:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:百年糾纏(三):統一、獨立或另有突破--中國與臺灣
書刊名:臺灣人權學刊
作者:黃默
作者(外文):Huang, Mab
出版日期:2015
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁217-244
主題關鍵詞:統獨對立兩岸僵局移工新移民多元文化公民權UnificationIndependenceMigrant workersThe new immigrantsPluralist cultureCitizenship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:22
這篇研究札記是我稱之為「百年糾纏:文化的、政治的、與疆域的」系列第三篇,檢視近百年來中國與台灣千絲萬縷的關係,尤其偏重二戰後,國民黨政權撤退到台灣至今,中國與台灣的互動及統獨的爭論,並檢討在統獨之外另闢途徑的可能性,如某種形式的國協、邦聯或聯邦主義。如果統、獨、或國協、邦聯、聯邦主義都不可能被採納,那麼我將進一步探討在台灣內部還有什麼新的力量、新的族群可能帶來人口與社會結構的改變,進而突破當今的困境?這二、三十年來,台灣基於經濟發展的需求,大量開放移工;與此同時,台灣若干階層,尤其是低下階層的男性公民娶不到妻子,因而積極從東南亞與中國大陸引進外籍配偶。多年來他們深受剝削與歧視,但與此同時,台灣逐步受到國際人權標準的約束,不能不重視他們的基本權利。伴隨移工與新移民這兩個族群人數日增,他們的工作與生活條件改善,並進而融入社會,爭取公民權;假以時日,他們將成為促進台灣政治與社會變遷不容忽視的力量。影響所及,台灣勢必逐步轉型為一個在文化、種族、語言上多元的社會;不僅台灣內部統獨對峙的局面要產生變化,台灣與中國大陸之間也一定出現新的關係,不再局限於「同文同種」、「儒家思想」的框架中尋找答案。
This research note, the third in a series of sketches on what I entitle "One hundred years of entanglement: cultural, political and territorial," will tackle the complex and ever changing relations between China and Taiwan. It is divided into three parts: the first part will describe and analyze the controversy of unification versus independence in Taiwan, with the Chinese Nationalist Party leaning towards unification and the Democratic Progressive Party to the side of independence. Then, I will proceed to the pressures from Beijing for unification by military threats and trade inducements, and the resistance put up by the government, the Democratic Progressive Party and a large segment of the civil society. The second part of this note will concentrate on the position and attitude of the civil society organizations and NGOs in Taiwan and abroad for independence. They merged with the Democratic Progressive Party in the 1990s. I will briefly survey the careers of a number of their prominent leaders, so as to indicate the tortuous and slippery path the politicians trod. In the third part I would present the solutions that have been endorsed by many politicians and scholars to break the deadlock, namely some kinds of commonwealth, confederation or federation schemes. However, these solutions were and still are absolutely rejected by Beijing. Against this background, I propose to appeal to two new groups to break the deadlock. They are the migrant workers and the new immigrants. Since the early 1990s the need for workers to sustain economic development has opened the door to immigrant workers and the need for young women of marriageable age for Taiwanese men has brought "foreign spouses" to Taiwan. The former primarily came from Southeast Asia, and the latter from China and Southeast Asia. Both groups have been severely exploited and discriminated against. However, the past thirty years have also witnessed an effort in Taiwan to abide by international human rights law, thus providing legitimacy for these two groups to strive for their rights and freedoms they so clearly deserve. All indicators point to the probability that they will be given citizenship in the not so distant future. Within ten to twenty years, they will definitely become a powerful political force in Taiwan and their diverse cultural heritage will no doubt contribute to a culturally pluralistic and more democratic society. At that point, internal politics in Taiwan, the confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist Party and the Democratic Progressive Party, will be revamped, and the dispute between China and Taiwan redefined, no longer framed by the legacy of "the same culture and the same race" and traditional Confucian ethics. A new beginning will then be possible.
期刊論文
1.張亞中(2014)。「兩岸統合」:和平發展時期政治安排的可行之路。北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版),51(1),144-151。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾嬿芬(20060300)。誰可以打開國界的門?--移民政策的階級主義。臺灣社會研究,61,73-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.顧玉玲(20131200)。跛腳的偽自由市場:檢析臺灣外勞政策的三大矛盾。臺灣人權學刊,2(2),93-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.沈君山(2003)。浮生後記:一而不統。臺北市:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡慧玲(2013)。百年追求:台灣民主運動的故事卷三--民主的浪潮。臺北市:衛城。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳翠蓮(2013)。百年追求:台灣民主運動的故事,卷一:自治的夢想。衛城。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡同榮(2010)。顧台灣。臺北市:民視文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.嚴家其(1992)。第三共和--未來中國的選擇。臺北市:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇起(2014)。兩岸波濤二十年紀實。遠見天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.林宗弘、洪敬舒、李健鴻、王兆慶、張烽益(2011)。崩世代:財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機。臺北:臺灣勞工陣線協會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.社團法人臺灣民主守護平台(201304)。自由人宣言--以人權憲章重構臺灣與中國之關係,www.twdem.org/, 2014/04/11。  延伸查詢new window
2.佐渡守(20150815)。東南亞文青在台灣。  延伸查詢new window
3.周長泰(20150816)。新住民二代扎根雙文化優勢。  延伸查詢new window
4.林晨柏(20000422)。陳水扁:邦聯制取代兩國論有很大討論空間。  延伸查詢new window
5.夏曉鵑(2007)。南洋台灣姊妹會的發展簡史,http://tasat.org.tw/page/1/2, 2015/09/25。  延伸查詢new window
6.張方慈,汪彥成,胡醴云,吳東牧(2015)。疑遭虐釀憾福賜群號印尼漁工一死一失蹤,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/09/20/% E3%80%90%E6%B5%B7%E4%B8%8A%E6%82%B2%E6%AD%8C%E3% 80%91%E7%96%91%E9%81%AD%E8%99%90%E9%87%80%E6%86%BE- %E7%A6%8F%E8%B3%9C%E7%BE%A4%E8%99%9F%E5%8D%B0%E5%B0%B- C%E6%BC%81%E5%B7%A5%E4%B8%80%E6%AD%BB%E4%B8%80/, 2015/09/25。  new window
7.張景為、徐尚禮、陳文信、張雁雯,徐尚禮,陳文信,張雁雯(20140527)。兩岸解套藍綠大老提「大一中架構」,http://www.chiMtimes.com/realtimenews/20140527002114-260407 ’ 2014/05/27, 2015/09/25。  延伸查詢new window
8.張瑞昌(20000606)。陳總統:邦聯制新思維。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭瓊俐,丘采薇(20150823)。募款餐會綠營集結祖國說李登輝:我老但沒糊塗。  延伸查詢new window
10.程嘉文,楊湘鈞(20150821)。李投書日媒日本曾是祖國對日抗戰非事實馬重批李:出賣台灣。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃光國(20150913)。兩岸共構歷史打造文化中國。  延伸查詢new window
12.管婺媛(20150729)。黃光國:洪秀柱應亮一中兩憲底牌。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭宏斌,林河名,郭瓊俐,楊湘鈞(20150805)。課綱爭議朝野協商解套籲學生回家。  延伸查詢new window
14.顧玉玲(2006)。台灣的新奴工制度--高捷泰勞抗暴事件簿(2)新聞:媒體所提供的事件描述與認知觀點,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/ node/7391, 2015/10/22。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳介民(2012)。中國因素與兩岸公民社會對話。文明的呼喚--尋找兩岸和平之路。臺北市:左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.費希平(1990)。為實現「三民主義統一中國」向行政院提出「大中國邦聯」構想。理想與期待。費希平。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE