:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後ECFA時代下兩岸投資合作之挑戰與願景
書刊名:嶺東財經法學
作者:張婷 引用關係昝大偉沈芊妤
作者(外文):Chang, TingTzaan, DavidShen, Qlan Yu
出版日期:2012
卷期:5
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:國際投資海峽兩岸投資保障和促進協定International investmentWTOECFACross-Straits Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:18
本文研究重心在於呼籲兩岸正視兩岸投資合作之急迫性,兩岸頻繁投資行為因多年來累積豐富成熟之處理經驗,然兩岸投資合作亦面臨瓶頸與挑戰,故需加強機制面之保障,海峽兩岸投資保障和促進協議之締結實符合兩岸人民期待與實際切身需求。再者,正視兩岸投資合作之階段到位性特色,尤其投資領域瞬息萬變且投資涉及資本高風險流動,兩岸需攜手保持高度彈性與應變力,以高效率因應全球化與區域化所驅動之經濟活動複雜與多變特性。此外,本文分析追求兩岸投資合作之雙贏格局,利益主體因投資所引發之利益衝突乃屬必然,而為追求兩岸雙贏共生,建置具必要性之兩岸投資合作機制即在平衡與協調投資利益及緩解衝突。故,海峽兩岸投資保障和促進協議在符合兩岸人民共同利益下孕育而生。
This article emphasizes the following. First, governments from both sides should realize the urgency of investment cooperation between the cross-straits. Frequent investment activities between the cross-straits accumulate a lot of experiences. However, investment cooperation between the cross-straits still face difficulties and challenges, thus, institutional mechanism should be built. The born of Cross-straits Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement symbolizes expectations and needs of people from both sizes. Moreover, investment cooperation between the cross-straits is a step to step process, especially investment relates to a great deal of capital and high risk. Cross-straits should maintain flexible and efficient to deal with complicate and changeable investment in both global and regional perspectives. Furthermore, this article analyzes a win-win strategy for the cross-straits to face in dealing with investment cooperation. Interest conflicts relating to investment are hard to avoid. To pursue win-win, a mechanism balancing investment interests and conflicts is necessary. Thus, the born of Cross-straits Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement fits in common interests by people from the cross-straits.
期刊論文
1.林栽亨(20101200)。雙邊投資協定徵收條款之研究--以臺灣、韓國比較研究為中心。貿易政策論叢,14,145-210。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bubb, Ryan J.、Rose-Ackerman, Susan(2007)。BITs and bargains: Strategic aspects of bilateral and multilateral regulations of foreign Investment。International Review of Law and Economics,27,291-311。  new window
3.Neumayer, E.、Spess, L.(2005)。Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries?。World Development,33(10),1567-1585。  new window
4.宗剛(20080000)。臺海兩岸產業鏈的對接與協調。WTO研究,10,1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.童振源(20090300)。東亞經濟整合體制對臺灣吸引國際投資的影響。中國大陸研究,52(1),59-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.顏慧欣(20090100)。評析APEC架構下簽訂國際投資協定。經濟前瞻,121,77-81。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃子庭(20110100)。臺灣洽簽FTA的亞太經濟戰略:區域架構角色的觀點。國際關係學報,31,81-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.朱景鵬(19990800)。區域主義、區域整合與兩岸整合問題之探討。中國大陸研究,42(8),71-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張心怡(20060700)。評析當前東亞區域經濟整合與臺灣因應之道。歐洲國際評論,2,1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Desbordes, R.、Vicard, V.(20020905)。Foreign Direct Investment and Bilateral Investment Treaties: An International Political Perspect。Journal of Comparative Economics,37(3),372-386。  new window
圖書
1.陳麗娟(2008)。國際經濟法精義。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾華群(2006)。WTO與中國外資法的發展。廈門市:廈門大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE