:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:二十一世紀的臺美關係
書刊名:臺灣國際研究季刊
作者:張旭成
作者(外文):Chang, Parris H.
出版日期:2013
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁27-48
主題關鍵詞:經濟決定論操作中國牌負責任國際利害關係人核心利益重返亞太新型大國關係Economic determinismPlay China cardA responsible international stakeholderCore interestsPivot to Asia-PacificA new type of major power relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:60
本文重點在分析2000-13的美國對華政策,但也就上世紀國際權 力架構與分配,國際大局的演變,和主政政黨與領導人的異動如何影 響美國的亞太和中國政策加以研析。美國是亦民主國家,重視推動人 權和民主化,外交在某種程度也是「內政的延長」,受到國會,企業界學界和民間輿論的影響,這些都是需要納入考慮的變數。 1949年共產黨在中國奪權後,美中雙方缺少互信,有競爭也有對 抗。基本上,美國對華政策必須因應國際社會的變化,尤其是中國崛起及其稱霸的意圖及政策。歐巴馬政府從2010年後執行「重返亞太」 策略但多次強調不是針對中國,但北京確認為此一策略是對付中國,要圍堵和弱化中國。解放軍多年來發展和部署「反介入」(與「區域 拒止」戰力對抗和遏止美國重返亞太。美國如何評估中國的威脅及聯合友邦抗拒中國霸權主義行徑,以 維護國家利益,國際和平和盟友的安全?未來,習近平和其他中國領導人,包括解放軍將領,如何追求「大國夢」和「新型大國關係」, 與美國分庭抗禮將界定美中關係和美國對華政策。近年解放軍主導對 美國大規模的網路攻擊,滲透美國企業,竊取政府,國防和商業情報, 美中已經以另一種形式方式開戰,即所謂「資訊或信息戰爭」。
This article seeks to explain the making of U.S. policy in the 21st century, especially during 2000-2013. It also analyzes how changes in the nternational system and the balance of world power, as well as changes of U.S. leaders, shape American foreign policy toward China and Asia-Pacific. Unlike other major powers, American foreign policy places exceptional emphasis on human rights and the promotion of democracy. As the U.S. polity is pluralistic and democratic, the Congress, civic groups and media participate in the deliberation of its foreign policy and help shape the policy output. Whereas the economic considerations are an important policy ingrediant, the article cautions against the Marxist fallacy of “economic determinism.” Likewise, moralism(e.g. concerns for human rights) or idealism alone does not dictate U.S. policy, as policy leaders are sufficiently realistic and pragmatic to take into account many other important factors. Basically, American China policy in the 21st century is a response to China's economic and military rise. For more than a decade, China has substantially modernized and expanded its military forces and has broadened claims on its “core interests.” Beijing’s quest for domination and hegemony in Asdia-Pacific and the South China Sea has compelled the Obama administation to forge the “pivot to Asia” strategy, which is rebalancing U.S. military forces in the region and strengthening alliances with Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Vietnam, and providing defensive arms to Taiwan. Meanwhile, Chinese new leader Xi Jinping is calling for a new type of major power relationship, namely a parity between the world's two superpowers. In essence, Beijing is challenging the Pax Americana and intends to remake the international order in Asia-Pacific, which is to be ruled jointly by China and the U.S.
期刊論文
1.張旭成(2011)。台灣外交再出發。新世紀智庫論壇,55,6-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chang, Parris H.(2000)。Lessons from the 1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis for the U.S., Japan, and Taiwan。Harvard Studies on Taiwan: Papers of the Taiwan Studies Workshop,3,23-36。  new window
3.Nathan, Andrew J.(2000)。What's Wrong with American Taiwan Policy。The Washington Quarterly,23(2),93-106。  new window
圖書
1.Bader, Jeffrey A.(2012)。Obama and China's Rise。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
2.卜睿哲、林添貴(2010)。臺灣的未來:如何解開兩岸的爭端。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.池田維、楊明珠、黃菁菁(2010)。台灣出使記:日本、台灣、中國挑戰建 立新關係。台北:允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.張旭成、拉沙特、沈玉慧(1995)。如果中共跨過台灣海峽--國際間如何反應。台北:允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.張炎憲、陳世宏(2013)。台灣主權與攻勢外交。台北:吳三連台灣史料基金會。  延伸查詢new window
6.張炎憲、陳美容(2012)。羅福全與台日外交。台北:吳三連台灣史料基金會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jacoby, Neil H.(1966)。Evaluation of U.S. Ecommic Aid to Taiwan。New York:Frederick Prasger。  new window
8.Kierrman, Frank Jr.(1954)。The Fluke That Saved Formosa: A Footnote to History。Cambridge, Mass.:Center for International Studies, MIT。  new window
9.Mann, James(2012)。The Obamians: The Struggle inside the White House to Redefine American Po'wer。New York, Viking。  new window
10.Suettinger, Robert L.(2003)。Beyond Tiarnanmen: The Politics of U.S.-China Relations, 1989-2000。Washington, D.C:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
11.Triplett, William C. II、Edward, Timperlake(1998)。Year of the Rat: How Bill Clinton Compromised U.S. Security for Chinese Cash。Washington, D.C.:Regnery Publishers。  new window
12.Lee, Tawei David(2000)。The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act: Twenty Years in Retrospect。Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Chang, Parris H.、Lasater, Martin L.(1993)。If China Crosses the Taiwan Strait: The International Response。Lanham, Maryland:University Press of American。  new window
14.施正峰(2011)。台灣涉外關係。台北:台灣國際研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
15.張炎憲、陳世宏(2011)。吳釗燮與外交突圍。台北:吳三連台灣史料基金會。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.呂秀蓮(1979)。台灣的過去與未來。台北:拓荒者。  延伸查詢new window
17.Mann, James(1999)。About Face: A History of America's Curious Relationship with China, from Nixon to Clinton。New York:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
18.Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf(2009)。Strait Talk: United States-Taiwan Relations and the Crisis with China。Cambridge。  new window
19.Bush, Richard C.(2005)。Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
20.Mendel, Douglas(1970)。The Politics of Formosan Nationalism。University of California Press。  new window
21.李登輝(19990000)。臺灣的主張。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Tsou, Tang(1963)。America's Failure in China, 1941-1950。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。美:亞太再平衡戰略台有其角色,http://news.chinatimes.com/politics/50207577/112013030100135.html, 2013/05/16。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20130313)。美台商會:台灣明夏應入TPP。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nat, Bellocchi(20130306)。A Focus on Defense A must for the Nation。  new window
4.Gellman, Barton(19980622)。Reappraisal Led to New China Policy: Skeptics Abound, but U.S. 'Strategic Partnership' Yielding Results。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chang, Parris H.(1999)。Lessons from Twenty Years of the Taiwan Relations Act。TRA: The First 20 Years--A Critical Review of the Taiwan relations Act。Taipei:Central News Agency。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE