:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:嚆矢之志:高柳憲昭射箭軌跡之敘說
書刊名:體育學報
作者:李建興 引用關係林郁偉廖宗耀
作者(外文):Lee, Chien-shingLin, Yu-weiLiao, Tsung-yao
出版日期:2015
卷期:48:3
頁次:頁309-321
主題關鍵詞:和弓奧運運動文化現代性Japanese kyudoOlympic gamesSport cultureModernity高柳憲昭王義
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:194
  • 點閱點閱:89
因與國際頂尖教練長年保持良好交流,臺灣射箭技術與國際接軌綿密而逐於成熟,現代射箭競技運動是歷屆奧運的奪牌重點項目之一,我國曾於奧運奪銀摘銅,並在亞運、世界大學運動會等重大賽事奪金;其中,1936年(昭和11年)出生在日本長野縣的高柳憲昭是臺灣現代射箭競技技術之嚆矢。本研究視高柳憲昭為射箭文化載體,由此觀點切入。緒論:藉由整理高柳氏射箭技藝的經歷,研究課題敘說個案的射箭緣起、臺日的射箭交流、技術的具體內容、傳承的文化技藝等。方法:以半結構深入訪談,文獻分析(包含相片、公文、射箭專著、傳記等一手文獻)等資料蒐集方式,經分析、比較、綜合、歸納後,進行敘說。結果:首先,第二次世界大戰結束後日本政府規劃舉辦1964年東京奧運,促發自學生時期立志參加奧運的高柳憲昭投入現代射箭練習,進入職場後仍不斷自我精進,從事射箭專業教練及行政推廣。其次,高柳憲昭習射之餘撰書立著,經高雄市王義射手拜讀後力邀來臺,之後數度協助我國射箭協會舉辦講習、指導奧運選手,奠立臺灣符合射箭科學原理的動作基礎。再者,經由參加國際比賽的觀摩交流及精研訓練之道,於1976年在高柳憲昭的帶領及指導下,日本隊奪得奧運男子射箭個人銀牌。最後,他揉合日本傳統弓道的身心修練與現代西洋弓箭的革新精神、比較各國射箭推展制度的優劣、吸收歐美射箭科學技術與日本苦練方式,在文化的思想、制度、器物等層次皆有所傳承與突破,並透過選手、教練、行政、作家等身分,終生戮力傳揚射箭運動,體現出東西身體運動文化的揉合。
Owing to long-term positive collaboration with international top coaches, through whom enable Taiwanese athletes the transformation and maturation in archery skills along with the international development, modern archery in Taiwan has become one key medal-winning sport event in the Olympic Games. Taiwanese archery athletes ever won one silver and one bronze medal of archery in 2004 Olympic Games, and attained gold medals in other major games (i.e., Asia Games and World University Games). One important influencing factor for Taiwanese archery success is Noriaki Takayanagi, who was born in Naganoken Japan in 1936, a facilitator for Taiwan modern archery technology development. While this research views Noriaki Takayanagi as the conveyer of archery culture, the purpose of the research is to collate his archery experiences. Introduce: The research topics include his original participation in archery, archery technology interchange between Taiwan and Japan, content of archery skills, and pass-down of archery culture and skills. Methods:Semi-structured in-depth interviews and content analysis (which includes photos, official document, documentary film, archery books, and biography) are used in this study. Original raw data are analyzed, compared, synthesized, and generalize as narration of sport figure. Results: firstly, Japan government planned to hold Tokyo Olympic Games in 1964 after World War II; Noriaki Takayanagi, who aimed at participating the Games, began to devote himself in modern archery training since his early school life. Importantly, Noriaki Takayanagi persisted in archery practice, become an archery coach and promoted archery even graduating from school. Secondly, Noriaki Takayanagi also wrote books while practicing archery. Wong-I, an archery athlete from Kaoshiung in Taiwan, was inspired by Noriaki Takayanagi's work therefore invited him to Taiwan to assist archery development. Noriaki Takayanagi assisted Chinese Taipei Archery Association by holding lecture, and instructing and training Taiwanese archery athletes for Olympic Games. He established the foundation of physical movement that conformed with science skill principle of archery. Thirdly, based upon the experiences from participation in international games and deliberate enhancement in archery training, Noriaki Takayanagi led Japanese Olympic archery athletes to win a silver medal in man's individual event in the 1976 Olympic Games. Finally, Noriaki Takayanagi integrates traditional Japanese Kyudo body-mind training with Western innovative modern archery spirit. In addition, he evaluated and compared strength and weakness of archery institutions from many countries, and absorbed archery science skill from Europe/US and hard training approach from Japan. Consequently, Noriaki Takayanagi makes significant breakthrough and pass-down from dimensions of cultural thinking, system, and utensils. Noriaki Takayanagi devotes himself to archery all his life; as being the athlete, coach, administrator and writer, he himself provides a great example by successfully integrating the Eastern with the Western body culture.
Other
1.(19711225)。高柳憲昭講解射箭標準動作。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.孫立平(19950400)。現代化研究.理論與批判。現代化研究,2(4),5-21。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃秀香(20031200)。後現代思潮對現代社會工作實務理論與處遇的影響及反思。社區發展季刊,104,321-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.廖清海(20050400)。射箭的心靈之約。大專體育,77,70-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bruner, Jerome(1987)。Life as Narrative。Social Research,54(1),11-32。  new window
5.高麗娟、黃光獻(20140600)。體育運動質性資料分析方法。體育學報,47(2),159-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.江文瑞、林湘梅(2007)。臺灣射箭運動的外籍教練1982~1995。臺東市:國立臺東大學。33-44。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江文瑞(2007)。台灣射箭運動發展之研究(1964-2004)(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉亭君(2012)。韓籍射箭教練領導行為之研究--以田仁秀在臺執教為例(碩士論文)。國立體育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅華美(1995)。依賴理論及其在比較教育上應用之研究(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.羅榮渠(199310)。現代化新論:世界與中國的現代化進程。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.林天祐(1993)。象牙之塔春秋記。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.張啟雄、潘光哲、王景玲(2005)。湯銘新先生訪問紀錄。台北市:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.高宣揚(2000)。後現代論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Wallerstein, I.(1984)。The politics of the capitalist world-economy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.二木謙一(1999)。中世武家儀礼の研究。東京都:吉川弘文館。  延伸查詢new window
7.木村吉次(2001)。体育・スポーツ史概論。東京都:杏林舍。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jameson, F. R.、王逢振、王麗亞(2009)。單一的現代性。北京市:中國人民大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.王義Wang, Y.(2009)。回憶錄:高雄市射箭委員會沿革。  延伸查詢new window
10.生沼芳弘(1994)。相撲社会の研究。東京都:不昧堂出版。  延伸查詢new window
11.安沢東宏(1974)。射道の本質。東京都:武道通信。  延伸查詢new window
12.高柳憲昭(1977)。アーチェリー。東京都:講談社。  延伸查詢new window
13.高柳憲昭(1979)。アーチェリー: 図解コーチ。東京都:成美堂。  延伸查詢new window
14.高柳憲昭(2000)。初心者指導。東京都:ティーアンドエイチ。  延伸查詢new window
15.高柳憲昭(2002)。みんなの弓道。東京都:学習研究社。  延伸查詢new window
16.高柳憲昭(2007)。みんなのアーチェリー。東京都:學習研究社。  延伸查詢new window
17.高柳憲昭(2007)。技を極める弓道。東京都:ベースボール・マガジン社。  延伸查詢new window
18.高柳憲昭(2012)。部活で大活躍できる!弓道最強のポイント50。東京都:メイツ出版株式会社。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳鐵君(2009)。遠流活用國語辭典。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
20.Herrigel, E.、顧法嚴(1993)。射藝中的禪。臺北市:慧炬。  延伸查詢new window
21.湯銘新(1999)。我國參加奧運滄桑史。台北:中華奥林匹克委員會。  延伸查詢new window
22.Thomas, J. R.、Nelson, J. K.(2001)。Research methods in physical activity。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
23.Malinowski, Bronislaw、費孝通、吳文藻(1967)。文化論。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
24.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.Clandinin, D. Jean、Connelly, F. Michael、蔡敏玲、余曉雯(2003)。敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.McMillan, James H.、Schumacher, Sally、王文科(1994)。質的教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
27.Ok, Gwang(2007)。Transformation of Modern Korean Sport: Imperialism, Nationalism, Globalization。Hollym International Corp.。  new window
其他
1.(2012)。現代化理論,http://www.modernization.com.cn/。  延伸查詢new window
2.內閣府(2012)。褒章の種類,http://www8.cao.go.jp/shokun/shurui-juyotaisho-hosho.html。  new window
3.公益財団法人全日本弓道聯盟(2012)。全国大会,http://kyudo.jp/contents/code/zenkoku。  延伸查詢new window
4.日本オリンピック委員会(2012)。オリンピック競技大会--歴代日本代表選手記録,http://www.joc.or.jp/database/。  延伸查詢new window
5.高雄市射箭委員會(1971)。高柳憲昭聘函公文,臺北市:高雄市射箭委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.関東学生アーチェリー連盟(2001)。関東学生アーチェリー連盟--歴代委員長,http://ksaf.tsukaeru.info/modules/about/index.php?content_id=3。  延伸查詢new window
7.International Olympic Committee(2012)。Search all results & Olympic medalists,http://www.olympic.org/olympic-results, 2012/11/25。  new window
圖書論文
1.Janesick, V.(2000)。The choreography of qualitative research design。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oak, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Gergen, Kenneth J.、Gergen, Mary M.(1988)。Narrative and the self as relationship。Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE