:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:逆向支付和解協議之容許性探討--以美國最高法院FTC v. Actavis, Inc.案為核心
書刊名:專利師
作者:許炳華
出版日期:2015
卷期:21
頁次:頁111-139
主題關鍵詞:反托拉斯法專利法逆向支付和解協議FTCActavis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:102
期刊論文
1.劉孔中(20120600)。專利庫--經濟取向分析下之法制比較與調和。智慧財產評論,10(1),23-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hovenkamp, Herbert J.、Janis, Mark D.、Lemley, Mark A.(2003)。Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes。Minn. L. Rev.,87,1719-1766。  new window
3.陳昭華、鍾鏡湖、張乃文、鄭耀誠(20080600)。學名藥試驗免責規範之探討。輔仁法學,35,225-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Galvan, Alex(2014)。A Second Opinion on Pharmaceutical Reverse Payment Settlements: Why Actavis Missed the Mark。Ga. St. U. L. Rev.,30,561+564。  new window
5.Hogges-Thomas, Alicia I.(2013)。Winning the War on Drug Prices: Analyzing Reverse Payment Settlements Through the Lens of Trinko。Hastings L.J,64,1421+1427。  new window
6.Brown, Alyssa L.(2012)。Modest Proposals for a Complex Problem: Patent Misuse and Incremental Changes to the Hatch-Waxman Act as Solutions to the Problem of Reverse。Payment Settlements,41,583+596。  new window
7.Gavil, Andrew I.(2012)。Moving Beyond Caricature and Characterization: The Modern Rule of Reason in Practice。Southern California Law Review,85,733-782。  new window
8.Hemphill, C. Scott(2009)。An Aggregate Approach to Antitrust: Using New Data and Rulemaking to Preserve Drug Competition。COLUM. L. Rev.,109,629+641。  new window
9.Hemphill, C. Scott(2006)。Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem。New York University Law Review,81(5)。  new window
10.Hittinger, Carl W.、Esposito, Leslie C.(2013)。Inre: K-Dur Antitrust Litigation: The Third Circuit's Controversial Pay-for-Delay Antitrust Decision Splits with Other Circuit Courts。VlLL. L. Rev.,58,103-118。  new window
11.Sandoval, Catherine J. K.(2010)。Pharmaceutical Reverse Payment Settlements: Presumptions, Procedural Burdens, and Covenants Not to Sue Generic Drug Manufacturers。Santa Clara COMPUTER and High Tech. L.J.,26,141+142。  new window
12.Christopher M. Holman,(2006)。Do Reverse Payment Settlements Violate the Antitrust Laws。SANTA Clara High Tech. L.J,23,489+502-503。  new window
13.Daniel A. Crane,(2004)。Ease Over Accuracy in Assessing Patent Settlements: A Response to Hovenkamp, Janis and Lemley。Minn. L. Rev.,87,698-709。  new window
14.Crane, Daniel A.(2002)。Exit Payments in Settlement of Patent Infringement Lawsuits: Antitrust Rules and Economic Implications。Fla. L. Rev.,54,747-750。  new window
15.Opderbeck, David W.(2010)。Rational Antitrust Policy and Reverse Payment. Settlements in Hatch- Waxman Patent Litigation。Geo. L.J.,98,1303+1320。  new window
16.Bieri, Diane E.(2014)。Implications of FTC v. Actavis: A Reasonable Approach to Evaluating Reverse Payment Settlements。Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology,15,135-148。  new window
17.Cramer, Eric L.、Berger, Daniel(2014)。The Superiority of Direct Proof of Monopoly Power and Anticompetitive Effects in Antitrust Cases Involving Delayed Entry of Generic Drugs。U. S. F. L. Rev.,39,81+118。  new window
18.Dolin, Gregory(2011)。Reverse Settlements as Patent Invalidity Signals。Harv. J. L and Tech.,24,281+318。  new window
19.Butler, Henry N.、Jarosch, Jeffrey Paul(2010)。Policy Reversal on Reverse Payments: Why Courts Should Not Follow the New DOJ Position on Reverse-Payment Settlements of Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation。Iowa L. Rev,96,57+116。  new window
20.Hovenkamp, Herbert(2014)。Anticompetitive Patent Settlements and the Supreme Court's Actavis Decision。Minn. J. L. Sci. and Tech.,15,3+8。  new window
21.Markham, Jesse W. Jr.(2012)。Sailing a Sea of Doubt: A Critique of the Rule of Reason in U.S.。Fordham J. Corp. and Fin. L.,17,591-602。  new window
22.Postol, Linda M.(2013)。The "Rule of Reason" preferred to "Scope of Patent" Analysis When Determining Whether a Reverse Payment is Legal in the Third Circuit。Duq. Bus. L.J.,15,293+312。  new window
23.Lisa Allen,(2010)。Reviewing the Legality of Pharmaceutical Reverse Payment Settlements: The FTC Doesn't Get It Right。GEO. J. L. and PUB. POL’Y,8,245+247。  new window
24.Schildkraut, Marc G.(2004)。Patent-Splitting Settlements and the Reverse Payment Fallacy。Antitrust L.J,71,1033+1059。  new window
25.Kutcher, Marlee P.(2013)。Waiting is the Hardest Part: Why the Supreme Court Should Adopt the Third Circuit's Analysis of Pay-for-Delay Settlement Agreements。Loy. U. Chi. L.J.,44,1093+1135。  new window
26.Carrier, Michael A.(2013)。Five Arguments Laid to Rest after Actavis。ANTITRUST SRC,13(1),1-3。  new window
27.Carrier, Michael A.(2009)。Solving the Drug Settlement Problem: The Legislative Approach。Rutgers L.J,41,83-84。  new window
28.Carrier, Michael A.(2002)。Unraveling the Patent-Antitrust Paradox。U. Pa. L. Rev.,150,761+766。  new window
29.Carrier, Michael A.(2009)。Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality。Mich. L. Rev.,37+67。  new window
30.Kades, Michael(2009)。Whistling Past the Graveyard: The Problem with the Per Se Legality Treatment of Pay-For-Delay Settlements。COMPETITION Pol'y lNT'L,5,143+147。  new window
31.Picht, Peter(2013)。New Law on Reverse Payment Settlements-The Agenda for Courts and the Legislature After the Supreme Court's Actavis Ruling。Tul. J. Tech. and Intell. Prop.,16,105+119-122。  new window
32.McMillan, Richard、Bram, Mary、Tappan, Brinkley(2010)。Solving the Procedural Quagmire for Testing Reverse Payment Settlements。Minn. J. L. SCI. and Tech.,11,801+805。  new window
33.Backus, Scott A.(2007)。Reversing Course on Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Has Schering-Plough Created the Blueprint for Defensible Antitrust Violations。OKLA. L. Rev.,60,375+379。  new window
34.Okada, Seiko F.(2012)。In Re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation: Pharmaceutical Reverse Payment Settlements Go Beyond the "Scope of the Patent"。N.C. J.L. and Tech.,14,303+333。  new window
35.Ghosh, Shubha(2014)。Convergence?。Minn. J. L. SCI. and Tech.,15,95-96。  new window
36.Jenkins, Stephen Roy(2004)。Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Enlarging the Patent Exclusionary Right through Hatch-Waxman Settlement Agreements Is Not Per Se Anticompetitive。Tul. J. Tech. and Intell. Prop.,295+304。  new window
37.Addanki, Sumanth、Butler, Henry(2014)。Activating Actavis: Economic Issues in Applying the Rule of Reason to Reverse. Payment Settlements。Minn. J. SCI. and Tech.,15,77+91。  new window
38.Khatibifar, Tania(2013)。The Need for a Patent-Centric Standard of Antitrust Review to Evaluate Reverse Payment Settlements。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal,23,1351-1352。  new window
39.Cotter, Thomas F.(2014)。FTC v Actavis, Inc: When is the Rule of Reason Not the Rule of Reason?。Minn. J. L. Sci. and Tech.,15,41-44。  new window
40.Cotter, Thomas F.(2003)。Refining the "Presumptive Illegality" Approach to Settlements of Patent Disputes Involving Reverse Payments: A Commentary on Hovenkamp, Janis and Lemley。MlNN. L. Rev.,87,1789+1795。  new window
41.Cho, Tyler(2013)。Reverse Payment Settlements: The U.S. Supreme Court Has Finally Agreed to Resolve the Issue。J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L.,12,787+793。  new window
42.Newsom, William J.(2009)。Exceeding the Scope of the Patent: Solving the Reverse Payment Settlement Problem Through Antitrust Enforcement and Regulatory Reform。HASTINGS SCI. and Tech. L.J.,1,201+226。  new window
43.Onoe, Yuki(2009)。"Pay-For-Delay" Settlements in Pharmaceutical Litigation: Drawing a Fine Line Between Patent Zone and Antitrust Zone。J. MARSHALL Rev. Intell. Prop. L.,9,527+544。  new window
44.Shapiro, Carl(2003)。Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements。The Rand Journal of Economics,34(2),391-411。  new window
45.陳新民(19981000)。國家的法治主義--英國的法治(The Rule of Law)與德國法治國家(Der Rechtsstaat)之概念。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,28(1),47-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Majumdar, Adrian(2014)。The Role of a Consumer Harm Test in Competition Policy,http://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=lclr, 2014/06/11。  new window
2.Sama, Danilo(2014)。The Antitrust Treatment of Loyalty Discounts and Rebates in the EU Competition Law: In Search of an Economic Approach and a Theory of Consumer Harm,http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2425100, 2014/07/03。  new window
3.FTC,U. S. Dep't of Justice(2014)。Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors,http://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_events/joint-venture-hearings-antitrust-uidelines-collaboration-among-competitors/ftcdojguidelines-2.pdf, 2014/07/05。  new window
4.Werden, Gregory J.(2014)。Antitrust's Rule of Reason: Only Competition Matters,http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2227097, 2014/06/22。  new window
5.Markham, Jesse W. Jr.(2014)。Sailing a Sea of Doubt: A Critique of the Rule of Reason in U.S. Antitrust Law,http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm7abstract_id=l916223, 2014/06/04。  new window
6.Carrier, Michael A.(2014)。The Rule of Reason: An Empirical Update for the 21st Century,http://www.georgemasonlawreview.org/doc/16-4_Carrier.pdf, 2014/06/13。  new window
7.Clancy, Michael J.,Geradin, Damien,Lazerow, Andrew(2014)。Reverse-Payment Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EU Competition Law,http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2345851, 2014/06/04。  new window
8.Gurgula, Olga(2014)。Restrictive Practices in Pharmaceutical Industry: Reverse Payment. Agreements: Seeking for a Balance between Intellectual property and Competition Law,http://www.icc.qmul.ac.uk/GAR/GAR2012/GAR%202012_2_01ga%20Gurgula.PDF, 2014/06/06。  new window
9.Blair, Roger D.,Sokol, D. Daniel(2014)。The Rule of Reason and the Goals of Antitrust: An Economic Approach,http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1302andcontext=facultypub, 2014/06/14。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE