Christology in western tradition has increasingly been accused of its inclination to a Hellenistic reading of Jesus Christ. Such criticism, which involves various issues, namely, the early church debate on the two-nature of Christ, the transition of OT theology to NT theology and its cultural tradition, and anti-Semitism in church history, reflects the direct or indirect negligence of the Judaic element in Christianity. In the tradition of western theology, any issues related to ＂Jewishness＂ would without exception fall into the area of ecclesiological discussion. It was the genius of Moltmann who saw Christology, not ecclesiology, as the fundamental concern of this historically complex issue. For this, he determined to make ＂Messianic Christology＂ as the frame by which to construct his third volume of Systematic Theology series, The Way of Jesus Christ, to point out that the Christ motif comprises historical progression and eschatological perspective, through which he attempted to paint a picture of mutually dependent theological prospect between the Jews and Christians, and from which he reflects deeply the potential deficiency and the possibility of opening new paths. This article first explains the Judaic background of Moltmann's concerns, followed by an analysis of the structure and content of The Way of Jesus Christ. Finally, it points out how Moltmann's Christology opens up a theological dialogue between Jewish and Christian communities. He claims that Protestant Christology lacks eschatological nature, while its eschatological perspective is confined by an inflated soteriology. On the other hand, he believes that Jewish eschatology suppresses salvific idea, and as a result, its Messianism could not accommodate Christology. Lastly, he expects the construct of Protestant Christology to be based on the appeal of the principle of faith, love and hope.