:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:最高限額抵押權之探討
書刊名:育達人文社會學報
作者:李子文
作者(外文):Lee, Tzu-wen
出版日期:2009
卷期:5
頁次:頁203-224
主題關鍵詞:普通抵押權最高限額抵押權最高限額抵押權之變更與確定抵押權之從屬性Common mortgageMortgage subject to a ceilingMSTCAlteration and finalization of mortgage subject to a ceilingSubordination of mortgage
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:6
普通抵押權以債務關係已成立為前提,最高限額抵押權係就未來發生但不超過一定數額之債權而為擔保,此與一般抵押權發生、移轉、處分及消滅上之從屬不同。我最高法院跟隨德國法制,早承認此制,多年後再正式立法。最高限額抵押權之所謂最高限額乃指債務額加利息及違約金之總合。但在設定抵押權契約之內容確定前,得因當事人同意而變更債權、債務人、債之確定期日及最高限額。一旦最高限額因法律原因確定,即成為具體數額之債權而非不特定之債權。此時債務人自得請求結算實際債權額。並將其登記變為普通抵押權。即時非債務人之抵押人自得於清償最高限額後,請求塗銷抵押權。又最高限額抵押權確定前,縱債務不存在,抵押權仍存在。必須原債權確定後,該抵押權已無擔保債權,最高限額抵押權才消滅。
Contrary to the common notion “No Debt, No Mortgage”, mortgage subject to a ceiling ( hereinafter MSTC ) is established to cover future debts resulting from certain legal relationship, but not exceeding a certain amount. Common mortgage is attached to debt in terms of its existence, transfer, disposal and elimination. The ROC Supreme Court followed German practices in recognizing MSTC long before this institution became part of legislation. Since there is a ceiling agreed upon for MSTC, this ceiling refers to the sum total of debt, interest plus damage for breach of agreement. Before the finalization of contract establishing MSTC, two parties may agree to change the debt content, debtor, date for ascertaining the amount owed and its ceiling. Once the ceiling is finalized through statutory reasons, such obligation would become specific debt obligation. The debtor may certainly request that such debt be put in exact figures and that registration of MSTC be changed to common mortgage in land office. The non-debtor-mortgagor may request that MSTC be cancelled upon having paid off the ceiling which is lower than debt. Finally, mortgage still exists before finalization of MSTC despite non-existence of debt. The elimination of mortgage would not happen until no more debt obligation is attached to the mortgage after the original debt in the MSTC having been finalized.
期刊論文
1.蔡明誠(20030400)。我國最高限額抵押制度之探討。月旦法學,95,29-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳榮隆(20080100)。臺灣最高限額抵押權立法之評析。臺灣本土法學雜誌,102,9-28。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡明誠(20070700)。民法擔保物權修正對於未來理論及實務的影響及再思考。月旦法學,146,5-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳重見(2006)。共同抵押權論(博士論文)。輔仁大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.彭松江(2005)。最高限額抵押權法定化與實務問題之研究--兼與日本現行法制之比較(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wolf, Manfred(2003)。Sachenrecht。Verlag C. H. Beck。  new window
2.Baur, Jürgen F.、Stürner, Rolf、Baur, Fritz(1999)。Sachenrecht。C. H. Beck。  new window
3.謝在全(200706)。民法物權論。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫憲忠(1999)。德國物權法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭玉波、黃宗樂(2007)。民法物權。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top