:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:元文人畫與模糊美學
書刊名:嘉南學報. 人文類
作者:陳昭昭方中士
作者(外文):Chen, Chao ChaoFung, Chung Shis
出版日期:2013
卷期:39
頁次:頁270-283
主題關鍵詞:模糊美學文人畫趙孟頫元四大家Fuzzy estheticsThe scholar paintingZhao Meng-FuFour masters of traditional Chinese painting in the Yuan dynasty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:130
  • 點閱點閱:80
詩、書、畫集於一體的元代文人畫,在中國畫史上深具獨特人文氣習。而「糢糊美學」是 一項多元繁雜之美學理論,該理論與元代漢、蒙文化交流之繁複性,以及當時文人之思想意識之 矛盾性、衝擊性等,多有所交集。元代文人畫突破傳統窠臼,畫作之互滲交融與變形創新,與模 糊美學之中介三階段相關。而畫作透過筆墨游移所產生的生動墨趣,或寫愁或寄恨或狂怪或野 逸,亦不具精確性。另在主體意識與畫作對象之間,彼此超越對立,在意象中呈顯出畫中的「視 覺模糊」、「描繪模糊」、「空間模糊」等三層次,以及迷離有序的「過渡模糊」、強化山水生命之 肌理「點綴模糊」等模糊美學特質。故今嘗試以糢糊美學原理,探索元趙孟頫以及黃公望、王蒙、 倪瓚、吳鎮四大家之代表性畫作,所顯現之模糊美感。
The scholar painting in the Yuan Dynasty was combined with classical poetries, penmanship and paintings. It possessed the distinguishing characteristics of the scholar works on the history of Chinese painting. Fuzzy esthetics was an esthetics theory of diversification and complexity. Fuzzy esthetics had the genius about the culture was mixed Han and Mongol, also very complicated, including contradictions and conflict of scholars’ ideology in the Yuan dynasty. The scholar painting in the Yuan dynasty broke with tradition; the draws indicated the originality and blend. Those related to three stages of the intermediary about Fuzzy Esthetics. The ink painting caused the relish vivid images of diffusion. They had not precision, no matter what pent-up feelings of sorrow, fervent hatred, monomania and leisure. Besides the painters could be surmounted contraries between their modernization and paintings, the imagines presented three planes, including vision fuzzy, drawing fuzzy, space fuzzy and so on. And also transit fuzzy, chaotic but well-organized; digital pressing fuzzy, such intensified the texture of landscape paintings, etc. They were all the similar traits of fuzzy esthetics. So, I would try to research on the theory of fuzzy esthetics and the representative paintings also presented the same characteristics. The main painters were Zhao Meng-Fu, and four great masters of traditional Chinese painting in the Yuan dynasty, they were Huang Gong-Wang, Wang Meng, Ni Zan and Wu Zhen. Their works were mixed up in the fuzzy image.
期刊論文
1.張晶(2004)。墨戲:中國繪畫美學的重要範疇。中國書畫,11,25-26。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊福生(200404)。模糊學與模糊美學的現狀與未來。學術界,83,239-246。  延伸查詢new window
3.王頲、李曉娟(2003)。倪瓚生卒時間及晚年行蹤考辨。東南文化,173,72-77。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂少卿(2005)。倪瓚逸民遺民心態變化論。江蘇教育學院學報(社會科學版),21(4),98-100。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡和平(200503)。模糊詩學的命題及其學術語境。十堰職業技術學院學報,18(1),44-47。  延伸查詢new window
6.韋忠才(2001)。論模糊美及其中介。貴州教育學院學報(社會科學版),2001(6),91-102。  延伸查詢new window
7.范英豪、朱志榮(2004)。王明居模糊美學思想述評。學術界,83,247-253。  延伸查詢new window
8.張沖、杜海軍(2005)。黃公望山水畫的藝術特色。焦作大學學報,1,104-105。  延伸查詢new window
9.王明居(200404)。走向二十一世紀的美學--模糊美學研究。學術界,83,98-114。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中國畫論類編編纂小組(1973)。中國畫論類編。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李澤厚(2000)。華夏美學。桂林:廣西師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳長鳴(1998)。倪瓚研究。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐一軒、孫信一(1997)。怎樣畫淺絳山水。上海:上海書畫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.國立故宮博物院(1976)。元四大家。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
6.瑪振凱(1988)。中國的繪畫。臺北:藝術圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊仁愷(1994)。中國書畫。上海:上海古籍版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔣勳(1987)。美的沈思:中國藝術思想芻論。臺北:雄獅圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔣勳(1991)。中國美術史。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.王明居(1992)。模糊藝術論。合肥:安徽教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.倪瓚、曹培廉(1970)。清閟閣全集。臺北:國立中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.張喬(1998)。模糊語義學。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.胡和平(2005)。模糊詩學。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.俞劍華(1998)。中國古代畫論類編。人民美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.林文欽(2003)。文學美學研究資料選集。高雄:春暉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.李霖燦(2005)。中國美術史稿。臺北:雄獅圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.葛路(1978)。中國古代繪畫理論發展史。臺北:丹青圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.伍鐵平(1999)。模糊語言學。上海:上海外語教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE