:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Role of Force in Mandarin Verbs of Cutting
書刊名:Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
作者:蕭惠貞 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, S. Hui-chen
出版日期:2015
卷期:13:2
頁次:頁1-30
主題關鍵詞:Verbs of cuttingCategorizationFORCEVC complementarity切類動詞範疇力道動補結構分布
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:33
本文探究切類相關動詞的語義內涵。主要的研究目標是探究語義特徵「力 道」是否該納入在某些漢語切類動詞的語義本質上。研究內容包含十個常 用「切」概念的動詞,如「切、削、剁、割、砍、剖、雕、劈、刻、剪」 等,透過線上問卷實驗與語料庫分析,本研究結果顯示(1)母語者最常使用 的四個分類依據,分別是「工具」、「(藝術)精細化」、「力道」、和「結果(一 分為二)」;(2)「劈、砍、剁」三個動詞為母語者認為最常與語義元素「力 道」相關的切類動詞;(3)語料庫的分析結果支持本研究關於「動補結構互 補分佈」之假設。結果呈現動詞「砍」常與補語「斷」共現;另外,「剁」 與「碎」常共現,而力道大的動詞「劈」則較常與補語「開」(一分為二) 出現。本研究結果不但支持以使用基礎頻率為本的語言理論觀 (Barlow and Kemmer 2000),且亦能對漢語動補的常用結合關係,提供不同的分析結果 與建議。
This study explores the semantic meaning of verbs of cutting in Mandarin; it also investigates whether the semantic component FORCE should be included in the denotation for distinguishing the fine-grained meanings among Mandarin verbs, including “diāo, qiē, xuè(xiāo), duò, gē, kǎn, kē, jiǎn, pī and pǒ”, broadly subsumed under the category of the CUT action events in English. To probe this issue, an on-line questionnaire was used along with a corpus-based analysis of cutting verbs with the following results. Firstly, the most commonly-used implicit categories that Mandarin native speakers use are INSTRUMENT, FORCE, DELICATENESS, and RESULT (SEPARATION). Secondly, based on the frequency of the participants’ chosen words on FORCE-related items, kǎn (100%), duò (89%) and pī (86%) are the top three verbs used with respect to the semantic feature of FORCE. Lastly, the corpus analysis supports the hypothesis of V-C complementary distribution in native speakers’ usage. The preliminary findings support the usage-based view of language (Barlow and Kemmer 2000) and can shed light on the cognitive constraint that implicitly and regularly appears in speakers’ resultative compound usages.
期刊論文
1.Ameka, Felix K.、Essegbey, James(2007)。BREAK verbs and the causative/inchoative alternation in Ewe。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),241-250。  new window
2.Bohnemeyer, Jürgen(2007)。Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),153-177。  new window
3.Chen, Jidong(2007)。'He cut-break the rope': Encoding and categorizing cutting and breaking events in Mandarin。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),273-285。  new window
4.Enfield, N. J.(2007)。separation verbs and the logic of linguistic event categorization。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),287-296。  new window
5.Essegbey, James(2007)。CUT and BREAK verbs in Sranan。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),231-239。  new window
6.Gaby, Alice(2007)。Describing cutting and breaking events in Kuuk Thaayorre。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),263-272。  new window
7.Koenig, J.、Mauner, G.、Bienvenue, B.、Conklin, K.(2008)。What with? The anatomy of a (proto)-role。Journal of Semantics,25(2),175-220。  new window
8.Lüpke, Friederike(2007)。'Smash it again, Sam': Verbs of cutting and breaking in Jalonke。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),251-261。  new window
9.Majid, Asifa、Bowerman, Melissa、Van Staden, Miriam、Boster, James S.(2007)。The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A cross-linguistic perspective。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),133-152。  new window
10.Majid, Asifa、Gullberg, M.、Van Staden, M.、Bowerman, Melissa(2007)。How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),179-194。  new window
11.Majid, Asifa、Boster, James、Bowerman, Melissa(2008)。The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking。Cognition,109(2),235-250。  new window
12.Naess, Ashild(2012)。Cutting and breaking in Aiwoo: Event integration and the complexity of lexical expressions。Cognitive Linguistics,23(2),395-420。  new window
13.Narasimhan, Bhuvana(2007)。tearing verbs in Hindi and Tamil。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),195-206。  new window
14.O'Connor, L.(2007)。‘Chop, shred, snap apart': Verbs of cutting and breaking in Lowland Chontal。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),219-230。  new window
15.Taylor, John R.(2007)。Semantic categories of cutting and breaking: Some final thoughts。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),331-337。  new window
16.Van Staden, Miriam(2007)。Please open the fish: Verbs of separation in Tidore, a Papuan language of Eastern Indonesia。Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),297-306。  new window
17.高虹、鄭錦全(20030700)。Verbs of Contact by Impact in English and Their Equivalents in Mandarin Chinese。語言暨語言學,4(3),485-508。new window  new window
18.Chen, Liang、Guo, Jiansheng(2009)。Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for anequipollently-framed language。Journal of Pragmatics,41(9),1749-1766。  new window
19.戴浩一(20030400)。Cognitive Relativism: Resultative Construction in Chinese。語言暨語言學,4(2),301-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Guerssel, M.、Hale, K.、Laughren, M.、Levin, B.、Eagle, J. W.(1985)。A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations。Chicago, Illinois。48-63。  new window
圖書
1.Barlow, Michael、Kemmer, Suzanne(2000)。Usage-Based Models of Language。CSLI Publications。  new window
2.Gao, Hong(2001)。The Physical Foundation of the Patterning of Physical Action Verbs: A Study of Chinese Verbs。Lund:Lund University Press。  new window
3.Levin, Beth、Hovav, Malka Rappaport(1995)。Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface。MIT Press。  new window
4.Talmy, Leonard(2000)。Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept structuring systems。MIT Press。  new window
5.Levin, B.(1993)。English Verb Classes and Alternations。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Pye, Clifton(1994)。Breaking Concepts: Constraining Predicate Argument Structure,Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Kansas。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bohnemeyer, Jürgen、Melissa, Bowerman、Penelope, Brown(2001)。Cut and break clips。Manual for the field season 2001。Nijmegen:Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics。  new window
2.Fillmore, Charles(1967)。The grammar of hitting and breaking。Readings in English Transformational Grammar。Waltham, MA:Ginn。  new window
3.Goldberg, Adele E.(2010)。Verbs, construction, and semantic frames。Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Levin, Beth、Rappaport Hovav, Malka(2013)。Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity。Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
5.Rappaport Hovav, M.、Levin, B.(2010)。Reflections on manner/result complementarity。Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Langacker, Ronald W.(1988)。A usage-based model。Topics in Cognitive Linguistics。Philadelphia。  new window
7.Slobin, Dan I.(2004)。The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events。Relating Events in Narrative. Vol. II: Typological and Contextual Perspectives。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.Talmy, Leonard(1985)。Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms。Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE