:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣欒樹引來之椿象對公園不同使用者造成的困擾及其解決方式之影響
書刊名:戶外遊憩研究
作者:蔡宛潔章錦瑜 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Wan-chieChang, Chin-yu
出版日期:2014
卷期:27:2
頁次:頁63-91
主題關鍵詞:混植多樣性厭惡爭議使用意願Mixed plantingDiversityDisgustControversyWillingness to use
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:9
本土且觀賞性高之臺灣欒樹,近年來種植數量頗多,當其周邊聚集大量紅姬緣椿象(簡稱椿象)時,因困擾民眾,以致年年要求移樹之聲不斷,且與另群不贊同者形成爭議。本研究針對台中市栽植臺灣欒樹較多之舊社、潮洋環保以及公2-2公園,就其使用者進行問卷調查,有效問卷回收520份。研究結果發現民眾對椿象的認知普遍不足。且年齡越低者越厭惡,但61歲以上、男性、以及幾乎每日使用公園者多不以為意,也較不會降低使用公園的意願。另外,隨年齡以及來公園頻率遞增,越不希望移植現有樹木,也不希望噴灑藥劑防治,於椿象集聚時,建議清除椿象即可。本研究結果可做為現有臺灣欒樹之處理與管理、以及提供未來為降低椿象群聚之植栽設計之參考。
The golden-rain tree ("Koelreuteria formosana") is a native Taiwanese species with beautiful flowers and fruit that changes seasonally. In an unbalanced ecosystem, there may be a massive gathering of scentless plant bugs (Leptocoris augur) around the trees that causes distress among the park’s visitors. Further, this may lead to visitor demands to remove the trees. A questionnaire was distributed in three neighboring parks in Taichung City. There were 520 valid questionnaires. The results revealed that the majority of the respondents lack sufficient knowledge about scentless plant bugs. Younger respondents expressed higher levels of distress. Older people and daily park visitors were not influenced by the bugs and were not discouraged to revisit the parks even when massive amount of bugs gathered around the trees. They were less likely to agree that the golden-rain tree should be removed. Our findings show that when large amounts of scentless plant bugs appeared, frequent removal of the bugs was the most efficient solution. This research provides park administrators with some potential solutions to dealing with this issue.
期刊論文
1.章錦瑜(20040900)。論臺灣常見行道樹之問題。林業研究季刊,26(3),83-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gidlof-Gunnarsson, A.、Öhrström, E.(2007)。Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas。Landsc Urban Plan,83,115-126。  new window
3.朱耀沂(2010)。地球溫暖化與森林昆蟲。臺灣昆蟲通訊,5,1-2。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳怡欣(2004)。昆蟲狂熱─誰能為生物多樣性代言。臺灣博物,23(4),14-19。  延伸查詢new window
5.Price, W. P.、林政行(19821000)。植物與昆蟲的共同演化。科學農業,30(9/10),395-402。  延伸查詢new window
6.范義彬、楊平世(20050800)。昆蟲在現代林業中之角色與重要性。臺灣林業,31(4),40-46。  延伸查詢new window
7.張台聖(2003)。紅姬緣椿象--行道樹上的狠角色。大地地理雜誌,185,64-75。  延伸查詢new window
8.章錦瑜、陳依苓(20061000)。探討木棉造成之困擾及其解決方式--以臺中縣民眾屬性為例。東海學報,47(農學院),127-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.章錦瑜、陳姿君、陳本睿(20090600)。論掌葉蘋婆。林業研究季刊,31(2),97-106。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉瑩、楊平世、侯豐男、陳家鐘、陳雲貞、曾顯雄(20091200)。害蟲與天敵。科學發展月刊,444,4-40。  延伸查詢new window
11.Davis, R. L.(1993)。Street tree trends in Kansas and the influence of community factors。Journal of Arboriculture,19(4),201-208。  new window
12.DeCandido, R.(2004)。Recent changes in plant species diversity in urban Pelham Bay Park, 1947-1998。Biological Conservation,120,1947-1998。  new window
13.Dwyer, J. F.、McPherson, E. G.、Schroeder, H. W.、Rowntree, R. A.(1992)。Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest。Journal of Arboriculture,18(5),227-234。  new window
14.Dwyer, J. F.、Schroeder, H. W.、Gobster, P. H.(1991)。The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values。Journal of Arboriculture,17(10),276-284。  new window
15.Elmendorf, W.(2008)。The importance of trees and nature in community: A review of the relative literature。Journal of Arboriculture,34(3),152-156。  new window
16.Endress, A. G.(1990)。The importance of diversity in selecting trees for urban areas。Journal of Arboriculture,16(6),143-147。  new window
17.Galvin, M. F.(1999)。A methodology for assessing and managing biodiversity in street tree populations: A case study。Journal of Arboriculture,25(3),124-128。  new window
18.Heimlich, J. E.、Sydnor, T. D.、Bumgardner, M.、O'Brien, P.(2008)。Attitudes of residents toward street trees on four streets in before removal of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) from Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis)。Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,34(1),47-53。  new window
19.Hull, R. B.(1992)。How the public values urban forests。Journal of Arboriculture,18(2),98-101。  new window
20.Kendal, D.、Williams, N. S. G.、Williams, K. J. H.(2012)。Drivers of diversity and tree cover in gardens, parks and streetscapes in an Australian city。Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,11(3),257-265。  new window
21.Kirkpatrick, J. B.、Davison, A.、Daniels, G. D.(2012)。Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities。Landscape and Urban Planning,107(2),147-158。  new window
22.Moskell, C.、Allred, S. B.(2013)。Residents' beliefs about responsibility for the stewardship of park trees and street trees in New York City。Landscape and Urban Planning,120,85-95。  new window
23.Poland, T. M.、McCullough, D. G.(2006)。Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to north America's ash resource。Journal of Forestry,104,118-124。  new window
24.Raupp, M. J.、Shrewsbury, P. M.、Holmes, J. J.、Davidson, J. A.(2001)。Plant species diversity and abundance affects the number of arthropod pests in residential landscapes。Journal of Arboriculture,27(4),222-229。  new window
25.Saebo, A.、Benedika, T.、Randrup, T. B.(2003)。Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries。Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2(2),101-114。  new window
26.Schroeder, H. W.、Cannon, W. N.(1983)。The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio。Journal of Arboriculture,9(9),237-243。  new window
27.Schroeder, H. W.、Flannigan, J.、Coles, R.(2006)。Residents' attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities。Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,32(5),236-246。  new window
28.Sjöman, H.、Gunnarsson, A.、Pauleit, S.、Bothmer, R.(2012)。Selection approach of urban trees for inner-city environments: Learning from nature。Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,38(5),194-204。  new window
29.Sommer, R.、Cecchettini, C. L.(1992)。Street tree location and sidewalk management preference of urban householders。Journal of Arboriculture,18(4),188-191。  new window
30.Sommer, R.、Barker, P. A.、Guenther, H.、Kurani, K.(1989)。Householder evaluation of two street tree species。Journal of Arboriculture,15(4),99-102。  new window
31.Sommer, R.、Cecchettini, C. L.、Guenther, H.(1992)。Agreement among arborists, gardeners, and landscape architects in rating street trees。Journal of Arboriculture,18(5),252-256。  new window
32.Sommer, R.、Learey, F.、Summit, J.、Tirrell, M.(1994)。The social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting。Journal of Arboriculture,20(3),170-175。  new window
33.Spellerberg, I. F.、Eriksson, N. E.、Crump, V. S. A.(2006)。Silver Birch (Betula pendula) pollen and human health: Problems for an exotic tree in New Zealand。Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,32(4),133-137。  new window
34.Sperry, C. E.、Chaney, W. R.、Shao, G.、Sadof, C. S.(2001)。Effects of tree density, tree species diversity, and percentage of hardscape on three insect pests of honeylocust。Journal of Arboriculture,27(5),263-271。  new window
35.Stevenson, T. R.、Gerhold, H. D.、Elmendorf, W. F.(2008)。Attitudes of municipal officials toward street tree programs in Pennsylvania。U.S. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,34(3),144-151。  new window
36.Subburayalu, S.、Sydnor, T. D.(2012)。Assessing street tree diversity in four Ohio communities using the weighted Simpson index。Landscape and Urban Planning,106(1),44-50。  new window
37.Tello, M. L.、Redondo, C.、Mateo-Sagasta, E.(2000)。Health status of plane trees (Platanus spp.) in Spain。Journal of Arboriculture,26(5),246-254。  new window
38.Ware, G. H.(1994)。Ecological basis for selecting urban trees。Journal of Arboriculture,20(2),98-103。  new window
39.Weidhaas, J. A.(1981)。The problem with insects is people。Journal of Arboriculture,7(5),117-122。  new window
40.Williams, K.(2002)。Exploring resident preferences for street trees in Melbourne, Australia。Journal of Arboriculture,28(4),161-170。  new window
41.Young, R. F.(2011)。Planting the living city。Journal of the American Planning Association,77(4),368-381。  new window
42.Zhang, Y.、Hussain, A.、Deng, J.、Letson, N.(2007)。Public attitudes toward urban trees and supporting urban tree programs。Environment and Behaviour,39,797-814。  new window
43.Obua, J.、Harding, D. M.(1996)。Visitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda。Tourism Management,17(7),495-505。  new window
44.章錦瑜(20050600)。論臺灣常見行道樹之問題。林業研究季刊,27(2),77-89。  延伸查詢new window
45.Schroeder, Herbert W.、Ruffolo, Steven R.(1996)。Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb。Journal of Arboriculture,22(1),35-43。  new window
46.Gorman, James(2004)。Residents' opinions on the value of street trees depending on tree location。Journ. of Arbor.,30(1),36-44。  new window
47.Lohr, Virginia I.、Pearson-Mims, Caroline H.、Tarnai, John、Dillman, Don A.(2004)。How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities。Journal of Arboriculture,30(1),28-35。  new window
48.Smardon, R. C.(1988)。Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation。Landscape and Urban Planning,15(1/2),85-106。  new window
49.章錦瑜(20090600)。論臺灣常見之爭議性行道樹。造園景觀學報,15(1),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.James, M. B.(1985)。Tree problems in Ireland。Journal of Arboriculture,11(4),122-124。  new window
51.Kuo, F. E.(2001)。Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city。Environment and Behavior,33(1),5-34。  new window
學位論文
1.陳姿君(2009)。掌葉蘋婆對台中市居民造成之困擾與影響(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹典穎(2008)。都市內高齡者公園休閒活動參與特性之研究--以台南市為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉芳吟(2003)。行道樹缺點對民眾影響之研究--以台中市黑板樹為例(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.高雄市政府工務局(2008)。臺灣欒樹秋天展風華,http://www.unju.com.tw/03_news/03_news_02_detail.php?mid=1&mid1=928&P=68&zno=193, 2014/06/03。  new window
2.國立自然科學博物館(2013)。昆蟲取食行為(2013/09/12)。,http://web2.nmns.edu.tw/PubLib/NewsLetter/87/132/09.html, 2013/09/12。  new window
3.章加寶(1997)。天敵昆蟲和生態保育,http://mdares.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=1077, 2013/09/12。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處(2013)。四季風情畫-臺灣欒樹,http://www.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34836737&ctNode=8957&mp=106011, 2013/09/12。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭文正(20000106)。路樹佈滿紅椿象。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林秋芸、凌德麟(1998)。社區鄰里公園老年人休閒活動設施之調查。休閒理論與遊憩行為。臺北:田園城市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ducatillion, C.、Dubois, E.(1997)。Diversification des plantes ornementales mediterraneennes: Estimation des besoins qualitatifs des villes en arbres et arbustes (Diversification of ornamental Mediterranean plants: Assessment of the qualitative needs of cities concerning trees and shrubs)。La plante dans la ville, Angers。Paris:INRA。  new window
3.Lohr, V. I.、Pearson-Mims. C. H.(2002)。Childhood contact with nature influences adult attitudes and actions towards trees and gardening. Interaction by design: Bringing people and plants together for health and well-being: An international symposium。Interaction by design: Bringing people and plants together for health and well-being: An international symposium。Ames, IA:Iowa State Press。  new window
4.Stiegler, J. H.(1990)。Public perceptions of the urban forest. Make our cities safe for trees。Make our cities safe for trees: Proceedings of the 4th urban forestry conference。Washington, DC:American Forestry Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE