:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世代規模、教育制度變革與教育機會競爭激烈性
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:黃美玲謝雨生
作者(外文):Huang, Mei-lingHsieh, Yeu-sheng
出版日期:2014
卷期:49
頁次:頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:世代規模教育制度變革教育進階教育機會競爭激烈性Cohort sizeEducational reformEducational progression processThe competition of educational opportunity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:299
臺灣的教育機會競爭激烈性與教育世代的出生規模有關嗎?其關係是否與教育制度變革有所關聯呢?為了回答這兩個研究問題,本研究探討臺灣1940-1992年間,同一年出生者(即同一個出生世代)在教育歷程中的教育機會競爭激烈性之變化,並分析出生世代規模對其不同教育進階的教育機會競爭激烈性之影響。同時,探究出生世代規模對其教育機會競爭激烈性的影響,如何因不同的教育制度變革而變化。分析資料為1940-1992年共53個單年出生世代的世代規模,以及其三個教育進階(國初中進階、高中進階和大專進階)的教育機會競爭激烈性和世代所經歷的教育制度變革等變項。以多層次成長曲線模型分析每個出生世代在不同教育進階的教育機會競爭激烈性。分析結果顯示:同時考慮世代規模與教育制度變革對教育機會競爭激烈性的影響時,世代規模對於國(初)中進階教育競爭激烈性為負向的影響,對於高中進階教育競爭激烈性沒有影響,然而,世代規模愈大,則其大專進階教育競爭激烈性愈高。另外,出生世代規模對其各教育進階教育機會競爭激烈性的影響效應,的確因出生世代所經歷的教育制度變革而有所不同。換言之,臺灣教育制度變革的確調節了出生世代規模,對於教育機會競爭激烈性的影響效應。
This paper explores the trend of educational opportunity competition at different educational levels over different birth cohorts, examines the effect of cohort size on the competition for educational opportunity at different educational level, and tests whether the effect of cohort size on competition for educational opportunity differs by educational reform stages. With data from Education Statistics of the Republic of China, 1958-2010, a multilevel growth curve analysis is employed to analyze the relationships between birth cohort size and competition for educational opportunity at different educational levels, and to assess whether its relationship changes across educational reform stages. The results reveal that birth cohort size has a negative effect on the competition for educational opportunity at the junior high school level, no significant effect at the senior high school level, and a positive effect at the college level when holding the effect of educational reform constant. Moreover, the effect of birth cohort size on the competition for educational opportunity differs by the stage for educational reform. In other words, educational reform does moderate the magnitude of the effect of cohort size on the competition for educational opportunity.
期刊論文
1.簡成熙(19991100)。我國升學競爭的機制與變革:以近年來高中入學制度為例。教育研究資訊,7(6),61-84+a8。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ahlburg, D.、Crimmins, E. M.、Easterlin, R. A.(1981)。The Outlook for Higher Education: A Cohort Size Model of Enrollment of the College Age Population, 1948-2000。Review of Public Data Use,9(3),211-227。  new window
3.Bound, J.、Hershbein, B.、Long, B. T.(2009)。Playing the Admissions Game: Student Reactions to Increasing College Competition。Journal of Economic Perspectives,23(4),119-146。  new window
4.Bound, John、Turner, Sarah(2007)。Cohort Crowding: How Resources Affect Collegiate Attainment。Journal of Public Economics,91(5/6),877-899。  new window
5.Bradley, S.、Johnes, G.、Millington, J.(2001)。The Effect of Competition on the Efficiency of Secondary Schools in England。European Journal of Operational Research,135(3),545-568。  new window
6.Freeman, R. B.(1979)。The Effect of Demographic Factors on Age-Earnings Profiles。Journal of Human Resources,14(3),289-318。  new window
7.Lam, D.、Marteleto, L.(2008)。Stages of the Demographic Transition from a Child's Perspective: Family Size, Cohort Size, and Children's Resources。Population and Development Review,34(2),225-252。  new window
8.Premfors, R.(1980)。How Much Higher Education Is Enough? A Comparison of Public Policy in France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom。Comparative Education Review,24(3),302-322。  new window
9.Saavedra, J. E.(2012)。Resource Constraints and Educational Attainment in Developing Countries: Colombia 1945-2005。Journal of Development Economics,99(1),80-91。  new window
10.Stapleton, D. C.、Young, D. J.(1988)。Educational Attainment and Cohort Size。Journal of Labor Economics,6(3),330-361。  new window
11.洪仁進、簡成熙、徐振邦、朱盈潔(19991100)。臺灣升學機制及升學競爭之簡介。教育研究資訊,7(6),1-20+a5。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Belfield, C. R.、Levin, H. M.(2002)。The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States。Review of Educational Research,72(2),279-341。  new window
13.Ryder, N. B.(1965)。The Cohort As A Concept in the Study of Social Change。American Sociological Review,30(6),843-861。  new window
14.Mare, Robert D.(1980)。Social Background and School Continuation Decisions。Journal of the American Statistical Association,75(370),295-305。  new window
15.Peters, H. Elizabeth、Pampel, Fred C.(1995)。The Easterlin Effect。Annual Review of Sociology,21,163-194。  new window
16.Welch, Finis(1979)。Effects of Cohort Size on Earnings: The Baby Boom Babies' Financial Bust。Journal of Political Economy,87(5, part 2),S65-S97。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡侑達(2011)。計劃與管制:一個台灣升學主義的經濟學分析(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃春木(2008)。台灣社會升學主義的發展與解決對策(1945-2007)(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部教育年鑑編纂委員會(1987)。第五次中華民國教育年鑑。台北市:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣省政府教育廳(1987)。臺灣教育發展史料彙編:國民教育篇。臺中:臺灣省立臺中圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃武雄(1995)。臺灣教育的重建。臺北:遠流出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Easterlin, Richard A.(1987)。Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.教育部統計處(2011)。歷年校數、教師、職員、班級、學生及畢業生數,https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/seriesdata.xls, 2011/10/03。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.薛承泰(2005)。台灣近五十年的人口變遷與教育發展:兼論教改的方向。二十一世紀大學教育的新挑戰。台北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱敬一、葉家興(1994)。臺灣的「私人興學」現況檢討與政策建議。臺灣的教育改革。臺北市:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張清溪(1994)。教育與人力規劃。台灣的教育改革。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.謝雨生、黃美玲(20120000)。家庭社會階級對子女教育進階的影響及變遷。臺灣的社會變遷 1985-2005:社會階層與勞動市場。臺北:中央研究院社會研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Jones, G. W.(1971)。Effect of Population Change on the Attainment of Educational Goals in the Developing Countries。Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
6.Schultz, T. P.(1987)。School Expenditures and Enrollments, 1960-1980: The Effects of Income, Prices and Population Growth。Population Growth and Economic Development: Issues and Evidence。Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
7.Trow, Martin(1974)。Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education。Policies for Higher Education: General Report。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)。  new window
8.王震武、林文瑛(19940000)。升學制度與升學症候群。台灣的教育改革。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE