:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論象山與朱子文本所呈顯之儒學宗教性
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:黃信二 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Hsin-er
出版日期:2015
卷期:42:10=497
頁次:頁145-161
主題關鍵詞:儒學之宗教性朱熹象山鬼神命運生死Religiousness of ConfucianismZhu XiLu Xiang-shanGhosts and godsFateLife and death
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:44
本文嘗試從文明演化的高度,透過朱陸文獻分析反思儒學之宗教性。所謂文明演化的角度在本文言,主要是指若依文明從宗教時代進入哲學時期,再進入科學時代的次序觀察,本文認為其中人性的演化,特別是人內在的宗教需求,並未隨著科學的來臨即形成全面的質變,即以理性的發展切除宗教,反對宗教與理性並存的可能。以儒家文本言,其心性系統亦從未離開人的命運、生死與鬼神議題,例如在先秦儒學中,孔子有殺身以成仁之見,孟子則有祭百神與動心忍性兩者並存的觀點;即兩人皆經由心性論的強調,內觀其看待生死與生命奧秘的方式。由於先秦部分已透過另文探討,故本文的任務主要在檢視宋明文本,例如分析朱子如何透過「理」與「氣」對鬼神加以詮釋,以「非理之常,使謂之怪」原則面對鬼怪之事;而象山則提出:「此理充塞宇宙,天地鬼神且不能違異」的看法,在統合「心、性、理」基礎上總括其對天地鬼神的看法。綜合上述背景,本文將檢視宋代理學家對儒學宗教性的哲學轉化機制與其中對原始宗教的保存向度;觀察其如何能在佛教心性論的挑戰下,提供儒家一有效安身立命的哲學觀,且此哲學觀並不排斥宗教情感,即彰顯出一種心性學的轉化機制與原初宗教情感並存的儒學之宗教性內涵。
This article is to analyze and review the religiousness of Confucianism from the vantage point of the evolution of civilization. The perspective of the so-called evolution of civilization refers to the observation about the evolutional sequence of civilization from the time of religion to the time of philosophy and then to the time of science. We believe that the evolution of human nature, particularly the need for religion, is not completely transformed by the coming of science, that is, the possibility to remove religion and deny the coexistence of religion and reason. Regarding the texts of Confucianism, the theories of mind-nature have always revolved around the agenda of the fate of human beings, life and death as well as ghosts and gods. For example, both Confucius and Mengzi looked through the theories of mind-nature at how one sees life and death as well as the mysteries of life. Since the pre-Qin Confucians have been discussed elsewhere, this article focuses on the texts from the Sung and Ming Dynasties. For instance, we analyze how Zhu Xi and Lu Xiang-shan contemplated on the issue of ghosts and gods; Zhu interpreted it through Ii and qi, while Lu based his views on the unification of "mind, nature and Ii." Based on the aforementioned backgrounds, we will examine how much of Confucianism the Neo-Confucians of the Sung Dynasty transformed to philosophy and how much the religiousness of Confucianism they preserved, seeing how they offered an existential view of philosophy not exclusive of religious feelings while the mind-nature theories of Confucianism were challenged the Buddhist theories of mind-nature.
期刊論文
1.牟宗三、盧雪崑(19880800)。宋明理學演講錄。鵝湖,14(2)=158,14-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.牟宗三、盧雪崑(20000900)。康德第三批判講演錄。鵝湖,26(3)=303,1-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃信二(20150200)。《論語》中「天」概念的宗教性之轉換分析。哲學與文化,42(2)=489,155-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃信二(20110700)。論原始儒家之宗教性:以方東美先生觀點為例的探討。哲學論集,44,71-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃信二(20080500)。在儒學與宗教之間:論「以人象天」之哲學意涵。哲學與文化,35(5)=408,73-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃信二(20090800)。論儒學之宗教性:以唐君毅、牟宗三先生為例的思考。哲學與文化,36(8)=423,119-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林安梧(19900600)。「絕地天之通」與「巴別塔」--中西宗教的一個對比切入點之展開。鵝湖學誌,4,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hall, David L.、Ames, Roger T.(1998)。Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.朱熹(2003)。點校四書章句集注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.陸九淵(2007)。象山集。香港:迪志文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.王陽明(2007)。王文成全書。香港:迪志文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.熊十力(1971)。十力語要。臺北市:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭家棟(2000)。牟宗三。臺北:東大圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.唐君毅、《唐君毅全集》編輯委員會(1988)。中華人文與當今世界補編。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.馮耀明(2003)。「超越內在」的迷思:從分析哲學觀點看當代新儒學。香港中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Eliade, Mircea、楊素娥、胡國楨(2001)。聖與俗--宗教的本質。桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
11.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1994)。朱子語類。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李明輝(1994)。儒家思想中的內在性與超越性。當代儒學之自我轉化。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉述先(2000)。論宗教的超越與内在。儒家思想意涵之現代闡釋論集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉述先(2005)。超越與內在問題之再省思。當代儒學與西方文化:宗教篇。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE