:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:適性化設計對不同年級學童閱讀電子書成效與動機之影響:以「健康飲食」單元為例
書刊名:教育資料與圖書館學
作者:王佩瑜 引用關係王秀鳳 引用關係劉怡君
作者(外文):Wang, Pei-yuWang, Hsiu-fengLiu, Yi-chun
出版日期:2013
卷期:51:2
頁次:頁267-291
主題關鍵詞:電子書適性化設計小學教育人機介面E-bookAdaptive designElementary educationHuman-computer interface
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:91
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究在探討電子書適性化設計對國小不同年級學童閱讀電子書之成效與動機影響。此為一個二因子的實驗設計;其自變項為年級(四年級、五年級)與電子書適性化設計(「適性化電子書」組、「非適性化圖像型電子書」組、「非適性化文字型電子書」組)。實驗教材取自國小「神奇的營養素」單元。本研究實驗對象為彰化縣某小學四、五年級學童共一百位,使用隨機分派方式分為三組。研究結果顯示年級和電子書適性化設計於學童之學習認知與學習動機上有交互作用。四年級學童使用「適性化電子書」者其記憶、應用與注意力之表現顯著較佳。五年級學童對不同電子書適性化設計之反應於三組中均無顯著差異。結果顯示電子書適性化設計對低年齡層(四年級)學童更具重要性。
This study aimed to explore the impact of age and adaptive design on elementary students’reading of e-books. This study was a two-way experimental design where the first factor was learner age (4th and 5th grade) and the second factor was e-book adaptive design (adaptive, non-adaptive visual, non-adaptive verbal). The e-books used in this study targeted six major classes of nutrients as content. This study was guided by the following question: Is there any interaction between age and e-book adaptive design on learning achievement (recall and transfer) and learning motivation (attention, relevance and confidence)? A sample of one hundred 4th and 5th graders participated in the study, and participants were randomly assigned into one of three groups. They were asked to do a pre-test first, and then they read their assigned e-books for twenty minutes. After they finished reading, they were given a post-test. The results showed significant interactions between age and the e-book adaptive design. For the 4th graders, the adaptive e-book group worked best in recall, transfer and attention scores. For the 5th graders, there was no significant difference among these three e-book designs. This revealed that the adaptive design is more critical for younger children. This study hoped to broaden theories on multimedia learning for young learners and serve as a reference for elementary school teachers and e-book designers.
期刊論文
1.黃國豪、葉晟德、王士晉、陳碧茵、林春合、賴世偉(20071000)。結合多風格量表之適性化數位學習系統。理工研究學報,41(2),25-42。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chall, J. S.、Jacobs, V. A.(2003)。The classic study on poor children's fourth-grade slump。American Educator,27(1),14-17。  new window
3.Brusilovsky, P.(1996)。Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia。User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction,6(2/3),87-129。  new window
4.Messick, S.(1994)。The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching。Educational Psychologist,29(3),121-136。  new window
5.Massa, L. J.、Mayer, R. E.(2006)。Testing the ATI hypothesis: should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?。Learning and Individual Difference,16(4),321-335。  new window
6.Litzinger, T. A.、Lee, S. H.、Wise, J. C.、Felder, R. M.(2007)。A psychometric study of the index of learning styles。Journal of Engineering Education,96(4),309-319。  new window
7.Green, K. E.、Schroeder, D. H.(1990)。Psychometric quality of the Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire as a measure of cognitive style。Psychological Reports,66(3),939-945。  new window
8.Pask, G.、Scott, B. C. E.(1972)。Learning strategies and individual competence。International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,4(3),217-253。  new window
9.Popescu, E.、Badina, C.、Moraret, L.(201011)。Accommodating learning styles in an adaptive educational system。Informatica,34,451-462。  new window
10.Kollöffel, B.(2012)。Exploring the relation between visualizer-verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material。Computers and Education,58(2),697-706。  new window
11.Felder, Richard M.、Silverman, L. K.(1988)。Learning and teaching styles in engineering education。Engineering Education,78(7),674-681。  new window
12.Keller, John M.(1987)。Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design。Journal of Instructional Development,10(3),2-10。  new window
13.王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬(20080600)。一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報,39(4),555-568。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李文瑞(19901100)。介紹激發學習動機的ARCS模型(阿課思)教學策略。臺灣教育,479,22-24。  延伸查詢new window
15.葉連祺、林淑萍(20030100)。布魯姆認知領域教育目標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究月刊,105,94-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.顏文成、黃明祥(2009)。從適性化的觀點來探討數位學習網站之應用--以魯凱族文化學習之實證研究。第20屆國際資訊管理學術研討會。台北:世新大學。2080-2091。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖岳祥、柯欣儀、黃順彬、廖晉宏(2011)。應用數位學習於國語文標點符號教學--以南投縣某國小為例。2011數位科技與創新管理研討會。台北:華梵大學資訊管理學系。368-381。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gilbert, J. E.、Han, C. Y.(1999)。Arthur: Adapting instruction to accommodate learning style。WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet 1999。Chesapeake, VA:AACE。433-438。  new window
學位論文
1.呂劍英(2009)。國三學生的學習風格與自然科學習興趣之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁展綺(2009)。國小五年級學童數學閱讀能力、後設認知與認知型式之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉天翔(2009)。國小四年級學童數學閱讀能力、後設認知與認知型式之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Siegler, R. S.、Alibali, M. W.、林美珍(2004)。兒童認知發展:概念與應用。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃羨文(1997)。紙本書與電子書之比較。臺北市:漢美圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chall, J. S.(1983)。Stages of reading development。McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.張春興(2007)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華。  延伸查詢new window
5.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
其他
1.李蕙蓉(1997)。「學校午餐食物內容及營養基準」及建立食譜範例報告,台北市:教育部體育司。,http://140.122.72.62/historyfile/%E4%BF%AE%E8%A8%82%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E7%87%9F%E9%A4%8A%E5%8D%88%E9%A4%90%E5%8F%8A%E5%BB%BA%E7%AB%8B%E9%A3%9F%E8%AD%9C%E7%AF%84%E4%BE%8B%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.doc。  new window
2.教育部(2011)。國小學生體位趨勢,台北市:教育部國民及學前教育署。,https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/gender/511-3.xls。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wolf, C.(2002)。iWeaver: Towards an interactive web-based adaptive learning environment to address individual learning styles,http://www.eurodl.org/?article=61。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE