資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.137.220.44)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Analysis of Imagination Constructs with Engineering Students
書刊名:
資訊傳播研究
作者:
許育齡
/
許盛貴
作者(外文):
Hsu, Yuling
/
Hsu, Sheng-kuei
出版日期:
2015
卷期:
6:1
頁次:
頁53-69
主題關鍵詞:
資訊與電機工程領域
;
工程教育
;
想像力
;
人格特質
;
自我效能
;
社會氣氛
;
Computer and electrical engineering
;
Engineering education
;
Imaginative capacity
;
Personality traits
;
Self-efficacy
;
Social climate
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:27
本研究探討社會氣氛、自我效能,以及人格特質對工程領域學生想像力的預測效果,同時考驗人格特質透過社會氣氛與自我效能為中介的模型,其預測想像力的適配度。本次研究邀集了465位主修資訊與電機工程的大學生參與。結果顯示,開放特質對三種想像力均具有相當高的預測力,並能透過社會氣氛及自我效能為中介間接預測想像力;親和特質亦透過中介路徑間接預測想像力;審慎特質能直接預測構思想像,並透過自我效能為中介間接預測轉造想像;神經質特質可透過社會氣氛間接預測轉造想像;外向特質則可直接預測創始想像。本研究進一步釐清,如何運用人格特質以及透過社會氣氛及自我效能為中介,整合預測資電工程領域學生的想像力。
以文找文
This study analyzes the effects of personality traits, social climate, and self-efficacy on the imagination of engineering majors, and tests the mediating effects of personality traits on student imagination through social climate and self-efficacy. A total of 465 undergraduates, enrolled in computer and electrical engineering programs, participated in the study. The results showed that openness exerts strong effects on student imagination, and indirectly predicts imagination through social climate and self-efficacy. Agreeableness also exerts indirect effects on student imagination through the same mediators. Conscientiousness directly predicts conceiving imagination and indirectly predicts student imagination through self-efficacy. Neuroticism only predicts transforming imagination through social climate. Extraversion only exerts an effect on initiating imagination. This study contributes to the structural view on how personality traits predict the imagination of engineering majors through social climate and self-efficacy.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Schraw, G.、Crippen, K. J.、Hartley, K.(2006)。Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning。Research in Science Education,36(1/2),111-139。
2.
King, L. A.、McKee Walker, L.、Broyles, S. J.(1996)。Creativity and five-factor model。Journal of Research in Personality,30(2),189-203。
3.
Costa, P. T., Jr.、McCrae, R. R.(1990)。The NEO Personality inventory: Using the Five-Factor Model in Counseling。Journal of Counseling & Development,69,367-372。
4.
Amabile, T. M.、Pillemer, J.(2012)。Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior,46(1),3-15。
5.
Agypt, B.、Rubin, B. A.、Spivack, A. J.(2012)。Thinking outside the cocks: The effect of layered-task time on the creative climate of meetings。Journal of Creative Behavior,46,77-98。
6.
Caprara, G. V.、Alessandri, G.、Eisenberg, N.(2012)。Pro-sociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,102,1289-1303。
7.
Charyton, C.、Merrill, J. A.(2009)。Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering majors。Journal of Engineering Education,98,145-156。
8.
Coeckelbergh, M.、Wackers, G.(2007)。Imagination, distributed responsibility and vulnerable technological systems: The case of Snorre A。Science and Engineering Ethics,13,235-248。
9.
Felder, R. M.、Felder, G. N.、Dietz, E. J.(2002)。The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes。Journal of Engineering Education,91(1),3-17。
10.
Furnham, A.、Chamorro-Premuzic, T.(2004)。Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades。Personality and Individual Differences,37,943-955。
11.
Genco, N.、Hölttä-Otto, K.、Seepersad, C. C.(2012)。An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering majors。Journal of Engineering Education,101,60-81。
12.
Hsu, M.-C.、Chiang, C.-W.、Liang, C.-Y.(2014)。The mediator effects of imagination between learning environment and academic performance: A comparison between science and engineering majors。International Journal of Technology and Design Education,24(4),419-436。
13.
Lau, K.、Beckman, S. L.、Agogino, A. M.(2012)。Diversity in design teams: An investigation of learning styles and their impact on team performance and innovation。International Journal of Engineering Education,28,293-301。
14.
Pritchard, M. S.(2001)。Responsible engineering: The importance of character and imagination。Science and Engineering Ethics,7,391-402。
15.
Sheppard, K.、Dominick, P.、Aronson, Z.(2004)。Preparing engineering majors for the new business paradigm of international teamwork and global orientation。International Journal of Engineering Education,20,475-483。
16.
Yeh, H.-T.、Lin, W.-S.、Liang, C.(2014)。The effects of imagination between psychological factors and academic performance: The differences between science and engineering majors。International Journal of Engineering Education,30,746-755。
17.
Yueh, H.-P.、Chang, C.-C.、Liang, C.(2013)。Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?。Thinking Skills and Creativity,10,79-90。
18.
Liang, C.、Chia, T. L.(2014)。Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the imaginative capability scale。Creativity Research Journal,26(1),106-114。
19.
Thompson, E. R.(2008)。Development and validation of an international English big-five mini-markers。Personality and Individual Differences,45,542-548。
20.
Bandura, Albert(2001)。Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective。Annual Review of Psychology,52(1),1-26。
21.
Bandura, Albert(2012)。On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited。Journal of Management,38(1),9-44。
圖書
1.
American College Personnel Association(1994)。Personnel Association The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs。Washington, DC:American College Personnel Association。
2.
Esolen, A.(2010)。Ten ways to destroy the imagination of your child。Wilmington, DE:Intercollegiate Studies Institute。
3.
Holton, G. J.(1998)。Scientific imagination: With a new introduction。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。
其他
1.
Kauffmann, P.,Hall, C.,Dixon, G.,Garner, J.(2008)。Predicting academic success for first semester: Engineering majors using personality trait indicators,file:///C:/Users/givememonkey/Downloads/predicting-academic-success-for-first-semester-engineering-students-using-personality-trait-indicators.pdf, 2015/05/27。
2.
National Society of Professional Engineers(2006)。Frequently asked questions about engineering,http://www.nspe.org/Media/Resources/faqs.html, 2014/12/20。
3.
Perdue, K.(2003)。Imagination,http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/imagination/。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
文化特質調節人格特質對影視傳播學習領域學生想像力之預測效果
2.
Do Diverse Personality Traits Interact to Predict the Imaginative Capability of Design Majors?
3.
Active Participation: The Interaction of Action-Based Inspiration and Conscientiousness on Engineering Imagination via Self-Efficacy
4.
天生設計師?學生人格特質透過想像力的中介以預測創造力
5.
The Combined Effects of Learning Environment and Personality Traits on Student Imagination
6.
澎湖住宿業人員人格特質、組織承諾及自我效能關係之研究
7.
大專體育教師在創意教學行為之研究
1.
技職校院餐旅學群學生人格特質、創造力與就業力關係之研究:以自我效能為中介變項
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
正向心理學在工作上的應用
2.
教師因應科技衝擊:深化發展TPACK迎接科技更迭創新教學經驗
3.
運用人格、心理與環境因素預測教師教學設計想像力
4.
透視島嶼港灣:觀光碼頭之遊客特性、遊憩動機與重遊意願
5.
內在心理如何促發想像?
6.
Related Psychological Factors on Imagination Stimulation of Design Students
7.
探討內在動機與自我效能為中介預測科學想像力的學習模式
8.
運用「做中悟」協助學習者開展再造性與創造性想像力
9.
探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發
10.
教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究
11.
探究想像力的意涵與特徵--探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現
12.
視覺傳達設計學習者發揮想像的內在因素探索與驗證
13.
促發數位設計學生想像的心理因素及其影響
14.
學習環境對視覺傳達設計系所學生想像的促發與影響
15.
轉化虛無--試論想像力評測指標
QR Code