臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：詐欺市場理論中之效率市場及價格衝擊
書刊名：法令月刊
作者：黃朝琮
作者(外文)：Huang, Chao-tsung
出版日期：2014
卷期：65:11
頁次：頁92-122
主題關鍵詞：詐欺市場理論；交易因果關係；行為財學；價格衝擊；效率市場假說；Fraud-on-the-market theory；Transaction causation；Behavioral finance；Price impact；Efficient market hypothesis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:152
  • 點閱點閱:14
期刊論文
1.葉新民(20091200)。論資本市場上因不實資訊而致投資人損害的賠償方法--以德國法為中心。中原財經法學，23，107-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.莊永丞(20110400)。由美國Dura v. Broudo案反思證券投資人之損害因果關係。東吳法律學報，22(4)，99-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Malkiel, Burton G.(2003)。The efficient market hypothesis and its critics。Journal of Economic Perspectives，17(1)，59-82。  new window
4.張心悌(2007)。證券詐欺之因果關係與損害賠償--板橋地方法院九六年金字第二號民事判決評釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌，101，251-258。  延伸查詢new window
5.邵慶平(2006)。證券訴訟上「交易因果關係」與「損害因果關係」之認定--評析高雄地院九一年重訴字第四四七號判決。臺灣本土法學雜誌，79，47-66。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bhagat, Sanjai、Romano, Roberta(2002)。Event Studies and the Law: Part II: Empirical Studies of Corporate Law。American Law and Economics Review，4(2)，380-423。  new window
7.周賓凰、池祥萱、周冠男、龔怡霖(2002)。行為財務學--文獻回顧與展望。證券市場發展季刊，14(2)=54，1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳俊仁(20091200)。論Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo：美國證券詐欺因果關係要件之再建構與對我國證券交易法制之啟示。歐美研究，39(4)，713-767。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Black, Barbara(2013)。Behavioral Economics and Investor Protection: Reasonable Investors, Efficient Markets。Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal，44，1493-1508。  new window
10.Cox, James D.(2013)。Understanding Causation in Private Securities Lawsuits: Building on Amgen。Vanderbilt Law Review，66(6)，1719-1753。  new window
11.Fisch, Jill E.(2013)。The Trouble with Basic: Price Distortion after Halliburton。Washington University Law Review，90(3)，895-932。  new window
12.Langevoort, Donald C.(2009)。Basic at Twenty: Rethinking Fraud-on-the-Market。Wisconsin Law Review，2009(2)，151-198。  new window
13.Mahoney, Paul G.(1992)。Precaution Costs and the Law of Fraud in Impersonal Markets。Virginia Law Review，78(3)，623-670。  new window
14.黃朝琮(20130500)。美國案例中詐欺市場理論之脈絡與發展--從Basic到Amgen。證券暨期貨月刊，31(5)，29-48。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃鈵淳(20090400)。詐欺市場理論於證券求償訴訟之應用--效率資本市場假說與損失因果關係之迷思。全國律師，13(4)，40-65。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉連煜(19950300)。論證券交易法一般反詐欺條款之因果關係問題。律師通訊，186，35-42。  延伸查詢new window
17.戴銘昇(20110300)。證券詐欺之交易因果關係。華岡法粹，49，133-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Adams, Edward S.、Runkle, David E.(1997)。Solving a profound flaw in fraud-on-the-market theory: Utilizing a derivative of arbitrage pricing theory to measure rule 10b-5 damages。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，145(5)，1097-1146。  new window
19.Bebchuk, Lucian A.、Ferrell, Allen(2014)。Rethinking basic。The Business Lawyer，69(3)，671-697。  new window
20.Cox, James D.(2013)。Fraud on the market after Amgen。Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy，9(1)，1-30。  new window
21.Dunbar, Frederick C.、Heller, Dana(2006)。Fraud on the market meets behavioral finance。The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，31(2)，455-532。  new window
22.Fisch, Jill E.(2009)。Cause for concern: Causation and federal securities fraud。Iowa Law Review，94(3)，811-872。  new window
23.Fischel, Daniel R.(1989)。Efficient capital markets the crash and the fraud on the market theory。Cornell Law Review，74，907-922。  new window
24.Fisher, William O.(2005)。Does the efficient market theory help us do justice in a time of madness?。Emory Law Journal，54(2)，843-978。  new window
25.Fox, Merritt B.(2006)。After dura: Causation in fraud-on-the-market actions。Journal of Corporation Law，31(3)，829-875。  new window
26.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier H.(1984)。The mechanisms of market efficiency。Virginia Law Review，70(4)，549-644。  new window
27.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier H.(2003)。The mechanisms of market efficiency twenty years later: The hindsight bias。Journal of Corporation Law，28(4)，715-742。  new window
28.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier H.(2014)。Market efficiency after the financial crisis: It's still a matter of information costs。Virginia Law Review，100(2)，313-375。  new window
29.Goldberg, John C. P.、Zipursky, Benjamin C.(2013)。The fraud-on-the-market tort。Vanderbilt Law Review，66(6)，1755-1805。  new window
30.Grundfest, Joseph A.(2014)。Damages and reliance under section 10(b) of the exchange act。The Business Lawyer，69(2)，307-392。  new window
31.Hartzmark, Michael、Schipani, Cindy A.、Seyhun, H. Nejat(2011)。Fraud on the market: Analysis of the efficiency of the corporate bond market。Columbia Business Law Review，2011(3)，654-716。  new window
32.Hirshleifer, David(2001)。Investor psychology and asset pricing。The Journal of Finance，56(4)，1533-1597。  new window
33.Hu, Henry T. C.(2012)。Efficient markets and the law: A predictable past and an uncertain future。Annual review of financial economics，4，179-214。  new window
34.Langevoort, Donald C.(1992)。Theories, assumptions and securities regulation: Market efficiency revisited。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，140，851-920。  new window
35.Langevoort, Donald C.(2002)。Taming the animal spirits of the stock markets: A behavioral approach to securities regulation。Northwestern University Law Review，97，135-188。  new window
36.Loss, Louis(1992)。The assault on securities act section 12(2)。Harvard Law Review，105(4)，908-917。  new window
37.Macey, Jonathan R.(1989)。The fraud on the market theory: Some preliminary issues。Cornell Law Review，74，923-926。  new window
38.Macey, Jonathan R.、Miller, Geoffrey P.(1989)。Good finance, bad economics: an analysis of the fraud-on-the-market theory。Stanford Law Review，42，1059-1092。  new window
39.Macey, Jonathan R.、Miller, Geoffrey P.、Mitchell, Mark L.、Netter, Jeffry M.(1991)。Lessons from Financial Economics: Materiality, Reliance, and Extending the Reach of Basic v. Levinson。Virginia Law Review，77(5)，1017-1049。  new window
40.Nagareda, Richard A.(2009)。Class certification in the age of aggregate proof。New York University Law Review，84(1)，97-173。  new window
41.Rapp, Geoffrey Christopher(2002)。Proving markets inefficient: The variability of federal court decisions on market efficiency in cammer v. bloom and its progeny。University of Miami Business Law Review，10，303-328。  new window
42.Stout, Lynn A.(1995)。Are stock markets costly casinos? Disagreement, market failure, and securities regulation。Virginia Law Review，81(3)，611-712。  new window
43.Stout, Lynn A.(2003)。The mechanisms of market inefficiency: An Introduction to the new finance。The Journal of Corporation Law，28，635-669。  new window
44.Torchio, Frank(2009)。Proper event study analysis in securities litigation。Journal of Corporation Law，35(1)，159-168。  new window
45.莊永丞(20020600)。論證券交易法第二十條證券詐欺損害賠償責任之因果關係。中原財經法學，8，147-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.Fama, Eugene F.(1998)。Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral Finance。Journal of Financial Economics，49(3)，283-306。  new window
47.謝明瑞(20070700)。行為經濟學理論的探討。商學學報. 空大，15，253-298。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Fama, Eugene F.(1970)。Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work。The Journal of Finance，25(2)，383-417。  new window
研究報告
1.Korsmo, Charles(2014)。Market Efficiency and Fraud on the Market: The Promise and Peril of Halliburton。  new window
2.Yadav, Yesha(2014)。Beyond Efficiency in Securities Regulation。  new window
圖書
1.賴英照(2009)。股市遊戲規則：最新證券交易法解析。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shleifer, Andrei(2002)。Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.曾宛如(2012)。證券交易法原理。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2014)。After The Fraud on the Market Doctrine: What Should Replace It?，http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2014/01/21/after-the-fraud-on-the-market-doctrine-what-should-replace-it/， 2014/06/30。  new window
2.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2014)。Death by One Thousand Cuts，http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2014/06/30/death-by-one-thousand-cuts/， 2014/06/30。  new window
3.Comolli, Renzo，Starykh, Svetlana(20140121)。Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2013 Full-Year Review，http://www.nera.com/publications/archive/2014/recent-trends-in-securities-class-action-litigation-2013-fully.html， 2014/03/16。  new window
4.Cox, James D.(2014)。The Mist of Halliburton II，http://clsbluesky.law.Columbia.edu/2014/06/30/the-mist-of-halliburton-ii/， 2014/06/30。  new window
5.Fox, Merritt B.(2014)。Halliburton II: Who Won and Who Lost All Depends on What Defendants Need to Show to Establish No Impact on Price，http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2014/06/30/halliburton-ii-who-won-and-who-lost-all-depends-on-what-defendants-need-to-show-to-establish-no-impact-on-price/， 2014/06/30。  new window
6.Kaufman, Edward E. Jr.，Levin, Carl M.(20110505)。How to prevent the next flash crash。  new window
7.LaCroix, Kevin(2014)。Halliburton: U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Overturn Basic, Allows Defendants to Rebut Presumption of Reliance，http://www.dandodiary.com/2014/06/articles/securities-litigation/halliburton-u-s-supreme-court-declines-to-overturn-basic-allows-defendants-to-rebut-presumption-of-reliance/， 2014/06/30。  new window
8.Langevoort, Donald C.(2014)。Judgment Day for Fraud-on-the-Market?: Reflections on Amgen and the Second Coming of Halliburton，http://ssrn.com/abstract=2475036， 2014/10/05。  new window
9.Lipton, Ann M.(2014)。Halliburton II: An Unexpected Gift to Plaintiffs，http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/business_law/2014/06/halliburton-ii-an-unexpected-gift-to-plaintiffs.html， 2014/06/30。  new window
10.Shiller, Robert J.(20131027)。We'll share the honors, and agree to disagree。  new window
圖書論文
1.張心悌(2009)。論證券詐欺之損失因果關係--以美國最高法院Dura案為出發。企業與金融法制--余雪明大法官榮退論文集。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖大穎、陳啟垂(2009)。論不實企業資訊之損害賠償與因果關係的舉證責任分配--評述「詐欺市場理論」在實務上的適用。企業與金融法制--余雪明大法官榮退論文集。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾宛如(2008)。論證券交易法第二十條及第二十條之一之民事責任--以主觀要件與信賴為核心。公司管理與資本市場法制專論。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：430（臺灣：425，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67639450
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上