:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論新型偵查方法之法律問題--以GPS追蹤與無人機偵查為例
書刊名:刑事法雜誌
作者:黃政龍
出版日期:2015
卷期:59:4
頁次:頁117-152
主題關鍵詞:GPS追蹤無人機強制偵查任意偵查強制處分法定原則令狀原則GPS trackingUAVsCompulsory measuresNon-compulsory measuresWarrant requirements
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:87
期刊論文
1.Keener, Kevin(2007)。Personal Privacy in the Face of Government Use of GPS。I/S: A JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY,3(3),473。  new window
2.(1977)。Tracking Katz: Beepers, Privacy, and the Fourth Amendment。The Yale Law Journal,86(7),1461。  new window
3.Schumann, David A.(2004)。TRACKING EVIDENCE WITH GPS TECHNOLOGY。MAY Wis. Law,77,9。  new window
4.Shah, Ramya(2009)。FROM BEEPERS TO GPS: CAN THE FOURTH AMENDMENT KEEP UP WITH ELECTRONIC TRACKING TECHNOLOGY?。JOURNAL OF LAW, TECHNOLOGY & POLICY,2009,281。  new window
5.Whitman, James Q.(2004)。The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty。Yale Law Journal,113(6),1151-1221。  new window
6.Hiltne, Philip J.(2013)。THE DRONES ARE COMING: USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES FOR POLICE SURVEILLANCE AND ITS FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS。Wake Forest J. & Pol’y,3,397。  new window
7.Hutchins, Renee McDonald(2007)。TIED UP IN KNOTTS? GPS TECHNOLOGY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT。UCLA L. Rev,55,418-419。  new window
8.Karim, Waseem(2004)。THE PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS OF PERSONAL LOCATORS: WHY YOU SHOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE VOLUNTARILY AVAILING YOURSELF TO GPS MONITORING,。Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y,14,485。  new window
9.Matiteyahu, Taly(2015)。DRONE REGULATIONS AND FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS: THE INTERACTION OF STATE DRONE STATUTES AND THE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY。Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs,48,265。  new window
10.黃政龍(20091100)。美國有關行動電話定位追蹤合憲與否之研究。警學叢刊,40(3),185-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.詹明華、李文章(20050900)。全球衛星定位系統在犯罪偵防上之應用。刑事科學,59,1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃政龍(20100500)。隱私權vs.科技:論警察使用GPS追蹤器偵查犯罪。警學叢刊,40(6)=190,243-270。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Otterberg, April A.(2005)。GPS TRACKING TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE FOR REVISITING KNOTTS AND SHIFTINGTHE SUPREME COURT'S THEORY OF THE PUBLIC SPACE UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT。46 B.C. L. REV.,661,661-704。  new window
圖書
1.Slobogin, Christopher(2007)。Privacy at Risk: The New Government Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.田ロ守一、張凌、于秀峰(2010)。刑事訴訟法。中國政法大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.松尾浩也、丁相順、張凌(2005)。日本刑事訴訟法。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃東熊、吳景芳(2002)。刑事訴訟法論。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳運財(2014)。偵查之基本原則與任意偵查之界線。偵查與人櫂。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.Carmen, Rolando V. Del(2007)。Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice。  new window
7.Whitebread, Charles H.、Slobogin, Christopher(2008)。Criminal Procedure。  new window
8.林山田(2004)。刑事程序法。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳樸生(1993)。刑事訴訟法實務。台北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃朝義(2014)。刑事訴訟法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.HODGES, KEITH(2007)。Tracking "Bad Guys" Legal Considerations in Using GPS,http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2007/july071eb.pdf。  new window
2.Bennett, Brian(2012)。Police Departments Wait for FAA Clearance to Fly Drones,http:// articles.latimes. com/2012/apr/2 9/nation/la-na-dronefaa20120430., 2012/04/29。  new window
3.Bohm, Allie(2014)。Status of 2014 Domestic Drone Legislation in the States,https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/status-2014-domestic-drone-legislation-states。  new window
4.Chuang, Stephanie(2013)。Bay Area Law Enforcement Agencies Test Drones,www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Area-Law-Enforcement-Agencies-Test-Drones-173415551.html., 2013/02/14。  new window
5.Sewell, Abby。Lancaster Takes to the Skies to Get a View on Crime,http://articles,latimes. com/2012/aug/25/local/la-me-0825-lancaster-aircraft-20120825, 2012/08/25。  new window
6.STANLEY, JAY,CRUMP, CATHERINE,AM. CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION。CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, PROTECTING PRIVACY FROM AERIAL SURVEILLANCE: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT USE OF DRONE AIRCRAFT,https:// www.aclu.org/files/assets/protectingprivacyfromaerialsurveillance, 2011/12。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳運財(2014)。由強制處分法定原則與令狀主義論捜索法制。偵查與人櫂。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE