:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:導論:人物性同異論爭在韓國儒學史上的意義--人物性同異論之發生、展開及意義
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:高在旭
作者(外文):Ko, Jae-wook
出版日期:2014
卷期:41:8=483
頁次:頁3-21
主題關鍵詞:人物性同異論李珥李柬韓元震北伐論北學派新社會階層觀蕩平政治Debate that human nature and things nature are same or differentYi GanHan Won-jinPlan for northern subjugationNorthern Korean learning schoolNew perspective on social stratificationImpartiality policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:32
朝鮮王朝成立以來,獨佔官學的地位而成為現實的統治理念的朝鮮性理學,經過16世紀的四端七情論爭,突顯其思辨性及心性論的思想特色;17世紀末期,形成了固守及認定程朱系統的性理學之學風;到了18世紀初期,產生了人物性同異論爭。關於人物性同異的具體議論,是從1678年金昌協向他的老師宋時烈提出關於《告子章句》朱子註的問題而開始的。此問題後來引起了1709年栗谷學派權尚夏的門下李東與韓元震之間的異同論辯。除此以外,我們不能忽視人物性同異論之所以發生的時代條件。該論爭產生之際,韓國發生過壬辰倭亂、丁卯胡亂和丙子胡亂等戰亂。朝鮮朝廷經過此三次的戰爭,分成主和派和斥和派,各自主張了不同的政治立場。其中,斥和派站在人物性異論的立場,主張北伐論;主和派根據人物性同論主張北學論。從思想方面來看,此論爭隱含著當時學者們為了突破不能接受的現實問題而不得不選擇的思路。換言之,就當時執政勢力的老論而言,此論爭就是要拒絕丙子胡亂後清朝所要求的君臣關係的一種邏輯根據。進行了大約一百多年的人物性同異論爭,除了學術上的影響以外,還對朝鮮後期的社會產生很深的影響。第一,在此論爭的過程中出現新的社會階層觀,也就是人物性同論派提出的橫向的、平等的身份觀念。第二,此論爭推動了蕩平政治的施行和北學派的出現。第三,在朝鮮的對外關係上,人物性同論更促進了對中國觀的變化。同論派雖然承認華夷之文化差異,但同時把人之本性看成理之普遍性,因此他們強調了人、物性之同質性,在文化上也肯定了清朝文明。
The study of the nature and principle which had been introduced to Korea in the eleventh century developed the theory of mind-nature through the debate of four beginnings and seven feelings in the sixteenth century. It created an academic environment in which scholars only advocated for Cheng Yi and Zhu Xi's thought in the late seventeenth century. By the early eighteenth century, scholars began to debate whether human nature and things nature are same or different. In 1709, Yi Gan and Han Won-jin, who were the students of Kwon Sang-ha, started the debate that human nature and things nature are same or different. Yi Gan argued that the nature of human beings and that of animals were the same but Han Won-j in claimed that they were different. This debate was related to foreign policy in the Choson dynasty at that time. Those who advocated for human nature and things nature same theory supported reconciliation with the Qing dynasty. On the other hand those who advocated for human nature and things nature different theory argued for war with the Qing dynasty. The debate that human nature and things nature are same or different which proceeded around 100 years influenced not only academics but also society in the late Choson dynasty. First, when this debate was unfolding, the idea that people are equal emerged for the first time. Second, this debate contributed to the adoption of impartiality policy and the rise of Northern Korean Learning School. Third, the human nature and things nature same theory brought about changes in the perception on China, which contributed to embrace the culture of Qing dynasty.
期刊論文
1.李明輝(20100600)。臺灣學界關於韓國儒學的研究概況。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊,7(1)=13,259-277。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張淑必(2013)。湖洛論爭以前栗谷學派的未發論與人、物性同異論。栗谷思想研究,26,37-66。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙成山(2000)。18世紀後半洛論系經世思想之心性論的基盤。朝鮮時代史學報,12,69-97。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lee, Daehee(2008)。The New Korean Philosophical Association。Chulhak-Ronchong,54。  new window
圖書
1.楊祖漢(2008)。從當代儒學觀點看韓國儒學的重要論爭。上海:華東師範大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.金昌協(2002)。國譯農巖集。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
3.韓元震(1998)。南塘先生文集。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
4.李柬(1997)。巍巖遺稿。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
5.李珥(1992)。栗谷全書。首爾:成均館大學大同文化研究院。  延伸查詢new window
6.洪大容(1997)。湛軒書。首爾:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
7.文錫胤(2006)。湖洛論爭的形成與展開。首爾:東與西。  延伸查詢new window
8.宋時烈。宋子大全。首爾。  延伸查詢new window
9.任聖周(1999)。鹿門集。韓國:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
10.尹鳳九(199)。屛溪集。韓國:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
11.尹絲淳、高翊晉(1985)。韓國的思想。首爾:Yolumsa。  延伸查詢new window
12.李愛熙(2005)。朝鮮後期人性物性論爭之研究。首爾:高麗大學校民族文化研究院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE