:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:人因關鍵指標分析運用於臺灣金屬工業中高年齡勞工工作環境改善
書刊名:福祉科技與服務管理學刊
作者:陳冠華林樹強 引用關係游志雲黃耀新Ilma Mufidah
作者(外文):Chen, G. H.Lin, S. C.Yu, C. Y.Huang, Y. H.
出版日期:2014
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁49-62
主題關鍵詞:人因工程關鍵指標分析肌肉骨骼傷害Occupational health and safetyMiddle aged workersKey indicator method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:8
近年來台灣地區隨著經濟發達及醫療公共衛生進步,工業生產面臨人口少子化、勞動人力老年化的衝擊,面對勞動人口老化現象已成為重要的社會經濟議題。職業性肌肉骨骼傷害近年來在我國勞工保險職業病給付中所占的比率甚高,於職業病之議題上頗受重視。此疾病源自勞工因長期執行重複性動作、過度施力及工作姿勢不當,而導致局部的慢性傷害甚至發生下背痛與椎間盤突出等職業病。使得中高齡勞工體能對工作內容與工作環境的適應力減弱。本文的目的是以人因關鍵指標分析方法(Key Indicator Method)分析勞工作業方式,以改善台灣金屬工業中高年齡勞工之工作場所,並協助一家工廠於現場作業環境的工作條件和設施進行研究和改進。研究分析之結果發現,許多台灣金屬中高年工作者大多為男性勞工作業於高風險人因的工作環境,因此迫切需要改善工作環境,以防止任何肌肉骨骼傷害職業傷害的發生。
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze and enhance the work improvement program in Taiwan’s Metal Industry. Two plants’ work conditions and facilities were investigated and improved. It was found that many of the workers are middle-aged men who occupy high risk jobs. Therefore, there is a strong need to improve the work environment to prevent the occurrence of occupational injuries. Method Key Indicator Method (KIM) is a consistent method used to assess risk involvement in manual material loading. It is conducted by quantifying the key indicators individually (time, load, posture and working conditions using rating points) and calculating the risk score and risk range. At Plant 1, observed areas were coil coating, coil packaging, and chemical storage area. The areas observed in Plant 2 were iron cutting, iron scrap, H-type iron conveyor operation, and iron burr trimming area. According to KIM, coil coating area time rating point was 6 before improvement, since lifting/positioning occurs fewer than 500 times per day. The load rating point was 2, since the load was less than 20 kg. The posture rating was 4, since the torso is bent slightly and there is high load on the shoulder. The working condition rating point score was 0, since the working condition is good. Therefore, the risk score is 36, the load status is "increased", and the risk range is 3. Based on the observational results, an improvement plan was designed and implemented to fit the middle-aged workers in the facilities. The rating points were re-assessed afterwards to examine the improvement effectiveness. Results & Discussion The work facilities designed and implemented at Plant 1 are: an additional rotating arm bracket for the coil coating area; height adjustments for pallets, to 80 cm; height adjustment for sleepers’ bottom, to 50 cm; adjustable seat hights and movable brackets for the coil packaging area; and, a lift cart and stairs for the chemical area. All the equipment was designed with a limited budget and timeframe to support ease of use for middle-aged workers. Before the improvements, the risk score ranged between a "medium" load of 16 and "increased" load of 40; after the enhanced improvement program, the range of risk score was reduced to 4 ("low" load) to as high as 36 ("increased" load). In summary, with the analysis of KIM, the enhanced improvement program can reduce the risk score in the areas investigated in the metal plants.
期刊論文
1.潘儀聰、劉俊杰、黃耀新、盧士一、李正隆、游志雲(20130900)。工作現場人因工程危害預防效益個案評估。勞工安全衛生研究季刊,21(3),345-355。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Almeida, S. A.、Williams, K. M.、Shaffer, R. A.、Brodine, S. K.(1999)。Epidemiological patterns of musculoskeletal injuries physical training。Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise,31(8),1176-1182。  new window
3.Bennell, K. L.、Crossley, K.(1996)。Musculoskeletal injuries in track and field: incidence, distribution and risk factors。Australian Journal of Science And Medicine In Sport,28(3),69。  new window
4.Hignett, S.(2003)。Intervention strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries associated with handling patients: a systematic review。Occupational and Environmental Medicine,60(9),e6。  new window
5.Hootman, J. M.、Macera, C. A.、Ainsworth, B. E.、Addy, C. L.、Martin, M.、Blair, S. N.(2002)。Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries among sedentary and physically active adults。Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise,34(5),838-844。  new window
6.KluBmann, A.、Gebhardt, H. J.、Rieger, M. A.、Liebers, R.、Steinberg, U.(2012)。Evaluation of objectivity, reliability and criterion validity of the Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations。Work: A Journal of Prevention. Assessment And Rehabilitation,41,3997-4003。  new window
7.Klussmann, A.、Steinberg, U.、Liebers, F.、Gebhardt, H.、Rieger, M. A.(2010)。The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO): evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study。BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,11(1),272。  new window
8.林彥輝、宋鵬程、葉文裕、游志雲、潘儀聰、陳志勇(20101200)。先進國家肌肉骨骼傷害防制推動計畫探討。勞工安全衛生研究季刊,18(4),483-501。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃力仁(2013)。工業化國家的職業性肌肉骨骼傷害防制探討(碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Steinberg, U.、Behrendt, S.、Caffier, G.(2008)。Key indicator method manual handling operations, design and testing of a practical aid for assessing working conditions。Berlin:Bundesanstalt Für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin。  new window
2.Senders, Mark S.、McCormick, Ernest J.(1987)。Human Factors in Engineering and Design。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top