:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生態保育、在地發展與遷村--山林守護在西魯凱的實踐經驗
書刊名:台灣原住民族研究學報
作者:台邦.撒沙勒裴家騏盧道杰柯文福賴正杰
作者(外文):Taiban, SasalaPei, KurtisLu, Tao-chiehKe, Wen-fuLai, Cheng-jie
出版日期:2011
卷期:1:3
頁次:頁109-138
主題關鍵詞:莫拉克風災民族發展遷村山林守護共管機制傳統領域Typhoon MorakotNational developmentRelocationForest guardCo-management mechanismTraditional territory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:102
  • 點閱點閱:165
在2009年莫拉克風災中,屏東縣災情嚴重,魯凱族聚居的霧台鄉更是首當其衝,總計八個部落中有五個部落面臨遷村的命運,這個事實不僅造成西魯凱群社會文化的急遽動盪,甚且可能導致魯凱族崩解的危機。近來,極端氣候對原住民族的文化永續及社會發展帶來嚴重的衝擊,因此逐漸成為國際社會關注的議題。許多研究顯示,部落重建或遷村的討論,不僅需要考量族人生命財產的安全與國土的復育,更需要顧及文化的傳承、部落社會的完整與族人發展的意願。我們認為現階段,維持族人與鄉土的連結,甚而讓族人直接參與相關的大地和自然資源復育的工作,並在過程中醞釀符合各界期待的山林方案,才是災後重建工作能否有效推展的關鍵。基於這樣的觀點,本計畫在霧台鄉公所協助之下,召募並雇用了18位在地族人接受培力,擔任山林巡守員的角色,執行部落周邊及傳統領域的巡護及監測作業。總計在過去近一年的時間裡,山林巡守隊進行了187次(日間182次、夜間5次)短程的部落周邊巡守和4次長程的傳統領域巡守工作。過程中,巡守隊員除了標定許多傳統文化載點、重要野生動植物位置以及風災後造成的崩塌地點之外,還舉發了5起重大的林木採伐違法及異常事件。事實展現,以在地族人為主體的山林巡守所產生的效益,除了巡護、記錄與監測山林資源並提供科學性資訊之外,還可發揮強化在地警政、防災和水土保持等相關業務的功能。本計畫由原住民族委員會及鄉公所主導,有別於過去由林務單位、國家公園或其他生態環境治理機關推動的方案,不僅展現其族群特色,更凸顯共管機制在地方實踐的可行性。本研究發現,傳統知識的引進,部落實務能力的建構、中高階管理人才的培育、各公部門間的合作協商、專業團隊的輔導、部落,以及族人的支持和加盟,都將是原住民族山林守護制度常態化運作的關鍵議題。
The 2009 Typhoon Morakot was a serious disaster for Pingtung County in southern Taiwan. The indigenous Rukai-inhabited Wutai Township bore the brunt of the damage: of Wutai's eight villages, five were relocated from the mountains to the lowlands. For the southern Rukai this sudden and turbulent socio-cultural change is a serious matter, potentially resulting in the collapse of Rukai society. Recently, extreme climate change has severely impacted the sustainable development of indigenous culture across the world, resulting in this issue gradually becoming a part of the international community's agenda. Many studies have shown that when discussing the relocation and reconstruction of communities, not only must peoples' lives and property along with national land restoration be considered; even more attention must be given to cultural heritage, the intactness of tribal institutions and societies, and the aspirations of tribespeople regarding community development. We believe that at the present stage, maintaining the relationship that the Rukai have with their land and directly involving the tribespeople in natural resource restoration and management work, in the process keeping in mind the expectations that all involved parties may have for the forests, is crucial in successful post-disaster reconstruction. In light of this, the Wutai Township Office recruited 18 local Rukai tribesmen to receive mountain forest patrol training, the monitored areas including village peripheries and traditional tribal territories. Besides demarcating many traditional points of cultural relevance, identifying wild plants and animals in the area, and detecting the precise zones of collapse post-typhoon, patrol team members also played a significant role in detecting the illegal felling of five great trees and suspicious activity. This illustrates the effectiveness of the mountain patrol; in addition to monitoring forest resources and providing scientific information, they can also strengthen local authorities, contribute to soil conservation and disaster prevention. Implemented by the Council of Indigenous Peoples and the township office, unlike past instances where the Forestry Bureau, National Park Services, or other environmental management agencies dominated, this effort not only allows ethnic characteristics to emerge, but also highlights the feasibility of putting co-management of the region into practice. Our study found that the keys issues of concern when initiating an indigenous forest guard system include the incorporation of traditional knowledge, tribal capacity building, cultivation of individuals at high-level management positions, cooperation between public sectors, counsel from specialized experts, and the support and participation of local tribespeople.
期刊論文
1.鹿野忠雄(1931)。紅頭嶼の蕃使用する船。人類學雜誌,46(7),262-272。  延伸查詢new window
2.Castetter, Edward F.(1944)。The Domain of Ethnobiology。American Naturalist,78(775),158-170。  new window
3.鹿野忠雄(1946)。バシ海峽を中心とせる台灣とフイりっピの文化關係--動植物語彙より見たる。東南亞細亞民族學先史學研究,1,113-161。  延伸查詢new window
4.台邦.撒沙勒、陳傑明(20090600)。好茶遷村計畫--一個社會人類學的初步考察。臺灣原住民族研究季刊,2(2),115-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.衛惠林(1963)。魯凱族的親族組織與階級制度。中國民族學報,1963(3),1-18。  延伸查詢new window
6.許功明(19871200)。由社會階層看藝術行為與儀式在交換體系中的地位--以好茶村魯凱族為例。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,62,179-203。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝志誠、張紉、蔡培慧、王俊凱(20081200)。臺灣災後遷村政策之演變與問題。住宅學報,17(2),81-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉炯錫、黃春菱、蘇峰民、董美妹、施習德(19990600)。蘭嶼漁人部落潮間帶螃蟹文化之調查研究。臺東師院學報,10,201-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張燦穩(19910300)。蘭嶼椰油村雅美族人儀式性漁撈活動之漁場利用型態。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告,17,147-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.台邦.撒沙勒(20081200)。傳統領域的裂解與重構:Kucapungane人地圖譜與空間變遷的再檢視。考古人類學刊,69,9-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳志梧、鄧宗德(19900200)。東埔社布農族生活空間的變遷(1945-1990):一個政治經濟學的考察。臺灣社會研究,3(1),51-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.衞惠林(19651100)。臺灣土著社會的部落組織與權威制度。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,25/26,71-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭惠英(19850600)。雅美的大船文化。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,57,95-155。  延伸查詢new window
14.Hardin, Garrett(1968)。The tragedy of the commons。Science,162(3859),1243-1248。  new window
15.胡台麗(19951200)。賽夏矮人祭歌舞祭儀的「疊影」現象。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,1-61。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳燕和(19930400)。臺東太麻里溪流域的東排灣人。民族學研究所資料彙編,7,1-402。  延伸查詢new window
17.裴家騏(2003)。再造山林守護神--雙鬼湖野生動物保護芻議。臺灣林業,30(1),26-33。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.盧道杰(2004)。談原鄉部落自然資源經營管理之可行性與發展--傳統狩獵文化與自然資源經營管理。原住民傳統文化產業維護與保存學術研討會,行政院原住民委員會主辦 (會議日期: 2004/07/15-16)。礁溪:佛光大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.汪明輝、林端、裴家騏、巴清良、盧道杰、吳雯菁(2006)。原住民族傳統慣習之調查整理及評估納入現行法體系之研究--鄒族、魯凱篇。嘉義:財團法人鄒族文化藝術基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧道杰、台邦.撒沙勒、裴家騏、蔡博文(2007)。林務單位與原住民族建構資源共管理機制之研究 (計畫編號:96農科-7.2.3-務-e3)。台北:台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.邱中治(1997)。魯凱族霧台聚落生活領域變遷之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱清榮(1999)。魯凱族阿禮聚落生活領域變遷之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王長華(1984)。多納魯凱族的社會階層及其演變(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳永龍(1992)。社會空間變遷之研究--以魯凱族好茶社為個案(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐君臨(1989)。台灣東部漁民漁場空間認知與漁撈活動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.戴永禔(1999)。魯凱族的漁撈文化。台北:祐生基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bryant, Raymond L.(1997)。The Political Ecology of Forestry in Burma 1824-1994。London:Hurst & Company。  new window
3.Evans-Pritchard, Edward(1963)。The Comparative Method in Social Anthropology。London:Athlone Press。  new window
4.Gadgil, Madhav、Ramachandra, Guha(1993)。This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
5.Hecht, Susanna、Cockburn, Alexander(1989)。The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon。Verso。  new window
6.Nazarea, Virginia D.(1999)。Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Local Lives。Tucson:The University of Arizona Press。  new window
7.Peet, Richard、Watts, Michael(1996)。Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, and Social Movements。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Sivaramakrishnan, K.(1999)。Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India。Stanford, Calif:Stanford University Press。  new window
9.林美容、王長華(1985)。霧台鄉誌:霧臺鄉魯凱族社會文化調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
10.許木柱、李壬癸、楊翎、王長華、潘英海、詹琪芬(1995)。重修臺灣省通志。台北:臺灣省文獻會。  延伸查詢new window
11.裴家騏、羅方明(1996)。霧台鄉魯凱族狩獵習性及獵場標定。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉炯錫(2000)。東台灣原住民民族生態學論文集。台東:東台灣研究會。  延伸查詢new window
13.Conklin, C. Harold(1957)。Hanunoo Agriculture: A Report on an Integral System of Shifting Cultivation in the Philippines。Northford:Elliot's Books。  new window
14.Altieri, Miguel A.(1995)。Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
15.Pichón, Fraancisci J.、Uquillas, Jorge E.、Frechione, John(1999)。Traditional and Modern Natural Resource Management in Latin America。Pittsburg:University of Pittsburg Press。  new window
16.Merchant, Carolyn(1994)。Key Concepts in Critical Theory: Ecology。Atlantic Highlands, N.J.:Humanities Press。  new window
17.Levi-Strauss, Claude(1969)。The Raw and the Cooked。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
18.李汝和(1972)。台灣省通志。台北:台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
19.Geertz, Clifford(1983)。Local Knowledge。New York:Basic Book。  new window
20.移川子之藏、宮本延人、馬淵東一、台北帝國大學土俗人種學研究室(1935)。台灣高砂族系統所屬の研究。東京:刀江書院。  延伸查詢new window
21.Berkes, Fikret(1999)。Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management。Taylor & Francis。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hunn, Eugene S.(1999)。The Value of Subsistence for the Future of the World。Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/ Located Lives。Tucson:University of Arizona Press。  new window
2.Escobar, Arturo(1996)。Constructing Nature: Elements for a Poststructural Political Ecology。Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements。London:Routledge。  new window
3.黃應貴(19950000)。土地、家與聚落--東埔社布農人的空間現象。空間、力與社會。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.裴家騏(2001)。善用傳統知識共管資源。把人找回來:在地參與自然資源管理。花蓮:內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE