Civil Code contracts, by nature of the payout types, can be distinguished into one-time contracts and continuous contracts. The content of the contracts that does not increase with the time following the realization of the one-time payout constitutes as onetime contracts, whereas in terms of continuous contracts, it refers to contracts with consistent or uninterrupted payouts over a period of time in order to achieve the purpose of the contract and to cease the debt relation. Also in terms of the payout content of continuous contracts, it encompasses continuous supply contracts, meaning when the contract parties agree to a scope of payouts and within a period of time for making each of the supply, where the contract specifies one party is to continue supplying a particular type of goods or material to the other party within a specified or unspecified period of time, and the other party is to pay a fixed amount of payment. As the critical elements for a continuous supply contract to sustain and for the two parties to exercising their entitlements remain very important in practical implementation, in fact the legal relation and dispute solution of continuous supply contacts, and the specific transactions under the Consumer Protection Law are critical issues that warrant further examination, particularly pertaining to a wide range of tangible products or intangible services, contract sustaining critical elements, ceasing to exist and reinstating to its original state and the like, which still remain controversial in academic theory and practical implementation, as a majority of people still reckon to moderating the contract parties' legal relation using the fair principle or value weighing method, meaning using a contract termination to cease the validity of a contract so to avoid complicating the legal relation is deemed a more adequate method.