:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生課堂不禮貌行為與品德概念關係之研究
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:徐綺穗 引用關係吳佳臻
作者(外文):Hsu, Chi-suiWu, Chia-chen
出版日期:2014
卷期:22:3
頁次:頁131-167
主題關鍵詞:高等教育課堂不禮貌行為品德概念Higher educationClassroom incivilityCharacter concept
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:49
  • 點閱點閱:156
本研究探討大學生對課堂不禮貌行為的知覺與認同,及其與品德概念的關係。在大學生課堂不禮貌行為方面,分為激進型與消極型兩種類型;在品德概念方面,則以尊重、負責、及自律等三個核心價值為主要內涵。研究對象為臺灣之大學生,以六所大學,730名大學生進行調查。研究結果如下:1.大學生知覺消極型課堂不禮貌行為多於激進型課堂不禮貌行為,大學生對課堂不禮貌行為傾向不認同,其中對於激進型行為的不認同更勝於消極型。2.南部大學生較北、中部大學生知覺較多課堂不禮貌行為,其認同度也較低;公立學校大學生對課堂不禮貌行為的認同度低於私立學校大學生;大三學生較大一學生知覺較多課堂不禮貌行為;男、女大學生對課堂不禮貌行為的知覺及認同皆沒有顯著差異。3.大學生在尊重、負責及自律三個分層面的單題得分皆高於平均值。南部大學生品德概念得分高於中、北部大學生;公立學校大學生品德概念得分高於私立學校大學生;男、女不同性別之大學生其品德概念得分無顯著差異。4.大學生對課堂不禮貌行為知覺與其品德概念有顯著正相關,而認同程度則與品德概念呈現負相關。大學生品德整體可以正向預測其對課堂不禮貌行為的知覺;大學生的尊重概念則負向的預測課堂不禮貌行為的認同。
This study explored the perceptions of undergraduate students regarding the frequency and their approval of classroom incivilities, and examined the relation between classroom incivilities (i.e., passive and active incivilities) and character concepts (i.e., respect, responsibility, and self-discipline). The participants comprised 730 undergraduate students from 6 universities in Taiwan. The findings are as follows: (a) The students perceived more passive classroom incivilities compared with active classroom incivilities; they disapproved of all incivilities, but particularly disapproved of active incivilities. (b) The students in Southern Taiwan perceived more uncivil behaviors in class and disapproved of these behaviors more compared with the students in Central and Northern Taiwan, public school students disapproved incivilities more than private school students. Third year students perceived more uncivil behaviors than first year students. No difference occurred in the perceived frequency and approval of classroom incivilities between male and female students. (c) All students attained above average scores regarding the character concepts of respect, responsibility, and self-discipline. Students in Southern Taiwan attained higher scores than students in the Central and Northern Taiwan, public school students higher than private school students, and male and female students exhibited no differences. (d) Student perceptions of classroom incivilities and their frequencies were significantly and positively correlated with student character concepts, but the degree of student approval of classroom incivilities was significantly and negatively coorrelated with these character concepts; thus, student character concepts can predict perceptions of classroom incivilities and the way students conceive respect can negatively predict their approval of classroom incivilities.
期刊論文
1.李奉儒(20120400)。道德意志薄弱及其對於道德教育的啟示。課程與教學,15(2),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Alkandari, N.(2011)。The level of student incivility: The need of a policy to regulate college student civility。College Student Journal,45(2),257-268。  new window
3.Altmiller, G.(2012)。Student perceptions of incivility in nursing education:Implications for educators。Nursing Education Perspectives,33(1),15-20。  new window
4.Appleby, D. C.(1990)。Faculty and student perceptions of irritating behaviors in the college classroom。The Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development,8(1),41-46。  new window
5.Berger, B. A.(2000)。Incivility。American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,64,445-450。  new window
6.Bird, C.(2010)。Self-respect and the respect of others。European Journal of Philosophy,18(1),17-40。  new window
7.Bjorklund, W. L.、Rehling, D. L.(2010)。Student perceptions of classroom incivility。College Teaching,58(1),15-18。  new window
8.Boice, B.(1996)。Classroom incivilities。Research in Higher Education,37,453-486。  new window
9.Carbonne, E.(1999)。Students behaving badly in large classes。New Directions for Teaching and Learning,1999(77),35-43。  new window
10.Duckworth, A. L.、Seligman, M. E. P.(2006)。Self-discipline gines girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achivement test scores。Journal of Education Psychology,98(1),198-208。  new window
11.Feldmann, L. J.(2001)。Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities。College Teaching,49(4),137-140。  new window
12.Gross, E. R.(2011)。Clashing values: Contemporary views about cheating and plagiarism compared to traditonal beliefs and practices。Education,132,435-440。  new window
13.Hirschy, A. S.、Braxton, J. M.(2004)。Effects of student classroom incivilities on students。New Directions for Teaching and Learning,99,67-76。  new window
14.Karris, M. A.、Craighead, W. E.(2012)。Differences in character among U.S. college students。Individual Differences Research,10(2),69-80。  new window
15.Kiracofe, N. M.、Wells, L.(2007)。Mandated disciplinary counseling on campus: Problems and possibilities。Journal of Counseling & Development,85(3),259-268。  new window
16.Logan, D. E.、Kilmer, J. R.、Marlatt, G. A.(2010)。The virtuous drinker: Character virtues as correlates and moderators of college student drinking and consequences。Journal of American College Health,58(4),317-324。  new window
17.Lounsbury, J. W.、Fisher, L. A.、Levy, J. J.、Welsh, D. P.(2009)。An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students。Individual Differences Research,7(1),52-59。  new window
18.Nordstrom, C. R.、Bartels, L. K.、Bucy, J.(2009)。Predicting and curbing classroom incivility in higher education。College Student Journal,43(1),74-85。  new window
19.Paik, C.、Broedel-Zaugg, K.(2006)。Pharmacy students, opinions on civility and preferences regarding professors。American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,70(4),1-9。  new window
20.Patron, H.、Bisping, T. O.(2008)。Why students misbehave in class: An empirical analysis of classroom incivilities。Mountain Plains Journal of Business and Economics,9,61-74。  new window
21.Rogus, J. F.(1985)。Promoting self-discipline:A comprehensive approach。Theory Into Practice,24(4),271-276。  new window
22.Vehmas, S.(2011)。Disability and moral responsibility。TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences,15(2),156-167。  new window
23.Lickona, T.(2003)。The content of our character: Ten essential virtues。The Fourth and Fifth Rs: Respect and Responsibility,10(1),1-3。  new window
24.Berger, E.(1996)。K-12 character education in Locust Valley。The Fourth and Fifth Rs-Respect and Responsibility,2(2),3-4。  new window
25.Rose, C. Merenda、Sharon, White-Williams(2003)。Classroom idea-sparkers。Childhood Education,77,222-227。  new window
26.李琪明(20030800)。德行取向之品德教育理論與實踐。哲學與文化,30(8)=351,153-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.簡成熙(20060400)。品格教育能夠促進公德嗎?。課程與教學,9(2),13-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳慧琪(2011)。探究品德教育融入綜合活動學習領域之行動研究--以「關懷」德目為核心(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hall, A.、Holder, B.、Matthews, E.、McDowell, M.、Pyne, L.(1998)。Character education: Ideas and activities for the classroom。Greensboro, NC:Carson-Dellosa。  new window
2.Lickona, T.(1991)。Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility。New York, NY:Harper & Row:Bantam Books。  new window
3.Ryan, K.、Bohlin, K. E.(1999)。Building character in schools: practical ways to bring moral instruction to life。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
單篇論文
1.Sorcinelli, M. D.(1990)。Dealing with troublesome behaviors in the classroom,Amherst:University of Massachusetts。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE