodge, Ian、Castle, Richard(199403/04)。Covenants for the Countryside。Conv.，122-128。  new window
10.Humphrey, Douglas M.(2010)。The “Interior” Revenue Service: The Tax Code as a Vehicle for Third-Party Enforcement of Conservation Easements。B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev.，37，425-461。  new window
11.Jay, Jessica E.(2000)。Land Trust Risk Management of Legal Defense and Enforcement of Conservation Easements: Potential Solutions。Environmental Law，6，441-501。  new window
12.King, Mary Ann、Fairfax, Sally K.(2006)。Public Accountability and Conservation Easements: Learning from the Uniform Conservation Easement Act Debates。Nat. Resources J，46，65-129。  new window
13.Lippmann, Jessica Owley(2006)。The Emergence of Exacted Conservation Easements。Neb. L. Rev.，84，1043-112。  new window
14.McLaughlin, Nancy A.(2002)。The Role of Land Trusts in Biodiversity Conservation on Private Lands。Idaho L. Rev.，38，453-472。  new window
15.McLaughlin, Nancy A.(2008)。Condemning Conservation Easements: Protecting the Public Interest and Investment in Conservation。U.C. Davis L. Rev.，41，1897-967。  new window
16.Morrisette, Peter M.(2001)。Conservation Easements and the Public Good: Preserving the Environment on Private Lands。Nat. Resources J.，41，373-426。  new window
17.Smith, Ann Harris(2010)。Conservation Easements Violated: What Next? A Discussion of Remedies。Fordham Envtl. L. Rev.，20，597-635。  new window
18.Tapick, Jeffrey(2002)。Threats to the Continued Existence of Conservation Easements。Colum. J. Envtl. L.，27，257-296。  new window
19.鄭冠宇(20100600)。不動產役權之修正與適用。月旦民商法雜誌，28，91-108。  延伸查詢new window
20.謝在全(20100215)。物盡其用與永續利用--民法用益物權之修正。臺灣法學雜誌，146，1-22。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡明誠(20021200)。既成巷道之公用地役關係與所謂公用人役權問題--最高法院八十九年度臺上字第二五○○號判決評釋。月旦法學，91，305-317。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.葉俊榮(20081206)。從訴訟公民到環境法院：環境公民訴訟於台灣的實踐與檢討。第8屆行政法理論與實務研討會，最高行政法院 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林志昌(2006)。農業地役權應用與實施方式之研究-以行政契約為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.董郢(201207)。公益信託之硏究--兼論英美之保護地役權(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台灣環境資訊協會(200903)。環境信託--給大地一個永恆的許諾。台灣環境資訊協會。  延伸查詢new window
2.東吳大學法學院(201103)。英美法常用名詞解析。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
3.Booth, Douglas E.(2007)。Land Trusts and Biodiversity。BookSurge Publishing。  new window
4.Brewer, Richard(2003)。Conservancy: The Land Trust Movement in America。Dartmouth。  new window
5.Fairfax, Sally K.、Guenzler, Darla(2001)。Conservation Trusts。Trusts, Univ Pr of Kansas。  new window
6.Goldstein, Debra Wolf(2002)。Using Conservation Easements to Preserve Open Space: A Guide for Pennsylvania's Municipalities。Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation。  new window
7.Gray, Kevin、Gray, Susan Francis(2009)。Elements of Land Law, Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Lind, Brenda(1991)。The Conservation Easement Stewardship Guide。Land Trust Alliance。  new window
9.Timothy, Lindstrom, C.(2008)。A Tax Guide to Conservation Easements。Island Press。  new window
10.Nelson, Grant S.、Whitman, Dale A.(2003)。Real Estate Transfer, Finance, and Development。West Group。  new window
11.Rabin, Edward H.(2000)。Fundamentals of Modern Property Law。Foundation Press。  new window
12.Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr.(2002)。A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House。Mariner Books。  new window
13.Singer, Joseph William(2006)。Property Law。Aspen Publishers。  new window
14.Sloan, Amy E.(2003)。Basic Legal Research。Aspen Publishers。  new window
15.Prohaska, Jane(2008)。Conservation Easements: Overview。  new window
16.Squires, Roderick H.(2000)。Introduction to Legal Analysis。Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present, and Future。  new window
17.鄭玉波(199210)。民法債編各論。臺北：三民。  延伸查詢new window
18.王澤鑑(201006)。民法物權。台北：王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
19.謝哲勝(20100600)。民法物權。三民。  延伸查詢new window
20.謝在全(200706)。民法物權論。臺北：新學林。  延伸查詢new window
21.謝哲勝(200903)。信託法。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國荒地保護協會。自然谷環境教育基地--荒野保護協會環境信託，http://sowtrust.sow.org.tw/， 2012/08/24。  延伸查詢new window
2.杰峯。從暖身到鳴槍之間--通過許可之前的故事，荒野--自然谷環境信託教育基地，http://sowtrust.sow.org.tw/2011/12/blog-post_14.html， 20120831。  延伸查詢new window
3.溫于璇，孫秀如，耿璐。給棲地保育一條方便之徑，環境資訊中心。，http://e-info.org.tw/node/43261， 2012/08/30。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gustanski, Julie Ann(2000)。Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements, Voluntary Actions, and Private Lands。Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present, and Future。Island Press。  new window
2.Mayo, Todd D.(2000)。A Holistic Examination of the Law of Conservation Easements。Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present, and Future。Island Press。  new window
3.葉俊榮(2006)。環境法上的公民訴訟：論制度引進的原意與現實的落差。跨世紀法學新思維：法學叢刊創刊五十週年。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：492（臺灣：491，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67768138
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上