:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:交互教學法融入國小五年級少年小說閱讀教學之行動研究
書刊名:區域與社會發展研究
作者:楊雅惠
作者(外文):Yang, Ya-hui
出版日期:2015
卷期:6
頁次:頁31-61
主題關鍵詞:交互教學法少年小說閱讀教學Reciprocal teachingJuvenile fictionsReading instruction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究旨在探究以交互教學法融入少年小說之教學設計及對學生進行閱讀教學時遭遇到的困難、因應之道、學生學習表現及學生反應。本研究採用行動研究法,以研究者任教班級的國小五年級學生為對象,以少年小說為研究教材,並以交互教學法的預測、澄清、提問及摘要四項閱讀策略進行18節課的閱讀教學設計。在行動研究過程中,蒐集與分析教師觀察紀錄、省思日誌、學生訪談、學習單等資料加以歸納分析做成結論。研究發現如下:一、以交互教學法中的閱讀策略融入少年小說進行閱讀教學之教學設計是可行的。二、教師可藉由示範教學並利用放聲思考,鼓勵學生多利用上下文對照,引導學生以六何法提問分辨故事重要概念,分析少年小說的構成要素,克服實施交互教學法所遇到之困境。三、教師制定獎勵辦法以及運用小組同儕力量鼓勵學生持續有耐心地將書籍閱讀完畢,以利教學活動對話與討論。四、76%學生能根據文章的篇名、標題及圖片做有意義的預測;82%學生能在閱讀過程中利用各種方法解決疑問之處;72%學生懂得應用六何法提問掌握文章重點;47%學生能分析少年小說的構成要素,串聯成全文大意。五、學生認為最容易的閱讀策略是預測策略;最困難的策略是摘要策略;最常使用提問策略;最能幫助理解文章內容的是摘要策略。六、學生普遍認為閱讀少年小說能提升自身的閱讀理解能力。最後,根據以上研究發現提出建議,供未來研究者參考。
This study attempted to identify the problems encountered by teachers when they integrated reciprocal teaching into the design of instruction on juvenile fictions and when they taught reading instruction, as well as teachers’ countermeasures for the problems, students’ academic performance and reactions. Using action research method, this study observed an elementary school’s fifth graders taught by the researcher with emphasis on juvenile fictions. Moreover, this study integrated the reading strategies required by reciprocal teaching, namely, prediction, clarification, question, and summary, into an 18-hour reading-instruction class. During the action research process, teachers’ observations and reflection journals, students’ interviews and their work sheets were gathered for review, analysis, and summarization. Conclusions were made accordingly. Findings are summarized as follows: 1. When the reading strategies required by reciprocal teaching are integrated into the reading instruction on juvenile fictions, the design of instruction is feasible. 2. Teachers may adopt model teaching method as well as thinking aloud method, thus encouraging students to make use of context comparison. By doing so, teachers can guide students to raise questions using 6W, identify the important concepts of the stories, analyze the ingredients of juvenile fictions, and overcome the problems encountered by the teachers when they use reciprocal teaching. 3. To facilitate the dialogues and discussions required by reciprocal teaching, teachers may initiate incentives and resort to the peers’ efforts, motivating students to read the book until the last page with patience. 4. 76% of students were able to predict meaningfully based on the titles and pictures of articles; 82% of students were able to solve their questions using various methods when they were reading juvenile fictions; 72% of students knew how to identify the key points of articles using 6W; and 47% of students were able to analyze the ingredients of juvenile fictions and thereby comprehended the full text. 5. Students felt that prediction was the easiest strategy and summary was the hardest strategy. Students used question strategy the most, and found that summary strategy was the best tool to help them comprehend the full context. 6. In general, students believed that they had improved their reading comprehension after they read juvenile fictions. Last but not least, recommendations are presented based on the findings stated above for future researchers.
期刊論文
1.許淑玫(20001000)。國小六年級學生實施交互教學法之研究。彰化師大教育學報,1,201-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Williams, J. P.(1998)。Improving comprehension of disabled reader。Annals of Dyslexia,48,213-238。  new window
3.Lederer, J. M.(2000)。Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms。Journal of Learning Disabilities,33(1),91-107。  new window
4.Rosenshine, B.、Meister, C.(1994)。Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research。Review of Educational Research,64(4),479-530。  new window
5.Palincsar, A. S.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-foster and comprehension-monitoring activities。Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175。  new window
6.Palincsar, A. S.、Ransom, K.、Derber, S.(1989)。Collaborative research and development of reciprocal teaching。Educational Leadership,46(4),37-40。  new window
會議論文
1.林鍾隆(1999)。少年小說中的寫實主義。第三屆全國兒童文學與兒童語言學術研討會。台北:富春。13-24。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊媜婷(2008)。國小高年級友誼主題兒童小說閱讀教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏鳴琳(2012)。交互教學法對國小六年級學童閱讀理解能力影響之行動研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.王韻婷(2009)。李潼少年小說運用於國小六年級閱讀教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳明資(2007)。應用圖像思考策略於少年小說閱讀教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉素娟(2009)。相互教學法對國小中年級學生閱讀理解影響之行動研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北縣。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳訓生(2000)。國小低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.何嘉雯(2003)。交互教學法對國小閱讀理解困難學生教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃瓊儀(1996)。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.涂智賢(1998)。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解後設認知、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳品惠(2010)。應用相互教學法於學生閱讀理解之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
11.江彩鳳(2012)。閱讀少年小說對國小六年級學童預測與詮釋能力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.任珮珊(2012)。運用班級讀書會於國小六年級閱讀教學之行動研究--以張友漁少年小說為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.林秀英(2004)。美術班少年小說閱讀指導之研究--以生命教育為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.湯婷琇(2006)。少年小說在國小高年級語文科教學的運用(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.羅靖芬(2010)。運用兒童小說實施生命教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.林佩欣(2004)。交互教學法對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林良(1986)。認識少年小說。臺北:中華民國兒童文學學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯華葳(2009)。教出閱讀力2:培養Super小讀者。臺北:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
4.張子樟(1999)。少年小說大家讀:啟蒙與成長的探索。天衛文化圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.張清榮(1991)。兒童文學創作論。富春文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Vygotsky, L. S.(1978)。Mind in society。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.傅林統(1994)。少年小說初探。台北:富春。  延伸查詢new window
9.李潼(2000)。李潼的兒童文學筆記:已卯兔年篇。宜蘭:宜蘭縣文化局。  延伸查詢new window
10.林文寶(1987)。兒童文學故事體理論。高雄:復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.林文寶(1991)。談少年小說的寫作。台北:幼獅。  延伸查詢new window
12.教育部(2011)。閱讀理解文章與試題分析。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
13.趙天儀(1999)。兒童文學與美感教育。台北:富春。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.段淑芝(1996)。台灣少年小說之發展。認識少年小說。台北:天衛文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪儷瑜(2005)。由語文學習困難的評量工具談其概念與運用。突破學習困難:評量與因應之探討。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊思諶(1989)。談少年小說的寫作。兒童文學論述選集。台北:幼獅。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE