:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Sipping Science: The Interpretative Flexibility of Science Cafés in Denmark and Japan
書刊名:East Asian Science, Technology and Society
作者:Nielsen, Kristian H.Balling, GertHope, TomNakamura, Masaki
出版日期:2015
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁1-21
主題關鍵詞:Science cafésDialogue-based science communicationPublic participation in scienceDenmarkJapan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:6
Science cafés were originally conceived as an informal, dialogue-based venue for public participation in science. The first science cafés took place in the United Kingdom and France in 1997–98. Two formats—one featuring a single speaker (United Kingdom) and one with a panel of speakers and a moderator (France)—resulted from these first initiatives. Since then, science cafés have been adapted to other sociocultural contexts, and today, science cafés are being conducted in many different countries and for many different purposes. We examine the emergence and development of science cafés in Denmark and Japan with particular focus on the role of science and technology studies (STS), national contexts of science communication policy, and cultures of public participation. We find that in both countries, despite different expectations of public deliberation about science and technology, science cafés have been easily embedded in the “new” scientific governance programs (Irwin 2006). This is mainly due to institutional support in the national research systems and the involvement of STS scholars who, in their support of public participation in science and dialogue-based science communication, have advocated science cafés as a meaningful way to intervene in science-society relationships. “Sipping science” in a science café, enabling public participation in science deliberations, has interpretative flexibility, appealing to a wide variety of people and stakeholders engaged in public communication of science and technology.
期刊論文
1.Horlick-Jones, Tom、Walls, John、Rowe, Gene、Pidgeon, Nick、Poortinga, Wouter、O'Riordan, T.(2006)。On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain。New Genetics and Society,25(3),265-288。  new window
2.Kerr, Anne、Cunningham-Burley, Sarah、Tutton, Richard(2007)。Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public dialogue。Social Studies of Science,37(3),385-411。  new window
3.Nielsen, Kristian H.(2005)。Between understanding and appreciation: Current science communication in Denmark。Journal of Science Communication,4(4),1-9。  new window
4.Juraku, Kohta、Suzuki, Tatsujiro、Sakura, Osamu(20071200)。Social Decision-making Processes in Local Contexts: An STS Case Study on Nuclear Power Plant Siting in Japan。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,1(1),53-75。new window  new window
5.Castelfranchi, Yurij(2004)。Science Communication around the World: Eyes on Brazil。Journal of Science Communication,3(4)。  new window
6.Dallas, Duncan(1999)。The Cafe Scientifique。Nature,399(120),120。  new window
7.Dallas, Duncan(2006)。Cafe ScientifiqueDeja Vu。Cell,126(2),227-29。  new window
8.Deng, Chung-Yeh、Wu, Chia-Ling(2010)。An Innovative Participatory Method for Newly Democratic Societies: The "Civic Groups Forum" on National Health Insurance Reforms in Taiwan。Social Science and Medicine,70(6),896-903。  new window
9.Evangelista, Rafael、Kanashiro, Marta Mourao(2004)。Science, Communication, and Society in Brazil, the Narrative of Deficit。Journal of Science Communication,3(4)。  new window
10.Greco, Pietro(2004)。Towards a "Mediterranean Model" of Science Communication。Journal of Science Communication,3(3)。  new window
11.Higashijima, Jin、Takahashi, Kae、Kato, Kazuto(2009)。Mouse Model: What Do Japanese Life Sciences Researchers Mean by This Term?。Journal of Science Communication,8(1)。  new window
12.Horst, Maja、Irwin, Alan(2010)。Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensus-ing, and False Consensusness。Social Studies of Science,40(1),105-126。  new window
13.Horst, Maja、Michael, Mike(2011)。On the Shoulders of Idiots: Re-thinking Science Communication as "Event."。Science as Culture,20(3),283-306。  new window
14.Irwin, Alan、Jensen, Torben E.、Jones, Kevin E.(2013)。The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice。Social Studies of Science,43(1),118-135。  new window
15.Joss, Simon(1998)。Danish Consensus Conferences as a Model of Participatory Technology Assessment: An Impact Study of Consensus Conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish Public Debate。Science and Public Policy,25(1),2-22。  new window
16.Mazzonetto, Marzia(2005)。Science Communication in India: Current Situation, History, and Future Developments。Journal of Science Communication,4(1)。  new window
17.Nakamura, Masaki(2010)。STS in Japan in Light of the Science Cafe Movement。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,4(1),145-151。new window  new window
18.Nishizawa, Mariko(2005)。Citizen Deliberations on Science and Technology and Their Social Environ­ments: Case Study on the Japanese Consensus Conference on GM Foods。Science and Public Policy,6(6),479-489。  new window
19.Nishizawa, Mariko、Renn, Ortwin(2006)。Responding to Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan。Journal of Risk Research,9(1),41-56。  new window
20.Norton, Michael、Nohara, Kayoko(2009)。Science Cafes: Cross-Cultural Adaption and Educational Applications。Journal of Science Communication,8(4)。  new window
21.Pitrelli, Nico(2005)。The New "Chinese Dream" Regards Science Communication。Journal of Science Communication,4(2)。  new window
22.Wakamatsu, Yukio(1999)。A Citizens, Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan。AI and Society,13(1/2),22-43。  new window
23.Chen, Dung-sheng、Wu, Chia-ling(20071200)。Introduction: Public Participation in Science and Technology in East Asia。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,1(1),15-18。new window  new window
24.Irwin, Alan(2006)。The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the 'New' Scientific Governance。Social Studies of Science,36(2),299-320。  new window
25.Einsiedel, Edna F.、Jelsoe, Erling、Breck, Thomas(2001)。Publics at the Technology Table: The Consensus Conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia。Public Understanding of Science,10(1),83-98。  new window
研究報告
1.Kobayashi, Shinichi、Hope, Thomas E.、Kusafuka, Minako、Morozumi, Akiko(2004)。科學技術と社會の楽しい関係:イギリズ編。National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Callon, Michel、Lascoumes, Pierre、Barthe, Yannick(2009)。Acting in an Uncertain World: an essay on technical democracy。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Balling, Gert、Emmanuelle Schuler(2002)。Videnskabscafeen: Videnskab, kunst og kultur。Hojbjerg, Denmark:Hovedland。  new window
3.Bauer, Martin W.、Shukla, Rajesh、Allum, Nick(2012)。The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science across the Globe。New York:Routledge。  new window
4.Kobayashi, Tadashi(2007)。トランス•サインスの時代-科學技術と社會をつなぐ。Tokyo:NTT。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kragh, Helge、Kjaergaard, Peter C.、Nielsen, Henry、Nielsen, Kristian H.(2008)。Science in Denmark: A Thousand-Year History。Aarhus, Denmark:Aarhus University Press。  new window
6.Leach, Melissa、Scoones, Ian、Wynne, Brian(2005)。Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement。London:Zed Books。  new window
7.Taenketanken for forstaelse for forskning(2014)。Forsk og fortsd。Copenhagen:Ministry of Science。  new window
8.Collins, Harry M.、Evans, Robert(2007)。Rethinking expertise。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Matsuda, Kentaro,Kato, Kazuto(2008)。Current Situation and Future Challenges for Science Cafes in Japan。  new window
其他
1.Council for Science and Technology Policy(2006)。Science and Technology Basic Plan (FY2006-FY2010),http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/, 2014/07/16。  new window
2.Danish Board of Technology(2006)。The Consensus Conference,http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3?article=468&toppic=kategori12&language=uk, 2014/09/22。  new window
3.Danish Board of Technology Foundation(2013)。Methods,http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3?survey=16&language=uk, 2014/09/22。  new window
4.Grand, Ann(2007)。Cafe Scientifique Organisers, Conference 2007,http://www.cafescientifique.org/attachments/article/263/conference%20report.pdf, 2014/09/22。  new window
5.Mejlgaard, Niels,Bloch, Carter,Degn, Lise,Ravn, Tine,Nielsen, Mathias W.(2012)。Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS): Final Synthesis Report,http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/monitoring-policy-research-activities-on-sis_en.pdf, 2014/09/22。  new window
6.Ministry of Education, Sports, Science, and Technology(2004)。White Paper on Science and Technology 2004. Science and Technology in the Future,http://www.mext.go.jp/english/whitepaper/1302285.htm, 2014/09/22。  new window
7.UNESCO(1998)。The Role of Science and Technology in Society and Governance: Toward a New Contract between Science and Society. Science for the Twenty-First Century: A New Commitment,http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/meetings/eur_alberta_98_e.htm, 2014/09/22。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bucchi, Massimiano、Neresini, Federico(2008)。Science and Public Participation。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Einsiedel, Edna F.(2008)。Public Participation and Dialogue。Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology。Routledge。  new window
3.Horst, Maja(2008)。In Search of Dialogue: Staging Science Communication in Consensus Conferences。Communicating Science in Social Contexts。Berlin:Springer Science + Business Media。  new window
4.Riise, Jan(2008)。Bringing Science to the Public。Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices。Berlin:Springer Science + Business Media。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
1. Alternative Proofs of Results on the Number of Independent Sets in Trees
2. Book Review: Mel Y. Chen, «Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect» (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012)
3. Author's Response to the Book Review of Reconstructing Bodies
4. Book Review: John P. DiMoia, «Reconstructing Bodies: Biomedicine, Health, and Nation-Building in South Korea since 1945» (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013)
5. Book Review: Sulfikar Amir, «The Technological State in Indonesia: The Co-constitution of High Technology and Authoritarian Politics» (New York: Routledge, 2012)
6. Book Review: Azumi Tsuge (柘植あづみ), Seishoku gijutsu: Funin chiryō to saisei iryō wa shakai ni nani o motarasu ka 《生殖技術:不妊治療と再生医療は社会に何をもたらすか》(Reproductive Technology: What Is the Impact of Fertility Treatment and Regenerative Medicine on Society?)(Tokyo: Misuzu shobo, 2012)
7. Book Review: Hsiu-fen Chen (陳秀芬), Yangsheng yu xiushen: Wan Ming de yangsheng wenhua yu wenren shenghuo 《養生與修身:晚明的養生文化與文人生活》 (Nourishing Life and Cultivating the Body: Writing the Literati's Body and Techniques for Preserving Health in the Late Ming)(Taipei: Dawshiang, 2009)
8. 2013世界盃男子拳擊錦標賽攻擊拳路分析
9. 103年臺南全國身心障礙國民運動會選手對賽會官網使用意圖
10. 2014年巴西世界盃足球賽進球特徵分析研究
11. Audit Quality and Dividend Policy
12. 慢性病患藥物治療信守之概念分析
13. 方便取樣和立意取樣之比較
14. 老年人之多重用藥議題
15. 運用跨領域團隊組合式照護改善內科加護病房中心導管相關血流感染率
 
QR Code
QRCODE