資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.119.206)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
96小時與72小時更換周邊靜脈留置針的效應探討--隨機控制試驗
書刊名:
護理暨健康照護研究
作者:
王維那
/
郭嘉琪
作者(外文):
Wang, Wei-na
/
Kuo, Chia-chi
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
10:3
頁次:
頁190-198
主題關鍵詞:
周邊靜脈留置針
;
靜脈炎
;
注射處感染
;
血流感染
;
成本
;
Peripheral intravenous catheters
;
Phlebitis
;
Injection site infections
;
Bloodstream infections
;
Costs
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:
2
點閱:124
背景:周邊靜脈注射是臨床普遍的處置。雖然美國疾病管制中心指引,建議不須常規三天重置周邊靜脈留置針,但台灣海島型氣候是否可依循指引建議,實需本土性實證研究探討之。目的:探討96小時與72小時更換周邊靜脈留置針的效應,提出更換周邊靜脈留置針最佳時機之實證照護依據。方法:研究採隨機控制試驗(randomized controlled trial),方便取樣南部某醫學中心耳鼻喉科病房手術住院病人,以隨機區集(randomized block)方式將個案分派至96小時與72小時組各71人。以卡方檢定與獨立t檢定比較兩組靜脈炎、注射處感染、血流感染、留置針阻塞之發生率,與衛材成本、護理時數耗用之差異。結果:兩組靜脈炎、注射處感染、血流感染與留置針阻塞之發生率並無顯著差異(p>.05),96小時組顯著減少152.72元/人的醫療衛材成本(p<.0001)與174.23秒/人的護理時數(p<.0001)。結論/實務應用:三班常規評估靜脈注射部位,在無感染症狀的情況下,96小時是較佳的周邊靜脈留置針更換時機。
以文找文
Background: Peripheral intravenous injection is a common clinical procedure. According to U.S. Centers for Disease Control guidelines, there is no need to replace peripheral catheters routinely every three days. However, local evidence‐based research is needed to determine whether these guidelines are appropriate for Taiwan's island climate. Purpose: This study explores the effects of routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters every 96 hours versus every 72 hours, attempting to provide evidence‐based information on optimal timing for replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. Methods: A randomized controlled trial design was adopted. Using convenience sampling, surgical otolaryngology inpatients of a medical center in southern Taiwan were recruited. A randomized block design assigned 71 participants to the 96‐hour group and to the 72‐hour group, respectively. A chi‐square test and independent t test were used to compare the differences in the incidence of phlebitis, injection site infections, bloodstream infections, and catheter occlusion as well as the materials costs and nursing hours per patient day between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of phlebitis, injection site infections, bloodstream infections, or catheter occlusion (p > .05). The 96‐hour group had a significant NT$ 152.72/person reduction in medical material costs (p < .0001) and a significant 174.23 seconds /person reduction in nursing hours per patient day (p < .0001). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The results of this study suggest that for cases in which no infection signs at the intravenous injection sites are detected by routine assessment for more than three shifts during one day, the optimal replacement interval for peripheral intravenous catheters is 96 hours.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Kang, M.、Ragan, B. G.、Park, J. H.(2008)。Issues in outcomes research: An overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials。Journal of Athletic Training,43(2),215-221。
2.
方莉、陳季員、陳彰惠(20091200)。成人周邊靜脈管路引起之靜脈炎相關因素探討--系統性回顧。長庚護理,20(4)=68,463-470。
延伸查詢
3.
Ho, K. H. M.、Cheung, D. S. S.(2012)。Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters。Journal of Clinical Nursing,21(11/12),1499-1506。
4.
Raad, I.、Hanna, H. A.、Awad, A.、Alrahwan, A.、Bivins, C.、Khan, A.、Mansour, G.(2001)。Optimal frequency of changing intravenous administration sets: Is it safe to prolong use beyond 72 hours?。Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology,22(3),136-139。
5.
Rickard, C. M.、McCann, D.、Munnings, J.、McGrail, M. R.(2010)。Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: A randomised controlled trial。BMC Medicine,8(53),1-10。
6.
Rickard, C. M.、Webster, J.、Wallis, M. C.、Marsh, N.、McGrail, M. R.、French, V.、Whitby, M.(2012)。Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomised controlled equivalence trial。The Lancet,380(9847),1066-1074。
7.
Tohid, H.、Sim, N.、Lin, L.(2005)。Extending the use of peripheral intravenous catheter and administration sets from 72 hours to 96 hours。Singapore Nursing Journal,32(2),51-56。
8.
Van Donk, P.、Rickard, C. M.、McGrail, M. R.、Doolan, G.(2009)。Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program: A randomized controlled trial。Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology,30(9),915-917。
9.
Webster, J.、Clarke, S.、Paterson, D.、Hutton, A.、Van Dyk, S.、Gale, C.、Hopkins, T.(2008)。Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: Randomised controlled trial。BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition),337(7662),157-160。
10.
Webster, J.、Lloyd, S.、Hopkins, T.、Osborne, S.、Yaxley, M.(2007)。Developing a research base for intravenous peripheral cannula re-sites (DRIP trial). A randomised controlled trial of hospital in-patients。International Journal of Nursing Studies,44(5),664-671。
11.
Webster, J.、Osborne, S.、Rickard, C.、Hall, J.(2010)。Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters。Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,17(3),1-39。
12.
Yan, N.(2010)。Peripheral intravenous catheter: Phlebitic risks and prevention。Stanford Nurse,30(1),16-17。
其他
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(2011)。Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011,http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/BSI/BSIguidelines-2011.html, 。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
比較內科病人72小時與96小時更換靜脈導管其靜脈炎發生率:前瞻型研究
2.
96小時重置周邊靜脈導管之效應:資料庫分析
3.
降低肝膽腸胃科病房非計畫性週邊靜脈留置針重注率之改善專案
4.
降低兒科病患靜脈注射後靜脈炎的發生率
5.
成人周邊靜脈管路引起之靜脈炎相關因素探討--系統性回顧
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
探討血管閉合裝置對股動脈經皮冠狀動脈介入術止血及預防血管合併症之成效--系統性文獻回顧
2.
比較認知行為治療與行為治療於過重青少年減重之成效探討--文獻統整
3.
血管運動對血液透析病患動靜脈瘻管直徑成效之統合分析
4.
機構老年住民的神經精神症狀對睡眠滿意度的影響之初探
5.
護理系大學生對刮痧療法的知識、態度及行為之探討
6.
團體氣功運動於修正心臟缺血性病變危險因子成效
7.
應用藝術創作改善長照機構老人憂鬱及提升自尊
8.
安寧共同照顧模式對改善癌末主要照顧家屬照顧負荷之成效
9.
系統性文獻回顧方式探討處置介入對前列腺癌病患及其伴侶婚姻調適之成效
10.
雙極症病患接受人際社會節奏治療之成效--系統性文獻回顧
11.
兒時受虐經驗對機構少女罹患愛滋病/性病高風險行為與憂鬱之影響
12.
發展宜蘭高齡友善城市的過程與工作模式
13.
化療引致噁心嘔吐之發生率及其相關因素
14.
照顧管理專員角色功能及照顧管理服務滿意度之相關研究
15.
主要照顧者面對初次化學治療返家之癌症病童居家照護的經驗
QR Code