:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:小組檔案評量在國小運動教育模式教學之行動研究
書刊名:臺灣運動教育學報
作者:蕭明芳林靜萍 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Ming-fangLin, Ching-ping
出版日期:2010
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁67-91
主題關鍵詞:檔案評量體育教學評量運動教育模式樂樂棒球Portfolio assessmentAssessments of physical educationSport education modelTee ball
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:53
本研究主要目的在探討小組檔案評量於國小運動教育模式體育教學之實踐歷程及其對學生學習的影響。採行動研究的方式,以佳佳國小六年級一個班級為研究對象,進行 11週的樂樂棒球課程。本研究小組檔案評量於體育領域教學中的實踐歷程為:先確認教學問題、發展行動策略,其次,將小組檔案評量的內容融入教學,過程中不斷反省、修正。研究發現:小組檔案評量確實發揮讓學生反省思考的功能,能深入且從多元的面向去瞭解學生的學習成效,在認知方面,透過學習過程反省,增加對動作概念、規則、戰術的理解;在動作技能方面,有助樂樂棒球動作技能的提升;在情意方面,促進團隊合作、感受運動樂趣;在實踐方面,能增進學生參與運動。此外,學生、教師及家長都認為實施小組檔案評量有助學生的學習,並能增加家長、教師與學生之間的互動與溝通。
The primary purpose was to investigate the process of practice for small-group portfolio assessment. Action research was employed to a class of 6th graders in Jia Jia Elementary School, a 11-week Tee ball program was conducted. This practice began with the finding of teaching problems, identification of information, and development of action strategies. Small-group portfolio assessment would be integrated into teaching, while continuous reflection and revision were carried out throughout the process. The research finfings were: small-group portfolio assessment could help students demonstrate their reflection competence. Teachers could also evaluate students’ performance from multiple perspectives. In terms of cognition, students’ understanding of the movement, rules, and tactics of Tee ball game could be enhanced via reflection of learning process. Skills were also improved. The assessment also helped to promote team-work bondage. Students enjoyed the game and the popularity of sports was increased among students. In brief, students, teachers, and parents considered that the implementation of small-group portfolio assessment was helpful to students’ learning, and could enhance the interaction and communication among parents, teachers, and students.
期刊論文
1.Hastie, P. A.(2000)。An ecological analysis of a sport education season。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,19(3),355-373。  new window
2.Silverman, S.(1999)。Can girls have success in the sport education model?。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,70(4),8。  new window
3.Kinchin, G. D.(2001)。Using team portfolios in a sport education season。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,72(2),41-44。  new window
4.Kirk, M.(1997)。Using portfolios to enhance student learning and assessment。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,68(7),29-33。  new window
5.Veal, M. L.(1988)。Pupil assessment perceptions and practices of secondary teacher。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,7,327-342。  new window
6.Veal, M. L.(1992)。School-based theories of pupil assessment: A case study。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63,48-59。  new window
7.吳清山、林天佑(1997)。卷宗評量。教育資料與研究雙月刊,15(2),46。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃秀文(19960600)。從傳統到變通:教學評量的省思。國民教育研究學報,2,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.許義雄、葉國樑(2000)。「健康與體育領域」之教學評量。翰林文教雜誌,11,12-18。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hastie, P. A.、Trost, S. G.(2002)。Student physical activity levels during a season of sport education。Pediatric Exercise Science,14(1),64-74。  new window
11.Wallhead, T. L.、Ntoumanis, N.(2004)。Effects of a sport education intervention on students' motivation responses in physical education。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,23(1),4-18。  new window
學位論文
1.王瓊惠(2007)。學習歷程檔案在自然與生活科技課程教學應用之探討(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.田麗娟(2001)。國小自然科評量方式之行動研究--以學習歷程檔案評量為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.張瑞珍(2001)。台中地區國小自然科教師對於多元評量的困擾與問題之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃至賢(2006)。運動教育模式對國小學童學習效果及人際關係影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉玉瑩(2004)。教學網站與網路化歷程檔案融入國中數學教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭彥成(2006)。運動教育模式對學生學習效果之研究--以大學體育桌球教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張秋煉(2001)。台北市石牌國小體育課教學對健康體適能影響之探究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.Synder, R. P.(1997)。The effects of a Sport Education Model on the participation and achievement levels of elementary students in physical education class(博士論文)。Ohio State University。  new window
9.陳昭宇(2004)。運動教育模式對學生技能學習與學習態度之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.呂天得(1999)。運動教育模式在男女學生學習效果之研究--以國小六年級排球教學為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
11.顏嘉生(2005)。不同運動教育模式對學生學習效果之比較--以國小六年級巧固球教學為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳勝雄(2004)。不同體育課程設計模式對國小學生體育課學習滿意度之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳春蓮(2004)。體育教學的反省與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Melograno, Vincent J.(1998)。Professional and student portfolios for physical education。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
3.Lund, J. L.(1999)。Creating rubrics for physical education。Reston, VA:National Association for Sport and Physical Education。  new window
4.巫偉鈴、陳俊豪(2007)。健康與體育學習領域之評量策略。中小學健康與體育學習領域之教學與實務。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Danielson, C.、Abrutyn, L.、鄭英耀、蔡佩玲(2003)。檔案教學。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.Rink, Judith E.、許義雄、黃月嬋(2001)。體育教學策略。台北:藝軒。  延伸查詢new window
7.Robett, L. L.、Norman, E. G.、鄒慧英(2003)。測驗與評量--在教學上的應用。台北:洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。精華。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.林靜萍(2006)。體育教學策略與多元評量之運用。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.闕月清、黃志成(2008)。理解式球類教學評量。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top