:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:荀子「制天命」說的形成及思想內蘊
書刊名:先秦兩漢學術
作者:姚彥淇 引用關係
作者(外文):Yau, Yen-chi
出版日期:2010
卷期:14
頁次:頁21-47
主題關鍵詞:荀子命論節遇制天命時命Xun ZiTheory of fateTo master the laws of fateDestiny
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:38
「命」自古以來就是一個來源悠遠且令人感受深刻的概念,荀子既為先秦碩儒之一,對於這個重要的思想命題自然也會有所關注,而「制天命」說即是其命論思想中最具特色的看法。荀子以天生人成的立場強調「命」雖生於天但卻成於人,儘管時命左右了人的際遇窮達,但荀子卻勸君子「博學俟時」,為人成之路找到了一個出口。而透過觀念的追索,我們也發現,除了「俟時」之外其「制天命」思想是循「攝命歸禮」、「以名正命」兩個途徑,以圖恢復「命」在宗教語境中早已失落,卻期望能在人文世界中重建的莊嚴、客觀及權威性。
Since the ancient times, fate has been considered as a distant concept that deeply impresses people. Xun Zi, one of the Confucian apprentices during the Pre-Qin Dynasty, also possessed a nature to focus on significant issues related to Fate. While the ”to Master the Laws of fate” is considered as the most unique perspective in the theory of Fate. Xun Zi emphasized the Fate based on the perspective of natural person born under the sky and hence become a person. Even though the destiny infinitely plays on the man’s fate, Xun Zi suggested that people should keep learning and waiting for the right timing in order to find solutions to solve their problems. Furthermore, through exploration of the concepts, we also found out that aside from waiting for the timing, the God’s Will is also based on the ethics and names that define the fate. The images that recover Fate in the religious environments had faded in the early times. However, people still have the hope to build the world with dignity, objectivity, and authority.
期刊論文
1.蔡錦昌(19881100)。荀韓關係論:評韋政通和蕭公權的看法。思與言,26(4),355-368。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.潘小慧(20081000)。禮義、禮情及禮文--荀子禮論哲學的特點。哲學與文化,35(10)=413,45-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.胡正之(20080400)。「人之命在天」與先秦儒家天命觀辨析。輔仁國文學報,26,99-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李哲賢(20061200)。論荀子約定俗成之制名原則及其衍生之問題。漢學研究集刊,3,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳波(20081100)。荀子的政治化和倫理化的語言哲學--一個系統性的詮釋、建構、比較與評論。臺大文史哲學報,69,99-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.梁啟超(1977)。荀子正名篇。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.牟宗三(1969)。名家與荀子。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳寧(2000)。中國古代命運觀的現代詮釋。遼寧瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.池田知久、曹峰(2006)。池田知久簡帛研究論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.阮元(1955)。十三經注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳鼓應(1995)。黃帝四經今註今譯。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.莊子、郭慶藩、王孝魚(1980)。莊子集釋。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.王國維、彭林(2001)。觀堂集林(外二種)。石家莊:河北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.勞思光(1981)。中國哲學史。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.林玫玲(20070000)。先秦哲學的「命論」思想。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王先謙(1982)。荀子集解。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.張亨(1997)。思文之際論集:儒道思想的現代詮釋。允晨文化實業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐復觀(1969)。中國人性論史:先秦篇。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐復觀(1985)。中國思想史論集續編。時報文化出版事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hall, David L.、Ames, Roger T.、何金俐(2005)。通過孔子而思。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐君毅(1984)。中國哲學原論.導論篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE